Achievement Test - Explore the Science & Experts | ideXlab

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Achievement Test

The Experts below are selected from a list of 237 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Achievement Test – Free Register to Access Experts & Abstracts

Aek Phakiti – One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to efl reading Achievement Test performance
    Language Testing, 2003
    Co-Authors: Aek Phakiti

    This article reports on an investigation into the relationship of Test-takers’ use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies to the EFL (English as a foreign language) reading Test performance. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative data analyses. The 384 students enrolled in a fundamental English course at a Thai university took an 85-item, multiple-choice reading comprehension Achievement Test, followed by a cognitive-metacognitive questionnaire on how they thought while completing the Test. Eight of these students (4 highly successful and 4 unsuccessful)were selected for retrospective interviews. The results suggested that (1) the use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies had a positive relationship to the reading Test performance; and (2) highly successful Test-takers reported significantly higher metacognitive strategy use than the moderately successful ones who in turn reported higher use of these strategies than the unsuccessful Test-takers. Discussion of the findings and implicat…

Sin Pui Cheung – One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • evaluation of the effects of medium of instruction on the science learning of hong kong secondary students performance on the science Achievement Test
    Bilingual Research Journal, 2003
    Co-Authors: Din Yan Yip, Wing Kwong Tsang, Sin Pui Cheung

    Abstract This paper is the first of a series of articles reporting the findings of a longitudinal study on the impact of a new language policy about the medium of instruction on science learning of secondary students in Hong Kong. This paper compares the science Achievement of Chinese students learning science through a second language, English, with that of students receiving instruction in their mother tongue, Chinese. Based on the scores on a science Achievement Test made up of multiple-choice and free-response questions, the English-medium students, despite their higher initial ability, were found to perform much more poorly than their Chinese-medium peers. They were particularly weak in problems that assess understanding of abstract concepts, the ability to discriminate between scientific terms, and the ability to apply scientific knowledge in novel or realistic situations. This result implies that the English-medium students were handicapped in science learning by their low levels of English profici…

Stephen N Elliott – One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • effects and perceived consequences of using read aloud and teacher recommended Testing accommodations on a reading Achievement Test
    School Psychology Review, 2003
    Co-Authors: Brian C Mckevitt, Stephen N Elliott

    Abstract. This investigation examined the effects and consequences of using Testing accommodations, including reading aloud Test content, with a group of eighth-grade students (N = 79) on a standardized reading Test. Research questions pertaining to the effects of accommodations on reading Test scores and consequences of Testing on teacher and student attitudes were addressed using a repeated measures experimental design and postassessment questionnaires. Results demonstrated that individualized packages of accommodations with or without a read-aloud accommodation had minimal benefit for groups of students with and without disabilities and did not differentially benefit one group of students over another. Accommodations did, however, positively affect many individuals’ Test scores within groups of students with and without disabilities. Furthermore, teachers and students expressed mixed feelings about accommodations and Testing in general. Overall, this study added evidence to support the popular view that reading aloud a reading Test may have an invalidating effect on Test scores. Implications of these findings on Testing accommodation practices and future research are discussed, with particular attention to validity issues when using a read-aloud accommodation. ********** Testing accommodations frequently are used with students with disabilities to facilitate their participation in various types of assessments. “Testing accommodations are changes in the way a Test is administered or responded to by a student. Testing accommodations are intended to offset distortions in Test scores caused by a disability without invalidating or changing what the Test measures” (Elliott, Kratochwill, & Schulte, 1999, p. 2). Educators and policy makers have long recognized the importance of knowing the academic progress of students with disabilities and now require they participate in large-scale accountability assessments. Despite the increasing use of Testing accommodations in assessments, educators and researchers continue to ask questions about their use and the validity of Testing accommodations (Elliott, Braden, & White, 2001; Langenfeld, Thurlow, & Scott, 1997). Reading is a Test content area in which educators seem to have many questions about the appropriate use of Testing accommodations (Bielinski, Ysseldyke, Bolt, Friedebach, & Friedebach, in press). For example, many educators and Testing experts consider reading aloud the Test content (i.e., a read-aloud accommodation) of a reading comprehension Test to be an invalid accommodation because the Test is intended to measure reading skills, including word recognition, fluency, and comprehension. Yet, read-aloud accommodations are currently allowed with no restrictions in at least nine states (Thurlow, Seyfarth, Scott, & Ysseldyke, 1997). To date, there have been few published studies that have examined the effects of a read-aloud accommodation on scores of a reading Test, nor has there been a study comparing the effect of a read-aloud accommodation to accommodations that are less questionable (e.g., extra time, quiet room) for use on a reading Test. Documenting student performance in reading has always been important, but with the 1997 amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA; Pub. L. No. 105-17) and the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, accurately documenting all students’ performance on reading has become an essential element of school accountability (U.S. Department of Education, 2002). If read-aloud accommodations invalidate reading Test scores as popular opinion hypothesizes, then it is important to understand their effects and consequences on students’ Test performance. The purpose of this study was to add to the growing body of accommodations research by providing data-based evidence about the effects and consequences of using Testing accommodations on a reading Achievement Test for students with and without disabilities. …