The Experts below are selected from a list of 81102 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Joe Miemczyk - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
theoretical versus Actual Product variety how much customisation do customers really demand
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2011Co-Authors: Thomas Stablein, Matthias Holweg, Joe MiemczykAbstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to challenge the common claim of “infinite variety” being demanded in the marketplace by measuring not just how much variety theoretically could be produced, but how much is Actually demanded by the customer. To this effect, the authors propose and validate market‐based variety measures with empirical data and in a second step, extend their analysis by applying these measures and empirically testing the impact of variety mitigation strategies, such as postponement and options bundling.Design/methodology/approach – The authors analyse Production and sales data of 226,106 passenger cars, comprising of three models of one vehicle manufacturer sold across four global market regions. The theoretical variety is compared with Actual variety for each model‐market combination, and these data are linked to Actual Production and sales records.Findings – The authors propose and validate Product variety measures based on Actual customer orders, and empirically demonstrate how the...
-
Theoretical versus Actual Product variety: How much customisation do customers really demand?
2011Co-Authors: Joe Miemczyk, Thomas Stablein, Matthias HolwegAbstract:The purpose of this paper is to challenge the common claim of "infinite variety" being demanded in the marketplace by measuring not just how much variety theoretically could be produced, but how much is Actually demanded by the customer. To this effect, the authors propose and validate market-based variety measures with empirical data and in a second step, extend their analysis by applying these measures and empirically testing the impact of variety mitigation strategies, such as postponement and options bundling. The authors analyse Production and sales data of 226,106 passenger cars, comprising of three models of one vehicle manufacturer sold across four global market regions. The theoretical variety is compared with Actual variety for each model-market combination, and these data are linked to Actual Production and sales records. The authors propose and validate Product variety measures based on Actual customer orders, and empirically demonstrate how these measures can be used to assess the impact of late configuration and option bundling strategies, and find that these are generally valid, but that their applicability is contingent upon the respective variety distribution profile. Analyses are developed within the context of a single firm and industry, although an attempt was made to counter this weakness by considering models from the volume, niche and premium market segments. The paper highlights how Actual variety differs from theoretical variety in practice, which in turn co-determines the effectiveness of mitigation strategies applied by firms. The paper's main contribution is to propose and empirically test a set of novel measures of Product variety: the average repetition ratio and a specification Pareto curve, both of which complement and enhance one's understanding of Product variety and its impact on manufacturing and distribution systems.
-
Theoretical versus Actual Product variety: How much customisation is Actually demanded by the customer?
2011Co-Authors: Thomas Stablein, Matthias Holweg, Joe MiemczykAbstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to challenge the common claim of “infinite variety” being demanded in the marketplace by measuring not just how much variety theoretically could be produced, but how much is Actually demanded by the customer. To this effect, the authors propose and validate market‐based variety measures with empirical data and in a second step, extend their analysis by applying these measures and empirically testing the impact of variety mitigation strategies, such as postponement and options bundling. Design/methodology/approach – The authors analyse Production and sales data of 226,106 passenger cars, comprising of three models of one vehicle manufacturer sold across four global market regions. The theoretical variety is compared with Actual variety for each model‐market combination, and these data are linked to Actual Production and sales records. Findings – The authors propose and validate Product variety measures based on Actual customer orders, and empirically demonstrate how these measures can be used to assess the impact of late configuration and option bundling strategies, and find that these are generally valid, but that their applicability is contingent upon the respective variety distribution profile. Research limitations/implications – Analyses are developed within the context of a single firm and industry, although an attempt was made to counter this weakness by considering models from the volume, niche and premium market segments. Practical implications – The paper highlights how Actual variety differs from theoretical variety in practice, which in turn co‐determines the effectiveness of mitigation strategies applied by firms. Originality/value – The paper's main contribution is to propose and empirically test a set of novel measures of Product variety: the average repetition ratio and a specification Pareto curve, both of which complement and enhance one's understanding of Product variety and its impact on manufacturing and distribution systems.
Jukka Saarinen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Open Source, Open Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights – A Lightning Talk
2012Co-Authors: Terhi Kilamo, Ville Kairamo, Petri Räsänen, Imed Hammouda, Jukka Saarinen, Jukka P. SaarinenAbstract:Open innovation projects are fast paced aiming at producing a quick proof of concept of an innovative software Product. This need for speedy results makes the use of open source components as a basis for the work appealing. Open source brings with it an inherent risk of license conflicts that may become an issue when aiming to develope an innovative demo into an Actual Product. In this study, the first results of investigating the knowledge the participants of innovation projects have on intellectual property are presented. The effect this may have on the project results is also discussed.
-
open source open innovation and intellectual property rights a lightning talk
Open Source Systems, 2012Co-Authors: Terhi Kilamo, Ville Kairamo, Petri Räsänen, Imed Hammouda, Jukka SaarinenAbstract:Open innovation projects are fast paced aiming at producing a quick proof of concept of an innovative software Product. This need for speedy results makes the use of open source components as a basis for the work appealing. Open source brings with it an inherent risk of license conflicts that may become an issue when aiming to develope an innovative demo into an Actual Product. In this study, the first results of investigating the knowledge the participants of innovation projects have on intellectual property are presented. The effect this may have on the project results is also discussed.
-
OSS - Open Source, Open Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights – A Lightning Talk
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2012Co-Authors: Terhi Kilamo, Ville Kairamo, Petri Räsänen, Imed Hammouda, Jukka SaarinenAbstract:Open innovation projects are fast paced aiming at producing a quick proof of concept of an innovative software Product. This need for speedy results makes the use of open source components as a basis for the work appealing. Open source brings with it an inherent risk of license conflicts that may become an issue when aiming to develope an innovative demo into an Actual Product. In this study, the first results of investigating the knowledge the participants of innovation projects have on intellectual property are presented. The effect this may have on the project results is also discussed.
Terhi Kilamo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Open Source, Open Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights – A Lightning Talk
2012Co-Authors: Terhi Kilamo, Ville Kairamo, Petri Räsänen, Imed Hammouda, Jukka Saarinen, Jukka P. SaarinenAbstract:Open innovation projects are fast paced aiming at producing a quick proof of concept of an innovative software Product. This need for speedy results makes the use of open source components as a basis for the work appealing. Open source brings with it an inherent risk of license conflicts that may become an issue when aiming to develope an innovative demo into an Actual Product. In this study, the first results of investigating the knowledge the participants of innovation projects have on intellectual property are presented. The effect this may have on the project results is also discussed.
-
open source open innovation and intellectual property rights a lightning talk
Open Source Systems, 2012Co-Authors: Terhi Kilamo, Ville Kairamo, Petri Räsänen, Imed Hammouda, Jukka SaarinenAbstract:Open innovation projects are fast paced aiming at producing a quick proof of concept of an innovative software Product. This need for speedy results makes the use of open source components as a basis for the work appealing. Open source brings with it an inherent risk of license conflicts that may become an issue when aiming to develope an innovative demo into an Actual Product. In this study, the first results of investigating the knowledge the participants of innovation projects have on intellectual property are presented. The effect this may have on the project results is also discussed.
-
OSS - Open Source, Open Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights – A Lightning Talk
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2012Co-Authors: Terhi Kilamo, Ville Kairamo, Petri Räsänen, Imed Hammouda, Jukka SaarinenAbstract:Open innovation projects are fast paced aiming at producing a quick proof of concept of an innovative software Product. This need for speedy results makes the use of open source components as a basis for the work appealing. Open source brings with it an inherent risk of license conflicts that may become an issue when aiming to develope an innovative demo into an Actual Product. In this study, the first results of investigating the knowledge the participants of innovation projects have on intellectual property are presented. The effect this may have on the project results is also discussed.
Matthias Holweg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
theoretical versus Actual Product variety how much customisation do customers really demand
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2011Co-Authors: Thomas Stablein, Matthias Holweg, Joe MiemczykAbstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to challenge the common claim of “infinite variety” being demanded in the marketplace by measuring not just how much variety theoretically could be produced, but how much is Actually demanded by the customer. To this effect, the authors propose and validate market‐based variety measures with empirical data and in a second step, extend their analysis by applying these measures and empirically testing the impact of variety mitigation strategies, such as postponement and options bundling.Design/methodology/approach – The authors analyse Production and sales data of 226,106 passenger cars, comprising of three models of one vehicle manufacturer sold across four global market regions. The theoretical variety is compared with Actual variety for each model‐market combination, and these data are linked to Actual Production and sales records.Findings – The authors propose and validate Product variety measures based on Actual customer orders, and empirically demonstrate how the...
-
Theoretical versus Actual Product variety: How much customisation do customers really demand?
2011Co-Authors: Joe Miemczyk, Thomas Stablein, Matthias HolwegAbstract:The purpose of this paper is to challenge the common claim of "infinite variety" being demanded in the marketplace by measuring not just how much variety theoretically could be produced, but how much is Actually demanded by the customer. To this effect, the authors propose and validate market-based variety measures with empirical data and in a second step, extend their analysis by applying these measures and empirically testing the impact of variety mitigation strategies, such as postponement and options bundling. The authors analyse Production and sales data of 226,106 passenger cars, comprising of three models of one vehicle manufacturer sold across four global market regions. The theoretical variety is compared with Actual variety for each model-market combination, and these data are linked to Actual Production and sales records. The authors propose and validate Product variety measures based on Actual customer orders, and empirically demonstrate how these measures can be used to assess the impact of late configuration and option bundling strategies, and find that these are generally valid, but that their applicability is contingent upon the respective variety distribution profile. Analyses are developed within the context of a single firm and industry, although an attempt was made to counter this weakness by considering models from the volume, niche and premium market segments. The paper highlights how Actual variety differs from theoretical variety in practice, which in turn co-determines the effectiveness of mitigation strategies applied by firms. The paper's main contribution is to propose and empirically test a set of novel measures of Product variety: the average repetition ratio and a specification Pareto curve, both of which complement and enhance one's understanding of Product variety and its impact on manufacturing and distribution systems.
-
Theoretical versus Actual Product variety: How much customisation is Actually demanded by the customer?
2011Co-Authors: Thomas Stablein, Matthias Holweg, Joe MiemczykAbstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to challenge the common claim of “infinite variety” being demanded in the marketplace by measuring not just how much variety theoretically could be produced, but how much is Actually demanded by the customer. To this effect, the authors propose and validate market‐based variety measures with empirical data and in a second step, extend their analysis by applying these measures and empirically testing the impact of variety mitigation strategies, such as postponement and options bundling. Design/methodology/approach – The authors analyse Production and sales data of 226,106 passenger cars, comprising of three models of one vehicle manufacturer sold across four global market regions. The theoretical variety is compared with Actual variety for each model‐market combination, and these data are linked to Actual Production and sales records. Findings – The authors propose and validate Product variety measures based on Actual customer orders, and empirically demonstrate how these measures can be used to assess the impact of late configuration and option bundling strategies, and find that these are generally valid, but that their applicability is contingent upon the respective variety distribution profile. Research limitations/implications – Analyses are developed within the context of a single firm and industry, although an attempt was made to counter this weakness by considering models from the volume, niche and premium market segments. Practical implications – The paper highlights how Actual variety differs from theoretical variety in practice, which in turn co‐determines the effectiveness of mitigation strategies applied by firms. Originality/value – The paper's main contribution is to propose and empirically test a set of novel measures of Product variety: the average repetition ratio and a specification Pareto curve, both of which complement and enhance one's understanding of Product variety and its impact on manufacturing and distribution systems.
Thomas Stablein - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
theoretical versus Actual Product variety how much customisation do customers really demand
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2011Co-Authors: Thomas Stablein, Matthias Holweg, Joe MiemczykAbstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to challenge the common claim of “infinite variety” being demanded in the marketplace by measuring not just how much variety theoretically could be produced, but how much is Actually demanded by the customer. To this effect, the authors propose and validate market‐based variety measures with empirical data and in a second step, extend their analysis by applying these measures and empirically testing the impact of variety mitigation strategies, such as postponement and options bundling.Design/methodology/approach – The authors analyse Production and sales data of 226,106 passenger cars, comprising of three models of one vehicle manufacturer sold across four global market regions. The theoretical variety is compared with Actual variety for each model‐market combination, and these data are linked to Actual Production and sales records.Findings – The authors propose and validate Product variety measures based on Actual customer orders, and empirically demonstrate how the...
-
Theoretical versus Actual Product variety: How much customisation do customers really demand?
2011Co-Authors: Joe Miemczyk, Thomas Stablein, Matthias HolwegAbstract:The purpose of this paper is to challenge the common claim of "infinite variety" being demanded in the marketplace by measuring not just how much variety theoretically could be produced, but how much is Actually demanded by the customer. To this effect, the authors propose and validate market-based variety measures with empirical data and in a second step, extend their analysis by applying these measures and empirically testing the impact of variety mitigation strategies, such as postponement and options bundling. The authors analyse Production and sales data of 226,106 passenger cars, comprising of three models of one vehicle manufacturer sold across four global market regions. The theoretical variety is compared with Actual variety for each model-market combination, and these data are linked to Actual Production and sales records. The authors propose and validate Product variety measures based on Actual customer orders, and empirically demonstrate how these measures can be used to assess the impact of late configuration and option bundling strategies, and find that these are generally valid, but that their applicability is contingent upon the respective variety distribution profile. Analyses are developed within the context of a single firm and industry, although an attempt was made to counter this weakness by considering models from the volume, niche and premium market segments. The paper highlights how Actual variety differs from theoretical variety in practice, which in turn co-determines the effectiveness of mitigation strategies applied by firms. The paper's main contribution is to propose and empirically test a set of novel measures of Product variety: the average repetition ratio and a specification Pareto curve, both of which complement and enhance one's understanding of Product variety and its impact on manufacturing and distribution systems.
-
Theoretical versus Actual Product variety: How much customisation is Actually demanded by the customer?
2011Co-Authors: Thomas Stablein, Matthias Holweg, Joe MiemczykAbstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to challenge the common claim of “infinite variety” being demanded in the marketplace by measuring not just how much variety theoretically could be produced, but how much is Actually demanded by the customer. To this effect, the authors propose and validate market‐based variety measures with empirical data and in a second step, extend their analysis by applying these measures and empirically testing the impact of variety mitigation strategies, such as postponement and options bundling. Design/methodology/approach – The authors analyse Production and sales data of 226,106 passenger cars, comprising of three models of one vehicle manufacturer sold across four global market regions. The theoretical variety is compared with Actual variety for each model‐market combination, and these data are linked to Actual Production and sales records. Findings – The authors propose and validate Product variety measures based on Actual customer orders, and empirically demonstrate how these measures can be used to assess the impact of late configuration and option bundling strategies, and find that these are generally valid, but that their applicability is contingent upon the respective variety distribution profile. Research limitations/implications – Analyses are developed within the context of a single firm and industry, although an attempt was made to counter this weakness by considering models from the volume, niche and premium market segments. Practical implications – The paper highlights how Actual variety differs from theoretical variety in practice, which in turn co‐determines the effectiveness of mitigation strategies applied by firms. Originality/value – The paper's main contribution is to propose and empirically test a set of novel measures of Product variety: the average repetition ratio and a specification Pareto curve, both of which complement and enhance one's understanding of Product variety and its impact on manufacturing and distribution systems.
