The Experts below are selected from a list of 567687 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Francisco Aparicio-navarro - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Man-In-the-Middle, De-authentication and Rogue AP Attacks in 802.11 networks
    2017
    Co-Authors: Kostas Kyriakopoulos, Francisco Aparicio-navarro
    Abstract:

    We would like to share the log files (pcap file, collected with airodump-ng) of experiments conducted within the Networks group in Loughborough University. The experiments involve a wireless client associated to an AP and an attacker launching injection attacks (see more details below). The purpose of the experiments is to test our multi-layer fusion ideas for detection of injection type of attacks. We decided to share the data with the research community in an effort to help others test whether their ideas/algorithms can detect the malicious frames and as a platform for comparing results. Three main types of attacks have been launched using publicly available tools: 1) Man-In-The-Middle at the Physical Layer attack - using Airpwn tool 2) De-authentication Attack Using Aircrack-Ng 3) Rogue Access Point (AP) attackSee attached description PDF file for further details.

  • Man-In-the-Middle, De-authentication and Rogue AP Attacks in 802.11 networks
    2017
    Co-Authors: Kostas Kyriakopoulos, Francisco Aparicio-navarro
    Abstract:

    We would like to share the log files (pcap file, collected with airodump-ng) of experiments conducted within the Networks team of the Signal Processing and Networks research group at Loughborough University. The experiments involve a wireless client associated to an AP and an attacker launching injection attacks (see more details below). The purpose of the experiments is to test our multi-layer fusion ideas for detection of injection type of attacks. We decided to share the data with the research community in an effort to help others test whether their ideas/algorithms can detect the malicious frames and as a platform for comparing results. Three main types of attacks have been launched using publicly available tools:1) Man-In-The-Middle at the Physical Layer attack - using Airpwn tool2) De-authentication Attack Using Aircrack-Ng3) Rogue Access Point (AP) attackSee attached description PDF file for further details.

Kostas Kyriakopoulos - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Man-In-the-Middle, De-authentication and Rogue AP Attacks in 802.11 networks
    2017
    Co-Authors: Kostas Kyriakopoulos, Francisco Aparicio-navarro
    Abstract:

    We would like to share the log files (pcap file, collected with airodump-ng) of experiments conducted within the Networks group in Loughborough University. The experiments involve a wireless client associated to an AP and an attacker launching injection attacks (see more details below). The purpose of the experiments is to test our multi-layer fusion ideas for detection of injection type of attacks. We decided to share the data with the research community in an effort to help others test whether their ideas/algorithms can detect the malicious frames and as a platform for comparing results. Three main types of attacks have been launched using publicly available tools: 1) Man-In-The-Middle at the Physical Layer attack - using Airpwn tool 2) De-authentication Attack Using Aircrack-Ng 3) Rogue Access Point (AP) attackSee attached description PDF file for further details.

  • Man-In-the-Middle, De-authentication and Rogue AP Attacks in 802.11 networks
    2017
    Co-Authors: Kostas Kyriakopoulos, Francisco Aparicio-navarro
    Abstract:

    We would like to share the log files (pcap file, collected with airodump-ng) of experiments conducted within the Networks team of the Signal Processing and Networks research group at Loughborough University. The experiments involve a wireless client associated to an AP and an attacker launching injection attacks (see more details below). The purpose of the experiments is to test our multi-layer fusion ideas for detection of injection type of attacks. We decided to share the data with the research community in an effort to help others test whether their ideas/algorithms can detect the malicious frames and as a platform for comparing results. Three main types of attacks have been launched using publicly available tools:1) Man-In-The-Middle at the Physical Layer attack - using Airpwn tool2) De-authentication Attack Using Aircrack-Ng3) Rogue Access Point (AP) attackSee attached description PDF file for further details.

Martin Vuagnoux - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • smashing wep in a passive attack
    Fast Software Encryption, 2013
    Co-Authors: Pouyan Sepehrdad, Petr Susil, Serge Vaudenay, Martin Vuagnoux
    Abstract:

    In this paper, we report extremely fast and optimised active and passive attacks against the old IEEE 802.11 wireless communication protocol WEP. This was achieved through a huge amount of theoretical and experimental analysis (capturing WiFi packets), refinement and optimisation of all the former known attacks and methodologies against RC4 stream cipher in WEP mode. We support all our claims by providing an implementation of this attack as a publicly available patch on Aircrack-Ng. Our new attacks improve its success probability drastically. We adapt our theoretical analysis in Eurocrypt 2011 to real-world scenarios and we perform a slight adjustment to match the empirical observations. Our active attack, based on ARP injection, requires \(22\,500\) packets to gain success probability of \(50\,\%\) against a \(104\)-bit WEP key, using Aircrack-Ng in non-interactive mode. It runs in less than \(5\) s on an off-the-shelf PC. Using the same number of packets, Aicrack-ng yields around \(3\,\%\) success rate. Furthermore, we describe very fast passive only attacks by just eavesdropping TCP/IPv4 packets in a WiFi communication. Our passive attack requires \(27\,500\) packets. This is much less than the number of packets Aircrack-Ng requires in active mode (around \(37\,500\)), which is a huge improvement. We believe that our analysis brings on further insight to the security of RC4.

Maravić Marin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Network security device based with Raspberry Pi 4 and Kali Linux OS
    University of Split. Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture. Department of Electronics and Computing., 2021
    Co-Authors: Maravić Marin
    Abstract:

    Cilj ovog projekta je bio konfigurirati Raspberry Pi računalo, uz pomoć Kali Linux operacijskog sustava, u alat za hakiranje i testiranje sigurnosti, te time podignuti svijest o sigurnosti. Osim upoznavanja s Kali Linux operacijskim sustavom i Raspberry Pi 4 računalom, osvrnulo se i na njihovu konfiguraciju koja je potrebna za uspješan rad ovog uređaja. Također su opisana četiri alata (Aircrack-Ng, Legion, Proxychains, Phoneinfoga), njihovo konfiguriranje i po potrebi instalacija, način njihovog korištenja kao i rezultati njihovog korištenja. Kroz ovaj završni rad se prikazalo koliko je zapravo jednostavno izvršiti „cyber“ napad i kojim metodama da bi se na temelju toga došlo do zaključka.The purpose of this project was to configure a Raspberry Pi computer, with the help of the Kali Linux operating system, into a hacking and security testing tool, thus raising security awareness. In addition to getting acquainted with the Kali Linux operating system and Raspberry Pi 4 computer, the project mentions their configuration, which is necessary for the successful operation of this device. Also described are four tools (Aircrack-Ng, Legion, Proxychains, Phoneinfoga), their configuration and, if necessary, installation, how to use them and the results of their use. Through this final paper, it was shown how easy it is to actually carry out a "cyber" attack and by what methods to reach a conclusion based on that

Persson Johan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Constructing and Evaluating a Raspberry Pi Penetration Testing/Digital Forensics Reconnaissance Tool
    Högskolan i Halmstad Akademin för informationsteknologi, 2020
    Co-Authors: Lundgren Marcus, Persson Johan
    Abstract:

    Tools that automate processes are always sough after across the entire IT field. This project's aim was to build and evaluate a semi-automated reconnaissance tool based on a Raspberry Pi 4, for use in penetration testing and/or digital forensics. The software is written in Python 3 and utilizes Scapy, PyQt5 and the Aircrack-Ng suite along with other pre-existing tools. The device is targeted against wireless networks and its main purpose is to capture what is known as the WPA handshake and thereby crack Wi-Fi passwords. Upon achieving this, the program shall then connect to the cracked network, start packet sniffing and perform a host discovery and scan for open ports. The final product underwent three tests and passed them all, except the step involving port scanning - most likely due to hardware and/or operating system faults, since other devices are able to perform these operations. The main functionalities of this device and software are to: identify and assess nearby network access points, perform deauthentication attacks, capture network traffic (including WPA handshakes), crack Wi-Fi passwords, connect to cracked networks and finally to perform host discovery and port scanning. All of these steps shall be executed automatically after selecting the target networks and pressing the start button. Based on the test results it can be stated that this device is well suited for practical use within cyber security and digital forensics. However, due to the Raspberry Pi's limited computing power users may be advised to outsource the cracking process to a more powerful machine, for the purpose of productivity and time efficiency