The Experts below are selected from a list of 12291 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Kevin Mcmillan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • kids birthday party Bucksburn Aberdeen
    2013
    Co-Authors: Kevin Mcmillan
    Abstract:

    kids birthday party Bucksburn Aberdeen: Animal Handling Have you ever seen an Animal Handling kids birthday party Bucksburn Aberdeen, for a kids birthday party? If you haven't, then you'll be amazed at what a great option it is for your childs birthday...

  • childrens party cumbernauld
    2013
    Co-Authors: Kevin Mcmillan
    Abstract:

    childrens party cumbernauld: Animal Handling Have you ever seen an Animal Handling childrens party cumbernauld, for a kids birthday party? If you haven't, then you'll be amazed at what a great option it is for your childs birthday party. It's great kids...

  • birthday party glasgow
    2013
    Co-Authors: Kevin Mcmillan
    Abstract:

    birthday party glasgow: Animal Handling parties Animal Man has a number of different childrens parties it can offer you. Animal Man's Mini Zoo have been providing parties for years now and have a great deal of knowledge in the childrens entertainment...

  • birthday party edinburgh
    2013
    Co-Authors: Kevin Mcmillan
    Abstract:

    birthday party edinburgh: Animal Handling parties Animal Man has a number of different childrens parties it can offer you. Animal Man's Mini Zoo have been providing parties for years now and have a great deal of knowledge in the childrens entertainment...

  • kids birthday party newton mearns
    2013
    Co-Authors: Kevin Mcmillan
    Abstract:

    kids birthday party newton mearns: Animal Handling Have you ever seen an Animal Handling kids birthday party newton mearns, for a kids birthday party? If you haven't, then you'll be amazed at what a great option it is for your childs birthday party. It's...

Marc C. Huisman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Standardization of Small Animal Imaging—Current Status and Future Prospects
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Julia G. Mannheim, Firat Kara, Janine Doorduin, Kerstin Fuchs, Gerald Reischl, Sayuan Liang, Marleen Verhoye, Felix Gremse, Laura Mezzanotte, Marc C. Huisman
    Abstract:

    The benefit of small Animal imaging is directly linked to the validity and reliability of the collected data. If the data (regardless of the modality used) are not reproducible and/or reliable, then the outcome of the data is rather questionable. Therefore, standardization of the use of small Animal imaging equipment, as well as of Animal Handling in general, is of paramount importance. In a recent paper, guidance for efficient small Animal imaging quality control was offered and discussed, among others, the use of phantoms in setting up a quality control program (Osborne et al. 2016). The same phantoms can be used to standardize image quality parameters for multi-center studies or multi-scanners within center studies. In Animal experiments, the additional complexity due to Animal Handling needs to be addressed to ensure standardized imaging procedures. In this review, we will address the current status of standardization in preclinical imaging, as well as potential benefits from increased levels of standardization.

  • Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects
    Molecular imaging and biology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Julia G. Mannheim, Firat Kara, Janine Doorduin, Kerstin Fuchs, Gerald Reischl, Sayuan Liang, Marleen Verhoye, Felix Gremse, Laura Mezzanotte, Marc C. Huisman
    Abstract:

    The benefit of small Animal imaging is directly linked to the validity and reliability of the collected data. If the data (regardless of the modality used) are not reproducible and/or reliable, then the outcome of the data is rather questionable. Therefore, standardization of the use of small Animal imaging equipment, as well as of Animal Handling in general, is of paramount importance. In a recent paper, guidance for efficient small Animal imaging quality control was offered and discussed, among others, the use of phantoms in setting up a quality control program (Osborne et al. 2016). The same phantoms can be used to standardize image quality parameters for multi-center studies or multi-scanners within center studies. In Animal experiments, the additional complexity due to Animal Handling needs to be addressed to ensure standardized imaging procedures. In this review, we will address the current status of standardization in preclinical imaging, as well as potential benefits from increased levels of standardization.

Julia G. Mannheim - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Standardization of Small Animal Imaging—Current Status and Future Prospects
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Julia G. Mannheim, Firat Kara, Janine Doorduin, Kerstin Fuchs, Gerald Reischl, Sayuan Liang, Marleen Verhoye, Felix Gremse, Laura Mezzanotte, Marc C. Huisman
    Abstract:

    The benefit of small Animal imaging is directly linked to the validity and reliability of the collected data. If the data (regardless of the modality used) are not reproducible and/or reliable, then the outcome of the data is rather questionable. Therefore, standardization of the use of small Animal imaging equipment, as well as of Animal Handling in general, is of paramount importance. In a recent paper, guidance for efficient small Animal imaging quality control was offered and discussed, among others, the use of phantoms in setting up a quality control program (Osborne et al. 2016). The same phantoms can be used to standardize image quality parameters for multi-center studies or multi-scanners within center studies. In Animal experiments, the additional complexity due to Animal Handling needs to be addressed to ensure standardized imaging procedures. In this review, we will address the current status of standardization in preclinical imaging, as well as potential benefits from increased levels of standardization.

  • Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects
    Molecular imaging and biology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Julia G. Mannheim, Firat Kara, Janine Doorduin, Kerstin Fuchs, Gerald Reischl, Sayuan Liang, Marleen Verhoye, Felix Gremse, Laura Mezzanotte, Marc C. Huisman
    Abstract:

    The benefit of small Animal imaging is directly linked to the validity and reliability of the collected data. If the data (regardless of the modality used) are not reproducible and/or reliable, then the outcome of the data is rather questionable. Therefore, standardization of the use of small Animal imaging equipment, as well as of Animal Handling in general, is of paramount importance. In a recent paper, guidance for efficient small Animal imaging quality control was offered and discussed, among others, the use of phantoms in setting up a quality control program (Osborne et al. 2016). The same phantoms can be used to standardize image quality parameters for multi-center studies or multi-scanners within center studies. In Animal experiments, the additional complexity due to Animal Handling needs to be addressed to ensure standardized imaging procedures. In this review, we will address the current status of standardization in preclinical imaging, as well as potential benefits from increased levels of standardization.

Kerstin Fuchs - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Standardization of Small Animal Imaging—Current Status and Future Prospects
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Julia G. Mannheim, Firat Kara, Janine Doorduin, Kerstin Fuchs, Gerald Reischl, Sayuan Liang, Marleen Verhoye, Felix Gremse, Laura Mezzanotte, Marc C. Huisman
    Abstract:

    The benefit of small Animal imaging is directly linked to the validity and reliability of the collected data. If the data (regardless of the modality used) are not reproducible and/or reliable, then the outcome of the data is rather questionable. Therefore, standardization of the use of small Animal imaging equipment, as well as of Animal Handling in general, is of paramount importance. In a recent paper, guidance for efficient small Animal imaging quality control was offered and discussed, among others, the use of phantoms in setting up a quality control program (Osborne et al. 2016). The same phantoms can be used to standardize image quality parameters for multi-center studies or multi-scanners within center studies. In Animal experiments, the additional complexity due to Animal Handling needs to be addressed to ensure standardized imaging procedures. In this review, we will address the current status of standardization in preclinical imaging, as well as potential benefits from increased levels of standardization.

  • Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects
    Molecular imaging and biology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Julia G. Mannheim, Firat Kara, Janine Doorduin, Kerstin Fuchs, Gerald Reischl, Sayuan Liang, Marleen Verhoye, Felix Gremse, Laura Mezzanotte, Marc C. Huisman
    Abstract:

    The benefit of small Animal imaging is directly linked to the validity and reliability of the collected data. If the data (regardless of the modality used) are not reproducible and/or reliable, then the outcome of the data is rather questionable. Therefore, standardization of the use of small Animal imaging equipment, as well as of Animal Handling in general, is of paramount importance. In a recent paper, guidance for efficient small Animal imaging quality control was offered and discussed, among others, the use of phantoms in setting up a quality control program (Osborne et al. 2016). The same phantoms can be used to standardize image quality parameters for multi-center studies or multi-scanners within center studies. In Animal experiments, the additional complexity due to Animal Handling needs to be addressed to ensure standardized imaging procedures. In this review, we will address the current status of standardization in preclinical imaging, as well as potential benefits from increased levels of standardization.

Firat Kara - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Standardization of Small Animal Imaging—Current Status and Future Prospects
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Julia G. Mannheim, Firat Kara, Janine Doorduin, Kerstin Fuchs, Gerald Reischl, Sayuan Liang, Marleen Verhoye, Felix Gremse, Laura Mezzanotte, Marc C. Huisman
    Abstract:

    The benefit of small Animal imaging is directly linked to the validity and reliability of the collected data. If the data (regardless of the modality used) are not reproducible and/or reliable, then the outcome of the data is rather questionable. Therefore, standardization of the use of small Animal imaging equipment, as well as of Animal Handling in general, is of paramount importance. In a recent paper, guidance for efficient small Animal imaging quality control was offered and discussed, among others, the use of phantoms in setting up a quality control program (Osborne et al. 2016). The same phantoms can be used to standardize image quality parameters for multi-center studies or multi-scanners within center studies. In Animal experiments, the additional complexity due to Animal Handling needs to be addressed to ensure standardized imaging procedures. In this review, we will address the current status of standardization in preclinical imaging, as well as potential benefits from increased levels of standardization.

  • Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects
    Molecular imaging and biology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Julia G. Mannheim, Firat Kara, Janine Doorduin, Kerstin Fuchs, Gerald Reischl, Sayuan Liang, Marleen Verhoye, Felix Gremse, Laura Mezzanotte, Marc C. Huisman
    Abstract:

    The benefit of small Animal imaging is directly linked to the validity and reliability of the collected data. If the data (regardless of the modality used) are not reproducible and/or reliable, then the outcome of the data is rather questionable. Therefore, standardization of the use of small Animal imaging equipment, as well as of Animal Handling in general, is of paramount importance. In a recent paper, guidance for efficient small Animal imaging quality control was offered and discussed, among others, the use of phantoms in setting up a quality control program (Osborne et al. 2016). The same phantoms can be used to standardize image quality parameters for multi-center studies or multi-scanners within center studies. In Animal experiments, the additional complexity due to Animal Handling needs to be addressed to ensure standardized imaging procedures. In this review, we will address the current status of standardization in preclinical imaging, as well as potential benefits from increased levels of standardization.