The Experts below are selected from a list of 2679 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Barbara C Hansen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • ensuring due process in the iacuc and Animal Welfare setting considerations in developing noncompliance policies and procedures for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials
    The FASEB Journal, 2017
    Co-Authors: Barbara C Hansen, Sylvia Gografe, Stacy Pritt, Kai Lin Catherine Jen, Camille A Mcwhirter, Susan M Barman, Anthony G Comuzzie, Molly Greene
    Abstract:

    Every institution that is involved in research with Animals is expected to have in place policies and procedures for the management of allegations of noncompliance with the Animal Welfare Act and the U.S. Public Health Service Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. We present here a model set of recommendations for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials to ensure appropriate consideration of allegations of noncompliance with federal Animal Welfare Act regulations that carry a significant risk or specific threat to Animal Welfare. This guidance has 3 overarching aims: 1) protecting the Welfare of research Animals; 2) according fair treatment and due process to an individual accused of noncompliance; and 3) ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Through this guidance, the present work seeks to advance the cause of scientific integrity, Animal Welfare, and the public trust while recognizing and supporting the critical importance of Animal research for the betterment of the health of both humans and Animals.-Hansen, B. C., Gografe, S., Pritt, S., Jen, K.-L. C., McWhirter, C. A., Barman, S. M., Comuzzie, A., Greene, M., McNulty, J. A., Michele, D. E., Moaddab, N., Nelson, R. J., Norris, K., Uray, K. D., Banks, R., Westlund, K. N., Yates, B. J., Silverman, J., Hansen, K. D., Redman, B. Ensuring due process in the IACUC and Animal Welfare setting: considerations in developing noncompliance policies and procedures for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials.

Molly Greene - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • ensuring due process in the iacuc and Animal Welfare setting considerations in developing noncompliance policies and procedures for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials
    The FASEB Journal, 2017
    Co-Authors: Barbara C Hansen, Sylvia Gografe, Stacy Pritt, Kai Lin Catherine Jen, Camille A Mcwhirter, Susan M Barman, Anthony G Comuzzie, Molly Greene
    Abstract:

    Every institution that is involved in research with Animals is expected to have in place policies and procedures for the management of allegations of noncompliance with the Animal Welfare Act and the U.S. Public Health Service Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. We present here a model set of recommendations for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials to ensure appropriate consideration of allegations of noncompliance with federal Animal Welfare Act regulations that carry a significant risk or specific threat to Animal Welfare. This guidance has 3 overarching aims: 1) protecting the Welfare of research Animals; 2) according fair treatment and due process to an individual accused of noncompliance; and 3) ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Through this guidance, the present work seeks to advance the cause of scientific integrity, Animal Welfare, and the public trust while recognizing and supporting the critical importance of Animal research for the betterment of the health of both humans and Animals.-Hansen, B. C., Gografe, S., Pritt, S., Jen, K.-L. C., McWhirter, C. A., Barman, S. M., Comuzzie, A., Greene, M., McNulty, J. A., Michele, D. E., Moaddab, N., Nelson, R. J., Norris, K., Uray, K. D., Banks, R., Westlund, K. N., Yates, B. J., Silverman, J., Hansen, K. D., Redman, B. Ensuring due process in the IACUC and Animal Welfare setting: considerations in developing noncompliance policies and procedures for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials.

Michele, Daniel Eugene - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Ensuring due process in the IACUC and Animal Welfare setting: considerations in developing noncompliance policies and procedures for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials
    'FASEB', 2017
    Co-Authors: Hansen, Barbara C., Gografe Sylvia, Pritt Stacy, Jen, Kai‐lin Catherine, Mcwhirter, Camille A., Barman, Susan M., Comuzzie Anthony, Greene Molly, Mcnulty, Justin A., Michele, Daniel Eugene
    Abstract:

    Every institution that is involved in research with Animals is expected to have in place policies and procedures for the management of allegations of noncompliance with the Animal Welfare Act and the U.S. Public Health Service Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. We present here a model set of recommendations for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials to ensure appropriate consideration of allegations of noncompliance with federal Animal Welfare Act regulations that carry a significant risk or specific threat to Animal Welfare. This guidance has 3 overarching aims: 1) protecting the Welfare of research Animals; 2) according fair treatment and due process to an individual accused of noncompliance; and 3) ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Through this guidance, the present work seeks to advance the cause of scientific integrity, Animal Welfare, and the public trust while recognizing and supporting the critical importance of Animal research for the betterment of the health of both humans and Animals.â Hansen, B. C., Gografe, S., Pritt, S., Jen, K.â L. C., McWhirter, C. A., Barman, S. M., Comuzzie, A., Greene, M., McNulty, J. A., Michele, D. E., Moaddab, N., Nelson, R. J., Norris, K., Uray, K. D., Banks, R., Westlund, K. N., Yates, B. J., Silverman, J., Hansen, K. D., Redman, B. Ensuring due process in the IACUC and Animal Welfare setting: considerations in developing noncompliance policies and procedures for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials. FASEB J. 31, 4216â 4225 (2017). www.fasebj.orgPeer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154293/1/fsb2fj201601250r.pd

Hansen, Barbara C. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Ensuring due process in the IACUC and Animal Welfare setting: considerations in developing noncompliance policies and procedures for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials
    'FASEB', 2017
    Co-Authors: Hansen, Barbara C., Gografe Sylvia, Pritt Stacy, Jen, Kai‐lin Catherine, Mcwhirter, Camille A., Barman, Susan M., Comuzzie Anthony, Greene Molly, Mcnulty, Justin A., Michele, Daniel Eugene
    Abstract:

    Every institution that is involved in research with Animals is expected to have in place policies and procedures for the management of allegations of noncompliance with the Animal Welfare Act and the U.S. Public Health Service Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. We present here a model set of recommendations for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials to ensure appropriate consideration of allegations of noncompliance with federal Animal Welfare Act regulations that carry a significant risk or specific threat to Animal Welfare. This guidance has 3 overarching aims: 1) protecting the Welfare of research Animals; 2) according fair treatment and due process to an individual accused of noncompliance; and 3) ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Through this guidance, the present work seeks to advance the cause of scientific integrity, Animal Welfare, and the public trust while recognizing and supporting the critical importance of Animal research for the betterment of the health of both humans and Animals.â Hansen, B. C., Gografe, S., Pritt, S., Jen, K.â L. C., McWhirter, C. A., Barman, S. M., Comuzzie, A., Greene, M., McNulty, J. A., Michele, D. E., Moaddab, N., Nelson, R. J., Norris, K., Uray, K. D., Banks, R., Westlund, K. N., Yates, B. J., Silverman, J., Hansen, K. D., Redman, B. Ensuring due process in the IACUC and Animal Welfare setting: considerations in developing noncompliance policies and procedures for institutional Animal care and use committees and institutional officials. FASEB J. 31, 4216â 4225 (2017). www.fasebj.orgPeer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154293/1/fsb2fj201601250r.pd

Paul Locke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Comparison of the Canadian and US laws, regulations, policies, and systems of oversight for Animals in research
    ILAR Journal, 2016
    Co-Authors: Gilly Griffin, Paul Locke
    Abstract:

    The Canadian and United States' approaches to oversight of Animals in research are both based on the " 3Rs " principles outlined in Russell and Burch's classic text, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Each country seeks to protect the Welfare of Animals, while permitting the legitimate goals of scientific research to be attained according to the legal principles, cultures, and strengths and constraints of their jurisprudential and societal traditions. Canada is one of the most decentralized federations in the world, and regulation of Activities is based to a great extent on custom and prActice. The United States is more hierarchical and, at least with respect to laws governing Animal research, more centralized. Accordingly, the Canadian approach is rooted in the concepts of social contrActs, with a greater emphasis on guidance and policy and less reliance on legislation. No federal (national) direct legislation of laboratory Animal Welfare exists, although the federal government uses its criminal and spending authorities to shape behavior. The central feature of the Canadian system is the Canadian Council on Animal Care, which was formed to support universities and government departments involved in Animal-based science. Animal care committees play a central role in implementing the guidelines and policies in facilities that carry out Animal research. The United States has enActed two federal (national) laws applicable to Animals in research. The Animal Welfare Act is a more traditional, command-and-control law that gives authority to the US Department of Agriculture to promulgate regulations, inspect facilities, and enforce violations. The Health Research Extension Act, which amended the US Public Health Services (PHS) Act, applies to any Activity conducted or supported by the PHS, including research efforts supported by the US National Institutes of Health. It is largely nonregulatory and establishes a system of assurances and policies that covered research facilities must follow. States play only a minor role in Animal research protection. As in Canada, institutional Animal care and use committees are tasked with self-regulation of Activities that use Animals for research.