The Experts below are selected from a list of 360 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

H Fernandez - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • comparison between trans obturator trans vaginal mesh and traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of Anterior vaginal wall prolapse results of a french rct
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013
    Co-Authors: R De Tayrac, Arnaud Cornille, Georges Eglin, O Guilbaud, Aslam Mansoor, Sandrine Alonso, H Fernandez
    Abstract:

    To compare the efficacy of a collagen-coated polypropylene mesh and Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study conducted between April 2005 and December 2009. The principal endpoint was the recurrence rate of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints consisted of functional results and mesh-related morbidity. One hundred and forty-seven patients were included, randomized and analyzed: 72 in the Anterior Colporrhaphy group and 75 in the mesh group. The anatomical success rate was significantly higher in the mesh group (89 %) than in the Colporrhaphy group (64 %) (p = 0.0006). Anatomical and functional recurrence was also less frequent in the mesh group (31.3 % vs 52.2 %, p = 0.007). Two patients (2.8 %) were reoperated on in the Colporrhaphy group for Anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence. No significant difference was noted regarding minor complications. An erosion rate of 9.5 % was noted. De novo dyspareunia occurred in 1/14 patients in the Colporrhaphy group and in 3/13 patients in the mesh group. An analysis of the quality of life questionnaires showed an overall improvement in both groups, with no statistical difference between them. Satisfaction rates were high in both groups (92 % in the Colporrhaphy group and 96 % in the mesh group). Trans-obturator Ugytex® mesh used to treat Anterior vaginal wall prolapse gives better 1-year anatomical results than traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy, but with small a increase in morbidity in the mesh group.

  • comparison between trans obturator trans vaginal mesh and traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of Anterior vaginal wall prolapse results of a french rct
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013
    Co-Authors: R De Tayrac, Arnaud Cornille, Georges Eglin, O Guilbaud, Aslam Mansoor, Sandrine Alonso, H Fernandez
    Abstract:

    Introduction and hypothesis To compare the efficacy of a collagen-coated polypropylene mesh and Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

R De Tayrac - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • comparison between trans obturator trans vaginal mesh and traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of Anterior vaginal wall prolapse results of a french rct
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013
    Co-Authors: R De Tayrac, Arnaud Cornille, Georges Eglin, O Guilbaud, Aslam Mansoor, Sandrine Alonso, H Fernandez
    Abstract:

    To compare the efficacy of a collagen-coated polypropylene mesh and Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study conducted between April 2005 and December 2009. The principal endpoint was the recurrence rate of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints consisted of functional results and mesh-related morbidity. One hundred and forty-seven patients were included, randomized and analyzed: 72 in the Anterior Colporrhaphy group and 75 in the mesh group. The anatomical success rate was significantly higher in the mesh group (89 %) than in the Colporrhaphy group (64 %) (p = 0.0006). Anatomical and functional recurrence was also less frequent in the mesh group (31.3 % vs 52.2 %, p = 0.007). Two patients (2.8 %) were reoperated on in the Colporrhaphy group for Anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence. No significant difference was noted regarding minor complications. An erosion rate of 9.5 % was noted. De novo dyspareunia occurred in 1/14 patients in the Colporrhaphy group and in 3/13 patients in the mesh group. An analysis of the quality of life questionnaires showed an overall improvement in both groups, with no statistical difference between them. Satisfaction rates were high in both groups (92 % in the Colporrhaphy group and 96 % in the mesh group). Trans-obturator Ugytex® mesh used to treat Anterior vaginal wall prolapse gives better 1-year anatomical results than traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy, but with small a increase in morbidity in the mesh group.

  • comparison between trans obturator trans vaginal mesh and traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of Anterior vaginal wall prolapse results of a french rct
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013
    Co-Authors: R De Tayrac, Arnaud Cornille, Georges Eglin, O Guilbaud, Aslam Mansoor, Sandrine Alonso, H Fernandez
    Abstract:

    Introduction and hypothesis To compare the efficacy of a collagen-coated polypropylene mesh and Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

  • comparison of Anterior Colporrhaphy versus bologna procedure in women with genuine stress incontinence
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2002
    Co-Authors: R De Tayrac, R Villet
    Abstract:

    The aim of the study was to compare the Anterior Colporrhaphy and the Bologna operation for the treatment of Anterior vaginal wall prolapse associated with genuine urinary incontinence (GSI). Sixty-two women undergoing surgery for GSI and concurrent grade 2–3 cystocele were the subjects of the study. Anterior colporraphy was performed on 31 women (group A) and the Bologna operation on another 31 (group B). The mean follow-up was 3 years (range 2–7). Perioperative complications, including urinary tract infections, occurred in 16% of group A versus 42% of group B (P<0.001). Anatomic success regarding the prolapse was, respectively, 92.9% (26/28) and 84.6% (22/26) (P= 0.25). Subjective cure rates of GSI (patient history) were 57.1% in group A (16/28) and 87% in group B (23/26) (P<0.05). Objective cure rates of GSI (negative stress test result) were 53.6% in group A (15/28) and 84.6% in group B (22/26) (P<0.02). We concluded that the Bologna operation was more effective for treating GSI associated with Anterior vaginal prolapse than was Anterior colporraphy, with an increased rate of morbidity and postoperative urinary retention.

Emil Nussler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Aslam Mansoor - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • comparison between trans obturator trans vaginal mesh and traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of Anterior vaginal wall prolapse results of a french rct
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013
    Co-Authors: R De Tayrac, Arnaud Cornille, Georges Eglin, O Guilbaud, Aslam Mansoor, Sandrine Alonso, H Fernandez
    Abstract:

    To compare the efficacy of a collagen-coated polypropylene mesh and Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study conducted between April 2005 and December 2009. The principal endpoint was the recurrence rate of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints consisted of functional results and mesh-related morbidity. One hundred and forty-seven patients were included, randomized and analyzed: 72 in the Anterior Colporrhaphy group and 75 in the mesh group. The anatomical success rate was significantly higher in the mesh group (89 %) than in the Colporrhaphy group (64 %) (p = 0.0006). Anatomical and functional recurrence was also less frequent in the mesh group (31.3 % vs 52.2 %, p = 0.007). Two patients (2.8 %) were reoperated on in the Colporrhaphy group for Anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence. No significant difference was noted regarding minor complications. An erosion rate of 9.5 % was noted. De novo dyspareunia occurred in 1/14 patients in the Colporrhaphy group and in 3/13 patients in the mesh group. An analysis of the quality of life questionnaires showed an overall improvement in both groups, with no statistical difference between them. Satisfaction rates were high in both groups (92 % in the Colporrhaphy group and 96 % in the mesh group). Trans-obturator Ugytex® mesh used to treat Anterior vaginal wall prolapse gives better 1-year anatomical results than traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy, but with small a increase in morbidity in the mesh group.

  • comparison between trans obturator trans vaginal mesh and traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of Anterior vaginal wall prolapse results of a french rct
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013
    Co-Authors: R De Tayrac, Arnaud Cornille, Georges Eglin, O Guilbaud, Aslam Mansoor, Sandrine Alonso, H Fernandez
    Abstract:

    Introduction and hypothesis To compare the efficacy of a collagen-coated polypropylene mesh and Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Georges Eglin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • comparison between trans obturator trans vaginal mesh and traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of Anterior vaginal wall prolapse results of a french rct
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013
    Co-Authors: R De Tayrac, Arnaud Cornille, Georges Eglin, O Guilbaud, Aslam Mansoor, Sandrine Alonso, H Fernandez
    Abstract:

    To compare the efficacy of a collagen-coated polypropylene mesh and Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study conducted between April 2005 and December 2009. The principal endpoint was the recurrence rate of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints consisted of functional results and mesh-related morbidity. One hundred and forty-seven patients were included, randomized and analyzed: 72 in the Anterior Colporrhaphy group and 75 in the mesh group. The anatomical success rate was significantly higher in the mesh group (89 %) than in the Colporrhaphy group (64 %) (p = 0.0006). Anatomical and functional recurrence was also less frequent in the mesh group (31.3 % vs 52.2 %, p = 0.007). Two patients (2.8 %) were reoperated on in the Colporrhaphy group for Anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence. No significant difference was noted regarding minor complications. An erosion rate of 9.5 % was noted. De novo dyspareunia occurred in 1/14 patients in the Colporrhaphy group and in 3/13 patients in the mesh group. An analysis of the quality of life questionnaires showed an overall improvement in both groups, with no statistical difference between them. Satisfaction rates were high in both groups (92 % in the Colporrhaphy group and 96 % in the mesh group). Trans-obturator Ugytex® mesh used to treat Anterior vaginal wall prolapse gives better 1-year anatomical results than traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy, but with small a increase in morbidity in the mesh group.

  • comparison between trans obturator trans vaginal mesh and traditional Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of Anterior vaginal wall prolapse results of a french rct
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013
    Co-Authors: R De Tayrac, Arnaud Cornille, Georges Eglin, O Guilbaud, Aslam Mansoor, Sandrine Alonso, H Fernandez
    Abstract:

    Introduction and hypothesis To compare the efficacy of a collagen-coated polypropylene mesh and Anterior Colporrhaphy in the treatment of stage 2 or more Anterior vaginal wall prolapse.