The Experts below are selected from a list of 441 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Bharati Mishra - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Hybrid Approach of Using Anycast Addressing With Zone Routing Protocol
2014Co-Authors: Tapaswini Dash, Bharati MishraAbstract:Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) is a hybrid protocol that combines the advantages of both the proactive and reactive protocols. It is classified as: Intra Zone Routing, which uses hop count of the N-neighbors using proactive techniques and Inter Zone Routing, which includes the rest of the network excluding the N-neighbors using reactive techniques. In Anycast routing, the packets are routed to the most nearest Anycast group member. In this paper, a literature review about Zone Routing Protocol and Anycast Addressing is presented along with the concept where we propose to use Anycast Addressing in Zone Routing Protocol assuming that the destination as a member of Anycast Address, is proposed. This idea is proposed for the consistent improvement of performance of Zone Routing Protocol
-
Zone Routing Protocol Using Anycast Addressing For Ad-Hoc Network
Engg Journals Publications, 2012Co-Authors: Tapaswini Dash, Bharati MishraAbstract:Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) is a hybrid protocol that combines the advantages of both the proactive and reactive protocols. It is classified as: Intra Zone Routing, which uses hop count of the Nneighbors using proactive techniques and Inter Zone Routing, which includes the rest of the network excluding the N-neighbors using reactive techniques. In Anycast routing, the packets are routed to themost nearest Anycast group member. In this paper, the concept of Anycast is used in Zone Routing Protocol assuming the destination as a member of Anycast Address, hence the packet can be sent to anyof the other member of the Anycast group which is located nearer to the the source node. In this paper a comparative study is also done among hybrid protocol (Zone Routing Protocol), and the proposed idea of using Anycast Addressing with Zone Routing Protocol where the proposed idea performs more efficiently
Masayuki Murata - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Hiroshi Kitamura
2013Co-Authors: Satoshi Matsunaga, Masayuki MurataAbstract:Abstract: Today, the use of Anycast Address is quite limited. One of the reasons is that there is no routing protocol providing a global Anycasting service. In this paper we design and implement a new Anycast routing protocol called PIA-SM (Protocol Independent Anycast – Sparse Mode). We focus on PIM-SM (Protocol Independent Multicast – Sparse Mode), which is one of multicast routing protocols available now, to develop an Anycast routing protocol, because Anycast and multicast have many similar properties. We modified PIM-SM based on differences between multicast and Anycast. We next describe the technical issues to be solved in the implementation of PIA-SM. We also show some experimental results to demonstrate PIA-SM, and verify that PIA-SM enables routers to forward an Anycast packet to an appropriate node o
-
Design and Implementation of IPv6 Anycast Routing Protocol: PIA-SM
2013Co-Authors: Satoshi Matsunaga, Shingo Ata, Hiroshi Kitamura, Masayuki MurataAbstract:Abstract — Today, the use of Anycast Address is quite limited. One of the reasons is because there is no routing protocol providing a global Anycasting service. In this paper we design and implement a new Anycast routing protocol called PIA-S
-
Protocol design for Anycast communication in IPv6 network
2003Co-Authors: Satoshi Doi, Shingo Ata, Hiroshi Kitamura, Masayuki Murata, Hideo MiyaharaAbstract:Abstract — Although Anycast communication supports service– oriented Addresses many of its current definitions in IPv6 are unclear. Furthermore, since there are no protocol standards or even consensus on routing control, inter–segment Anycast communications are not yet available. In this paper, we first discuss these problems and solutions. Based on our findings, we present the Anycast Address Resolving Protocol (AARP) to establish TCP connections with a specific Anycast Address and propose a routing protocol for inter–segment Anycasts. Our proposed architecture makes Anycast Addresses more useful without (or at most minimum) modifications/extensions to existing applications and/or upper–layer protocols. I
Tapaswini Dash - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Hybrid Approach of Using Anycast Addressing With Zone Routing Protocol
2014Co-Authors: Tapaswini Dash, Bharati MishraAbstract:Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) is a hybrid protocol that combines the advantages of both the proactive and reactive protocols. It is classified as: Intra Zone Routing, which uses hop count of the N-neighbors using proactive techniques and Inter Zone Routing, which includes the rest of the network excluding the N-neighbors using reactive techniques. In Anycast routing, the packets are routed to the most nearest Anycast group member. In this paper, a literature review about Zone Routing Protocol and Anycast Addressing is presented along with the concept where we propose to use Anycast Addressing in Zone Routing Protocol assuming that the destination as a member of Anycast Address, is proposed. This idea is proposed for the consistent improvement of performance of Zone Routing Protocol
-
Zone Routing Protocol Using Anycast Addressing For Ad-Hoc Network
Engg Journals Publications, 2012Co-Authors: Tapaswini Dash, Bharati MishraAbstract:Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) is a hybrid protocol that combines the advantages of both the proactive and reactive protocols. It is classified as: Intra Zone Routing, which uses hop count of the Nneighbors using proactive techniques and Inter Zone Routing, which includes the rest of the network excluding the N-neighbors using reactive techniques. In Anycast routing, the packets are routed to themost nearest Anycast group member. In this paper, the concept of Anycast is used in Zone Routing Protocol assuming the destination as a member of Anycast Address, hence the packet can be sent to anyof the other member of the Anycast group which is located nearer to the the source node. In this paper a comparative study is also done among hybrid protocol (Zone Routing Protocol), and the proposed idea of using Anycast Addressing with Zone Routing Protocol where the proposed idea performs more efficiently
Li Zhang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
IPv6 Anycast routing supported by extending OSPFv3
jisuanji gongchengcomputer engineering, 2005Co-Authors: Wang Yue, Li Zhang, Han Zhinan, Yan WeiAbstract:The paper analyzes the differences between IPv6 Anycast and Unicast. OSPFv3 can not support Anycast routing automatically as the semantics of Anycast is not taken into account. It proposes some methods to extend OSPFv3, which includes Anycast Address representation, Anycast topology region checking and Anycast routing computation. Also, it makes the corresponding modifications on Zebra OSPFvS. The result on testbed shows the methods are feasible and correct.EI05137-1393
-
An efficient Anycast routing protocol based on multi-metrics
2004Co-Authors: Li Zhang, Yan Wei, Jia Weijia, Li Xiao-mingAbstract:Anycast communication becomes popular recently as it can be used to provide effective routing to server members in a replicated server group that is represented by an Anycast Address. This paper proposes a novel Anycast routing protocol called Anycast Routing protocol based on Multi-Metrics (ARMM). ARMM protocol sets up the routing by taking hop number, data transmission delay, residual bandwidth, and server load as the server and path selection criteria. ARMM differs from other approaches as it uses values of bandwidth and delay on the direction from servers (Anycast members) to clients, rather than the normal direction from clients to servers. So ARMM can select the best server/path with sufficient network resource (say bandwidth etc) for server data transmission to clients. Simulation results demonstrated that our protocol performs better than those protocols using conventional client to server routing approach in case that the servers may require to transmit a large volume of flows to the clients.EI
Yan Wei - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
IPv6 Anycast routing supported by extending OSPFv3
jisuanji gongchengcomputer engineering, 2005Co-Authors: Wang Yue, Li Zhang, Han Zhinan, Yan WeiAbstract:The paper analyzes the differences between IPv6 Anycast and Unicast. OSPFv3 can not support Anycast routing automatically as the semantics of Anycast is not taken into account. It proposes some methods to extend OSPFv3, which includes Anycast Address representation, Anycast topology region checking and Anycast routing computation. Also, it makes the corresponding modifications on Zebra OSPFvS. The result on testbed shows the methods are feasible and correct.EI05137-1393
-
An efficient Anycast routing protocol based on multi-metrics
2004Co-Authors: Li Zhang, Yan Wei, Jia Weijia, Li Xiao-mingAbstract:Anycast communication becomes popular recently as it can be used to provide effective routing to server members in a replicated server group that is represented by an Anycast Address. This paper proposes a novel Anycast routing protocol called Anycast Routing protocol based on Multi-Metrics (ARMM). ARMM protocol sets up the routing by taking hop number, data transmission delay, residual bandwidth, and server load as the server and path selection criteria. ARMM differs from other approaches as it uses values of bandwidth and delay on the direction from servers (Anycast members) to clients, rather than the normal direction from clients to servers. So ARMM can select the best server/path with sufficient network resource (say bandwidth etc) for server data transmission to clients. Simulation results demonstrated that our protocol performs better than those protocols using conventional client to server routing approach in case that the servers may require to transmit a large volume of flows to the clients.EI