The Experts below are selected from a list of 1296891 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Buijs J.c.a.m. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Environmental permit Application Process (‘WABO’), CoSeLoG project – Municipality 2
Eindhoven University of Technology, 2014Co-Authors: Buijs J.c.a.m.Abstract:This data originates from the CoSeLoG project executed under NWO project number 638.001.211. Within the CoSeLoG project the (dis)similarities between several Processes of different municipalities in the Netherlands has been investigated. This data is part of a collection of 5 event logs that record the execution of a building permit Application Process in five different anonymous municipalities. The recording of these Processes is comparable which means that activity labels in the different event logs refer to the same activities performed in the five municipalities. The event log contains additional data on the case/trace and event level. In total there are 16 trace level attributes which include the parts the permit consists of, the planned end date and the responsible actor. The event attributes contain the activity label, the timestamp of execution and the human resource involved. Furthermore, information regarding the planned date of execution and the due date is included. Additionally events may contain additional Process data. Some attributes contain Dutch terms and phrases
-
Environmental permit Application Process (‘WABO’), CoSeLoG project – Municipality 4
Eindhoven University of Technology, 2014Co-Authors: Buijs J.c.a.m.Abstract:This data originates from the CoSeLoG project executed under NWO project number 638.001.211. Within the CoSeLoG project the (dis)similarities between several Processes of different municipalities in the Netherlands has been investigated. This data is part of a collection of 5 event logs that record the execution of a building permit Application Process in five different anonymous municipalities. The recording of these Processes is comparable which means that activity labels in the different event logs refer to the same activities performed in the five municipalities. The event log contains additional data on the case/trace and event level. In total there are 16 trace level attributes which include the parts the permit consists of, the planned end date and the responsible actor. The event attributes contain the activity label, the timestamp of execution and the human resource involved. Furthermore, information regarding the planned date of execution and the due date is included. Additionally events may contain additional Process data. Some attributes contain Dutch terms and phrases
-
Environmental permit Application Process (‘WABO’), CoSeLoG project – Municipality 5
Eindhoven University of Technology, 2014Co-Authors: Buijs J.c.a.m.Abstract:This data originates from the CoSeLoG project executed under NWO project number 638.001.211. Within the CoSeLoG project the (dis)similarities between several Processes of different municipalities in the Netherlands has been investigated. This data is part of a collection of 5 event logs that record the execution of a building permit Application Process in five different anonymous municipalities. The recording of these Processes is comparable which means that activity labels in the different event logs refer to the same activities performed in the five municipalities. The event log contains additional data on the case/trace and event level. In total there are 16 trace level attributes which include the parts the permit consists of, the planned end date and the responsible actor. The event attributes contain the activity label, the timestamp of execution and the human resource involved. Furthermore, information regarding the planned date of execution and the due date is included. Additionally events may contain additional Process data. Some attributes contain Dutch terms and phrases
-
Environmental permit Application Process (‘WABO’), CoSeLoG project – Municipality 1
Eindhoven University of Technology, 2014Co-Authors: Buijs J.c.a.m.Abstract:This data originates from the CoSeLoG project executed under NWO project number 638.001.211. Within the CoSeLoG project the (dis)similarities between several Processes of different municipalities in the Netherlands has been investigated. This data is part of a collection of 5 event logs that record the execution of a building permit Application Process in five different anonymous municipalities. The recording of these Processes is comparable which means that activity labels in the different event logs refer to the same activities performed in the five municipalities. The event log contains additional data on the case/trace and event level. In total there are 16 trace level attributes which include the parts the permit consists of, the planned end date and the responsible actor. The event attributes contain the activity label, the timestamp of execution and the human resource involved. Furthermore, information regarding the planned date of execution and the due date is included. Additionally events may contain additional Process data. Some attributes contain Dutch terms and phrases
-
Environmental permit Application Process (‘WABO’), CoSeLoG project – Municipality 3
Eindhoven University of Technology, 2014Co-Authors: Buijs J.c.a.m.Abstract:This data originates from the CoSeLoG project executed under NWO project number 638.001.211. Within the CoSeLoG project the (dis)similarities between several Processes of different municipalities in the Netherlands has been investigated. This data is part of a collection of 5 event logs that record the execution of a building permit Application Process in five different anonymous municipalities. The recording of these Processes is comparable which means that activity labels in the different event logs refer to the same activities performed in the five municipalities. The event log contains additional data on the case/trace and event level. In total there are 16 trace level attributes which include the parts the permit consists of, the planned end date and the responsible actor. The event attributes contain the activity label, the timestamp of execution and the human resource involved. Furthermore, information regarding the planned date of execution and the due date is included. Additionally events may contain additional Process data. Some attributes contain Dutch terms and phrases
Edward Akelman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
accredited hand surgery fellowship web sites analysis of content and accessibility
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 2015Co-Authors: Samir K Trehan, Nathan T Morrell, Edward AkelmanAbstract:Purpose To assess the accessibility and content of accredited hand surgery fellowship Web sites. Methods A list of all accredited hand surgery fellowships was obtained from the online database of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH). Fellowship program information on the ASSH Web site was recorded. All fellowship program Web sites were located via Google search. Fellowship program Web sites were analyzed for accessibility and content in 3 domains: program overview, Application information/recruitment, and education. Results At the time of this study, there were 81 accredited hand surgery fellowships with 169 available positions. Thirty of 81 programs (37%) had a functional link on the ASSH online hand surgery fellowship directory; however, Google search identified 78 Web sites. Three programs did not have a Web site. Analysis of content revealed that most Web sites contained contact information, whereas information regarding the anticipated clinical, research, and educational experiences during fellowship was less often present. Furthermore, information regarding past and present fellows, salary, Application Process/requirements, call responsibilities, and case volume was frequently lacking. Overall, 52 of 81 programs (64%) had the minimal online information required for residents to independently complete the fellowship Application Process. Conclusions Hand fellowship program Web sites could be accessed either via the ASSH online directory or Google search, except for 3 programs that did not have Web sites. Although most fellowship program Web sites contained contact information, other content such as Application information/recruitment and education, was less frequently present. Clinical relevance This study provides comparative data regarding the clinical and educational experiences outlined on hand fellowship program Web sites that are of relevance to residents, fellows, and academic hand surgeons. This study also draws attention to various ways in which the hand surgery fellowship Application Process can be made more user-friendly and efficient.
Meredith Osterman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Hand Surgery Fellowship Application Process: Expectations, Logistics, and Costs
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 2015Co-Authors: Clifton Meals, Meredith OstermanAbstract:Purpose To investigate expectations, logistics, and costs relevant to the hand surgery fellowship Application Process. We sought to discover (1) what both applicants and program directors are seeking, (2) what both parties have to offer, (3) how both parties collect information about each other, and (4) the costs incurred in arranging each match. Methods We conducted on-line surveys of hand surgery fellowship applicants for appointment in 2015 and of current fellowship program directors. Results Sixty-two applicants and 41 program directors completed the survey. Results revealed applicants' demographic characteristics, qualifications, method of ranking hand fellowship programs, costs incurred (both monetary and opportunity) during the Application Process, ultimate match status, and suggestions for change. Results also revealed program directors' program demographics, rationale for offering interviews and favorably ranking applicants, Application-related logistical details, costs incurred (both monetary and opportunity) during the Application Process, and suggestions for change. Conclusions Applicants for hand surgery fellowship training are primarily interested in a potential program's academic reputation, emphasis on orthopedic surgery, and location. The typical, successfully matched applicant was a 30-year-old male orthopedic resident with 3 publications to his credit. Applicants rely on peers and Web sites for information about fellowships. Fellowship directors are primarily seeking applicants recommended by other experienced surgeons and with positive personality traits. The typical fellowship director offers a single year of orthopedic-based fellowship training to 2 fellows per year and relies on a common Application and in-person interviews to collect information about applicants. Applicants appear to be more concerned than directors about the current state of the match Process. Applicants and directors alike incur heavy costs, in both dollars and opportunity, to arrange each match. A nuanced understanding of the match Process suggests specific changes and may help reduce these costs. Type of study/level of evidence Economic and decision analysis V.
Xiaojun Zeng - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
dotted chart and control flow analysis for a loan Application Process
Business Process Management, 2012Co-Authors: Thomas Molka, Wasif Gilani, Xiaojun ZengAbstract:We summarise our approach and results of analysing a real-life event log taken from a loan Application Process in a Dutch financial institute. We mine the control-flow model and analyse different variants of the Process statistically and with dotted charts. This allows us to conclude performance properties of the historic execution of the Process. Furthermore we examine the resources assigned to different Process steps.
Clifton Meals - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Hand Surgery Fellowship Application Process: Expectations, Logistics, and Costs
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 2015Co-Authors: Clifton Meals, Meredith OstermanAbstract:Purpose To investigate expectations, logistics, and costs relevant to the hand surgery fellowship Application Process. We sought to discover (1) what both applicants and program directors are seeking, (2) what both parties have to offer, (3) how both parties collect information about each other, and (4) the costs incurred in arranging each match. Methods We conducted on-line surveys of hand surgery fellowship applicants for appointment in 2015 and of current fellowship program directors. Results Sixty-two applicants and 41 program directors completed the survey. Results revealed applicants' demographic characteristics, qualifications, method of ranking hand fellowship programs, costs incurred (both monetary and opportunity) during the Application Process, ultimate match status, and suggestions for change. Results also revealed program directors' program demographics, rationale for offering interviews and favorably ranking applicants, Application-related logistical details, costs incurred (both monetary and opportunity) during the Application Process, and suggestions for change. Conclusions Applicants for hand surgery fellowship training are primarily interested in a potential program's academic reputation, emphasis on orthopedic surgery, and location. The typical, successfully matched applicant was a 30-year-old male orthopedic resident with 3 publications to his credit. Applicants rely on peers and Web sites for information about fellowships. Fellowship directors are primarily seeking applicants recommended by other experienced surgeons and with positive personality traits. The typical fellowship director offers a single year of orthopedic-based fellowship training to 2 fellows per year and relies on a common Application and in-person interviews to collect information about applicants. Applicants appear to be more concerned than directors about the current state of the match Process. Applicants and directors alike incur heavy costs, in both dollars and opportunity, to arrange each match. A nuanced understanding of the match Process suggests specific changes and may help reduce these costs. Type of study/level of evidence Economic and decision analysis V.