The Experts below are selected from a list of 6954 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Carlos Alberto Braganaa Pereira - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • meta analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity Arterial Insufficiency
    Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
    Co-Authors: Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Maximiano Tadeu Villa Albers, Francisco Cardoso Brochadoneto, Marcello Romiti, Carlos Alberto Braganaa Pereira
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: In femoropopliteal bypass surgery, the use of saphenous vein grafts is preferable, but synthetic grafts are widely used above the knee. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the long-term patency of femoropopliteal bypass grafts classified as above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, above-knee saphenous vein, or below-knee saphenous vein. METHODS: Studies published from 1986 through 2004 were identified from electronic databases and reference lists; 73 articles contributed 1 or more series that used survival analysis, assessed femoropopliteal bypasses in one of the foregoing configurations, reported a 1-year graft patency rate, and included at least 30 bypasses. The series with a predominance of claudicant patients were included in meta-analysis C, and the series in which critical ischemia predominated were included in meta-analysis CI. Pooled survival curves of graft patency were constructed. RESULTS: In meta-analysis C, the pooled primary graft patency was 57.4% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 77.2% for above-knee vein, and 64.8% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 3, 4, and 5 years (P .05). In meta-analysis CI, the pooled primary graft patency was 48.3% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 69.4% for above-knee vein, and 68.9% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts until 4 years (P < .05). The corresponding pooled secondary graft patency was 54.0%, 71.9%, and 77.8%, respectively, with a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 2, 3, and 4 years (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The great saphenous vein performs better than polytetrafluoroethylene in femoropopliteal bypass grafting and should be used whenever possible.

  • meta analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity Arterial Insufficiency
    Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
    Co-Authors: Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Maximiano Tadeu Villa Albers, Francisco Cardoso Brochadoneto, Marcello Romiti, Carlos Alberto Braganaa Pereira
    Abstract:

    Background In femoropopliteal bypass surgery, the use of saphenous vein grafts is preferable, but synthetic grafts are widely used above the knee. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the long-term patency of femoropopliteal bypass grafts classified as above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, above-knee saphenous vein, or below-knee saphenous vein. Methods Studies published from 1986 through 2004 were identified from electronic databases and reference lists; 73 articles contributed 1 or more series that used survival analysis, assessed femoropopliteal bypasses in one of the foregoing configurations, reported a 1-year graft patency rate, and included at least 30 bypasses. The series with a predominance of claudicant patients were included in meta-analysis C, and the series in which critical ischemia predominated were included in meta-analysis CI. Pooled survival curves of graft patency were constructed. Results In meta-analysis C, the pooled primary graft patency was 57.4% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 77.2% for above-knee vein, and 64.8% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 3, 4, and 5 years (P .05). In meta-analysis CI, the pooled primary graft patency was 48.3% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 69.4% for above-knee vein, and 68.9% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts until 4 years (P Conclusions The great saphenous vein performs better than polytetrafluoroethylene in femoropopliteal bypass grafting and should be used whenever possible.

Carlos Eduardo Pereira - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • meta analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity Arterial Insufficiency
    Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
    Co-Authors: Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Maximiano Tadeu Villa Albers, Francisco Cardoso Brochadoneto, Marcello Romiti, Carlos Alberto Braganaa Pereira
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: In femoropopliteal bypass surgery, the use of saphenous vein grafts is preferable, but synthetic grafts are widely used above the knee. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the long-term patency of femoropopliteal bypass grafts classified as above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, above-knee saphenous vein, or below-knee saphenous vein. METHODS: Studies published from 1986 through 2004 were identified from electronic databases and reference lists; 73 articles contributed 1 or more series that used survival analysis, assessed femoropopliteal bypasses in one of the foregoing configurations, reported a 1-year graft patency rate, and included at least 30 bypasses. The series with a predominance of claudicant patients were included in meta-analysis C, and the series in which critical ischemia predominated were included in meta-analysis CI. Pooled survival curves of graft patency were constructed. RESULTS: In meta-analysis C, the pooled primary graft patency was 57.4% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 77.2% for above-knee vein, and 64.8% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 3, 4, and 5 years (P .05). In meta-analysis CI, the pooled primary graft patency was 48.3% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 69.4% for above-knee vein, and 68.9% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts until 4 years (P < .05). The corresponding pooled secondary graft patency was 54.0%, 71.9%, and 77.8%, respectively, with a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 2, 3, and 4 years (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The great saphenous vein performs better than polytetrafluoroethylene in femoropopliteal bypass grafting and should be used whenever possible.

  • meta analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity Arterial Insufficiency
    Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
    Co-Authors: Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Maximiano Tadeu Villa Albers, Francisco Cardoso Brochadoneto, Marcello Romiti, Carlos Alberto Braganaa Pereira
    Abstract:

    Background In femoropopliteal bypass surgery, the use of saphenous vein grafts is preferable, but synthetic grafts are widely used above the knee. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the long-term patency of femoropopliteal bypass grafts classified as above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, above-knee saphenous vein, or below-knee saphenous vein. Methods Studies published from 1986 through 2004 were identified from electronic databases and reference lists; 73 articles contributed 1 or more series that used survival analysis, assessed femoropopliteal bypasses in one of the foregoing configurations, reported a 1-year graft patency rate, and included at least 30 bypasses. The series with a predominance of claudicant patients were included in meta-analysis C, and the series in which critical ischemia predominated were included in meta-analysis CI. Pooled survival curves of graft patency were constructed. Results In meta-analysis C, the pooled primary graft patency was 57.4% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 77.2% for above-knee vein, and 64.8% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 3, 4, and 5 years (P .05). In meta-analysis CI, the pooled primary graft patency was 48.3% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 69.4% for above-knee vein, and 68.9% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts until 4 years (P Conclusions The great saphenous vein performs better than polytetrafluoroethylene in femoropopliteal bypass grafting and should be used whenever possible.

Julie E. Park - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap Salvage Technique Using Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Graft.
    Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2018
    Co-Authors: Rebecca M. Garza, Deana S. Shenaq, David H. Song, Julie E. Park
    Abstract:

    : Superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap salvage remains challenging, particularly in cases of Arterial Insufficiency due to vessel spasm, pedicle kinking, or thrombosis. The already small, short SIEA pedicle, in addition to its inherent tendency toward spasm, renders the SIEA flap more difficult to manage when anastomotic revision is required. Furthermore, Arterial thrombosis will cause dilation of the internal mammary artery, exacerbating vessel mismatch. In our previously published experience with 145 SIEA flaps, no flap with postoperative Arterial thrombosis was salvageable. Following this experience, a new salvage technique using deep inferior epigastric artery grafts has been utilized and is described here.

Maximiano Tadeu Villa Albers - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • meta analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity Arterial Insufficiency
    Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
    Co-Authors: Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Maximiano Tadeu Villa Albers, Francisco Cardoso Brochadoneto, Marcello Romiti, Carlos Alberto Braganaa Pereira
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: In femoropopliteal bypass surgery, the use of saphenous vein grafts is preferable, but synthetic grafts are widely used above the knee. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the long-term patency of femoropopliteal bypass grafts classified as above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, above-knee saphenous vein, or below-knee saphenous vein. METHODS: Studies published from 1986 through 2004 were identified from electronic databases and reference lists; 73 articles contributed 1 or more series that used survival analysis, assessed femoropopliteal bypasses in one of the foregoing configurations, reported a 1-year graft patency rate, and included at least 30 bypasses. The series with a predominance of claudicant patients were included in meta-analysis C, and the series in which critical ischemia predominated were included in meta-analysis CI. Pooled survival curves of graft patency were constructed. RESULTS: In meta-analysis C, the pooled primary graft patency was 57.4% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 77.2% for above-knee vein, and 64.8% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 3, 4, and 5 years (P .05). In meta-analysis CI, the pooled primary graft patency was 48.3% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 69.4% for above-knee vein, and 68.9% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts until 4 years (P < .05). The corresponding pooled secondary graft patency was 54.0%, 71.9%, and 77.8%, respectively, with a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 2, 3, and 4 years (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The great saphenous vein performs better than polytetrafluoroethylene in femoropopliteal bypass grafting and should be used whenever possible.

  • meta analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity Arterial Insufficiency
    Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
    Co-Authors: Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Maximiano Tadeu Villa Albers, Francisco Cardoso Brochadoneto, Marcello Romiti, Carlos Alberto Braganaa Pereira
    Abstract:

    Background In femoropopliteal bypass surgery, the use of saphenous vein grafts is preferable, but synthetic grafts are widely used above the knee. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the long-term patency of femoropopliteal bypass grafts classified as above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, above-knee saphenous vein, or below-knee saphenous vein. Methods Studies published from 1986 through 2004 were identified from electronic databases and reference lists; 73 articles contributed 1 or more series that used survival analysis, assessed femoropopliteal bypasses in one of the foregoing configurations, reported a 1-year graft patency rate, and included at least 30 bypasses. The series with a predominance of claudicant patients were included in meta-analysis C, and the series in which critical ischemia predominated were included in meta-analysis CI. Pooled survival curves of graft patency were constructed. Results In meta-analysis C, the pooled primary graft patency was 57.4% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 77.2% for above-knee vein, and 64.8% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 3, 4, and 5 years (P .05). In meta-analysis CI, the pooled primary graft patency was 48.3% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 69.4% for above-knee vein, and 68.9% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts until 4 years (P Conclusions The great saphenous vein performs better than polytetrafluoroethylene in femoropopliteal bypass grafting and should be used whenever possible.

Francisco Cardoso Brochadoneto - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • meta analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity Arterial Insufficiency
    Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
    Co-Authors: Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Maximiano Tadeu Villa Albers, Francisco Cardoso Brochadoneto, Marcello Romiti, Carlos Alberto Braganaa Pereira
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: In femoropopliteal bypass surgery, the use of saphenous vein grafts is preferable, but synthetic grafts are widely used above the knee. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the long-term patency of femoropopliteal bypass grafts classified as above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, above-knee saphenous vein, or below-knee saphenous vein. METHODS: Studies published from 1986 through 2004 were identified from electronic databases and reference lists; 73 articles contributed 1 or more series that used survival analysis, assessed femoropopliteal bypasses in one of the foregoing configurations, reported a 1-year graft patency rate, and included at least 30 bypasses. The series with a predominance of claudicant patients were included in meta-analysis C, and the series in which critical ischemia predominated were included in meta-analysis CI. Pooled survival curves of graft patency were constructed. RESULTS: In meta-analysis C, the pooled primary graft patency was 57.4% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 77.2% for above-knee vein, and 64.8% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 3, 4, and 5 years (P .05). In meta-analysis CI, the pooled primary graft patency was 48.3% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 69.4% for above-knee vein, and 68.9% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts until 4 years (P < .05). The corresponding pooled secondary graft patency was 54.0%, 71.9%, and 77.8%, respectively, with a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 2, 3, and 4 years (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The great saphenous vein performs better than polytetrafluoroethylene in femoropopliteal bypass grafting and should be used whenever possible.

  • meta analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity Arterial Insufficiency
    Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
    Co-Authors: Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Maximiano Tadeu Villa Albers, Francisco Cardoso Brochadoneto, Marcello Romiti, Carlos Alberto Braganaa Pereira
    Abstract:

    Background In femoropopliteal bypass surgery, the use of saphenous vein grafts is preferable, but synthetic grafts are widely used above the knee. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the long-term patency of femoropopliteal bypass grafts classified as above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, above-knee saphenous vein, or below-knee saphenous vein. Methods Studies published from 1986 through 2004 were identified from electronic databases and reference lists; 73 articles contributed 1 or more series that used survival analysis, assessed femoropopliteal bypasses in one of the foregoing configurations, reported a 1-year graft patency rate, and included at least 30 bypasses. The series with a predominance of claudicant patients were included in meta-analysis C, and the series in which critical ischemia predominated were included in meta-analysis CI. Pooled survival curves of graft patency were constructed. Results In meta-analysis C, the pooled primary graft patency was 57.4% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 77.2% for above-knee vein, and 64.8% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts at 3, 4, and 5 years (P .05). In meta-analysis CI, the pooled primary graft patency was 48.3% for above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene, 69.4% for above-knee vein, and 68.9% for below-knee vein at 5 years; there was a significant difference between above-knee grafts until 4 years (P Conclusions The great saphenous vein performs better than polytetrafluoroethylene in femoropopliteal bypass grafting and should be used whenever possible.