The Experts below are selected from a list of 315792 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
M. Piwowarski - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Web Projects Evaluation Using the Method of Significant Website Assessment Criteria Detection
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2016Co-Authors: P. Ziemba, Jarosław Jankowski, Jarosław Wątróbski, M. PiwowarskiAbstract:The research presented in the article consists of an examination of the applicability of feature selection methods in the task of selecting website Assessment Criteria, to which weights are assigned. The applicability of the chosen methods was examined against the approach in which the weightings of website Assessment Criteria are defined by users. The research shows a selection procedure concerning significant choice Criteria and reveals undisclosed user preferences based on the website quality Assessment models. Results concerning undisclosed preferences were verified through a comparison with those declared by website users.
-
Procedure of Reducing Website Assessment Criteria and User Preference Analyses
Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 2011Co-Authors: P. Ziemba, M. PiwowarskiAbstract:Pawel Ziemba*, Mateusz Piwowarski* Abstract. The article outlines the issues of website quality Assessment, reduction of website Assessment Criteria and factors that users employ in the Assessment of websites. The article presents a selection procedure concerning significant choice Criteria and revealing undisclosed user preferences based on news portals and the eQual Assessment model. The formulated procedure utilizes statistical metrics, multiple Criteria decision making, rough sets and data mining tools. Results concerning undisclosed preferences were verified through a comparison to those declared by website users. The obtained results were further verified through a comparison of website Assessments obtained via a full and reduced set of website Assessment Criteria. Keywords: Website Quality Assessment, eQual, Reduction of Website Assessment Criteria, Web Intelligence and Interaction.
P. Ziemba - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Web Projects Evaluation Using the Method of Significant Website Assessment Criteria Detection
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2016Co-Authors: P. Ziemba, Jarosław Jankowski, Jarosław Wątróbski, M. PiwowarskiAbstract:The research presented in the article consists of an examination of the applicability of feature selection methods in the task of selecting website Assessment Criteria, to which weights are assigned. The applicability of the chosen methods was examined against the approach in which the weightings of website Assessment Criteria are defined by users. The research shows a selection procedure concerning significant choice Criteria and reveals undisclosed user preferences based on the website quality Assessment models. Results concerning undisclosed preferences were verified through a comparison with those declared by website users.
-
Procedure of Reducing Website Assessment Criteria and User Preference Analyses
Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 2011Co-Authors: P. Ziemba, M. PiwowarskiAbstract:Pawel Ziemba*, Mateusz Piwowarski* Abstract. The article outlines the issues of website quality Assessment, reduction of website Assessment Criteria and factors that users employ in the Assessment of websites. The article presents a selection procedure concerning significant choice Criteria and revealing undisclosed user preferences based on news portals and the eQual Assessment model. The formulated procedure utilizes statistical metrics, multiple Criteria decision making, rough sets and data mining tools. Results concerning undisclosed preferences were verified through a comparison to those declared by website users. The obtained results were further verified through a comparison of website Assessments obtained via a full and reduced set of website Assessment Criteria. Keywords: Website Quality Assessment, eQual, Reduction of Website Assessment Criteria, Web Intelligence and Interaction.
Shuhei Nishiguchi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
japan society of hepatology guidelines for sarcopenia in liver disease 1st edition recommendation from the working group for creation of sarcopenia Assessment Criteria
Hepatology Research, 2016Co-Authors: Hiroki Nishikawa, Makoto Shiraki, Akira Hiramatsu, Kyoji Moriya, Keisuke Hino, Shuhei NishiguchiAbstract:Sarcopenia is defined by muscle loss and muscle dysfunction. Sarcopenia is classified into primary and secondary types, based on the cause. Primary sarcopenia is mainly aging-related sarcopenia, whereas secondary sarcopenia is the reduced muscle mass and strength that accompanies an underlying disease. Given the essential role of the liver in metabolism, secondary sarcopenia due to nutritional disorders or other factors can frequently occur in liver disease. In 2015, the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) decided to establish its own Assessment Criteria for sarcopenia in liver disease because the number of liver disease patients with sarcopenia is expected to increase and there is cumulative evidence to indicate sarcopenic patients have poor clinical outcomes. A working group to create Assessment Criteria for sarcopenia has thus been established by the JSH. In this article, we summarize the current knowledge with regard to sarcopenia and present the Assessment Criteria for sarcopenia in liver disease proposed by the JSH (1st edition). To the best of our knowledge, this is globally the first proposed Assessment Criteria for sarcopenia specializing in liver disease.
Hiroki Nishikawa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
japan society of hepatology guidelines for sarcopenia in liver disease 1st edition recommendation from the working group for creation of sarcopenia Assessment Criteria
Hepatology Research, 2016Co-Authors: Hiroki Nishikawa, Makoto Shiraki, Akira Hiramatsu, Kyoji Moriya, Keisuke Hino, Shuhei NishiguchiAbstract:Sarcopenia is defined by muscle loss and muscle dysfunction. Sarcopenia is classified into primary and secondary types, based on the cause. Primary sarcopenia is mainly aging-related sarcopenia, whereas secondary sarcopenia is the reduced muscle mass and strength that accompanies an underlying disease. Given the essential role of the liver in metabolism, secondary sarcopenia due to nutritional disorders or other factors can frequently occur in liver disease. In 2015, the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) decided to establish its own Assessment Criteria for sarcopenia in liver disease because the number of liver disease patients with sarcopenia is expected to increase and there is cumulative evidence to indicate sarcopenic patients have poor clinical outcomes. A working group to create Assessment Criteria for sarcopenia has thus been established by the JSH. In this article, we summarize the current knowledge with regard to sarcopenia and present the Assessment Criteria for sarcopenia in liver disease proposed by the JSH (1st edition). To the best of our knowledge, this is globally the first proposed Assessment Criteria for sarcopenia specializing in liver disease.
John Goodson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
SAFECOMP - SQUALE Dependability Assessment Criteria
Computer Safety Reliability and Security, 1999Co-Authors: Yves Deswarte, Mohamed Kaâniche, Pierre Corneillie, John GoodsonAbstract:The aim of the SQUALE project is to develop Assessment Criteria to obtain a justified confidence that a system will achieve, during its operational life and its disposal, the dependability objectives assigned to it. The SQUALE Criteria differ from traditional evaluation methods (security evaluation Criteria, standards for the design, development and validation of safety critical systems), by: 1) their independence with respect to the application domains and industrial sectors, 2) their ability to address all dependability attributes, and 3) their progressiveness as a function of more or less strict requirements.
-
SQUALE Dependability Assessment Criteria
1999Co-Authors: Yves Deswarte, Mohamed Kaâniche, Pierre Corneillie, John GoodsonAbstract:The aim of the SQUALE project is to develop Assessment Criteria to obtain a justified confidence that a system will achieve, during its operational life and its disposal, the dependability objectives assigned to it. The SQUALE Criteria differ from traditional evaluation methods (security evaluation Criteria, standards for the design, development and validation of safety critical systems), by: 1) their independence with respect to the application domains and industrial sectors, 2) their ability to address all dependability attributes, and 3) their progressiveness as a function of more or less strict requirements.
