The Experts below are selected from a list of 24 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Masumi Inagaki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy: clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia.
    Brain & development, 2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be "pure type" of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay.

  • case report Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia
    2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be ‘pure type’ of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay. q 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Makiko Kaga - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy: clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia.
    Brain & development, 2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be "pure type" of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay.

  • case report Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia
    2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be ‘pure type’ of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay. q 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Kaori Kon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy: clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia.
    Brain & development, 2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be "pure type" of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay.

  • case report Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia
    2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be ‘pure type’ of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay. q 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Akira Uno - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy: clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia.
    Brain & development, 2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be "pure type" of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay.

  • case report Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia
    2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be ‘pure type’ of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay. q 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Toshihiro Horiguchi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy: clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia.
    Brain & development, 2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be "pure type" of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay.

  • case report Auditory perception in Auditory neuropathy clinical similarity with Auditory Verbal Agnosia
    2002
    Co-Authors: Makiko Kaga, Kaori Kon, Akira Uno, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hitoshi Yoneyama, Masumi Inagaki
    Abstract:

    The precise features of Auditory perception in patients with Auditory neuropathy have not been well described. In the present study, we examined Auditory perception in a patient with Auditory neuropathy. The patient was a right-handed 7-year-old boy. His chief complaint was delayed speech and suspected of Verbal learning disability. He could talk, read and repeat rather fluently but could not understand fully what was asked. V-IQ, P-IQ and F-IQ of Wechsler Scale for Children III-R were 53, 118 and 81, respectively. Pure tone audiogram was completely normal. His speech discrimination ability was very poor. He could identify environmental sounds with visual matching. He could differentiate intensity difference but not time difference. This phenomenon was reported in patients with hemispheric symptoms. These clinical features are very similar to Verbal Auditory Agnosia. ABR showed no response at 90dBnHL alternating clicks and tone bursts. Click evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were normal. Electrocochleogram was also normal. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was completely normal. Pa of MLR and N1 of SVR were present. His diagnosis should be ‘pure type’ of Auditory neuropathy or Auditory nerve disease. Importance of both ABR and OAE examination should be widely announced and Auditory neuropathy must be campaigned stressed to be clinical entity among personnel who take care of children with speech delay. q 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.