The Experts below are selected from a list of 24 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Josemir W Sander - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy vs conservative treatment for spontaneous intracerebral Hemorrhage results from a randomized clinical trial in china
International Journal of Stroke, 2009Co-Authors: Wenzhi Wang, Bin Jiang, Di Li, Chuanzhen Lu, Yadu Zhao, Josemir W SanderAbstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: To evaluate the effects of minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy compared with conservative treatment in treating intracerebral Hemorrhage (25-40 ml) in the Basal Ganglion. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized control clinical trial comprised 465 cases of Hemorrhage in the Basal Ganglion from 42 hospitals in China. Three hundred and seventy-seven patients with Hemorrhage were randomly assigned to receive minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy (n=195) or conservative control treatment (n=182). The main indices of evaluation were the degree of neurological impairment at the 14th day after treatment, activities of daily living at the end of the 3rd month and the case fatality within 3 months. RESULTS: Improvement of neurological function in the minimally invasive craniopuncture group was significantly better than that in the control group at the 14th day (chi(2)=7.93, P=0.02). At the end of the 3rd month, there was a significant difference between the two groups in activities of daily living score (chi(2)=23.13, P 2) in the craniopuncture group (40.9%) was significantly lower than that in the conservative group (63.0%) at the end of the 3rd month (chi(2)=16.95, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the cumulative fatality rates within three months between the two groups [6.7% (13/195) in the craniopuncture group and 8.8% (16/182) in the conservative group]. CONCLUSIONS: This minimally invasive craniopuncture technique can improve the independent survival of patients with small Basal Ganglion Hemorrhage. It is a safe and practical technique in treating cerebral Hemorrhage.
Wenzhi Wang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy vs conservative treatment for spontaneous intracerebral Hemorrhage results from a randomized clinical trial in china
International Journal of Stroke, 2009Co-Authors: Wenzhi Wang, Bin Jiang, Di Li, Chuanzhen Lu, Yadu Zhao, Josemir W SanderAbstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: To evaluate the effects of minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy compared with conservative treatment in treating intracerebral Hemorrhage (25-40 ml) in the Basal Ganglion. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized control clinical trial comprised 465 cases of Hemorrhage in the Basal Ganglion from 42 hospitals in China. Three hundred and seventy-seven patients with Hemorrhage were randomly assigned to receive minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy (n=195) or conservative control treatment (n=182). The main indices of evaluation were the degree of neurological impairment at the 14th day after treatment, activities of daily living at the end of the 3rd month and the case fatality within 3 months. RESULTS: Improvement of neurological function in the minimally invasive craniopuncture group was significantly better than that in the control group at the 14th day (chi(2)=7.93, P=0.02). At the end of the 3rd month, there was a significant difference between the two groups in activities of daily living score (chi(2)=23.13, P 2) in the craniopuncture group (40.9%) was significantly lower than that in the conservative group (63.0%) at the end of the 3rd month (chi(2)=16.95, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the cumulative fatality rates within three months between the two groups [6.7% (13/195) in the craniopuncture group and 8.8% (16/182) in the conservative group]. CONCLUSIONS: This minimally invasive craniopuncture technique can improve the independent survival of patients with small Basal Ganglion Hemorrhage. It is a safe and practical technique in treating cerebral Hemorrhage.
Shiqiang Wang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
application of water jet dissection technique in surgical treatment of hypertensive Basal Ganglion Hemorrhage through transsylvian transinular or temporal lobe approach
Global Journal of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2013Co-Authors: Tongjun Song, Jiangong Wei, Shiqiang WangAbstract:目的 探讨水分离技术在高血压基底节区脑出血手术治疗中的应用及体会。方法 回顾性分析2011年1月至2012年12月收治的62例高血压基底节区脑出血,其中43例采用常规手术清除血肿，19例术中应用水分离技术解剖侧裂和清除血肿。对比两组手术时间及术后血肿清除范围。结果 常规方式组手术时间在（3±0.30）h；水分离技术组(2.5±0.30)h。常规组20例血肿完全清除，16例血肿清除大于90%，7例小于90%；水分离技术组17例血肿完全清除，2例血肿清除大于90%(c 2 =10.40， P ＜0.05)。结论 水分离技术是一种安全简便的微创技术，在经侧裂岛叶入路清除血肿中能很好的帮助解剖侧裂,在经颞叶清除血肿时,也能很容易将血肿整块清除,且对周围脑组织损伤小，血肿清除彻底。
Yadu Zhao - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy vs conservative treatment for spontaneous intracerebral Hemorrhage results from a randomized clinical trial in china
International Journal of Stroke, 2009Co-Authors: Wenzhi Wang, Bin Jiang, Di Li, Chuanzhen Lu, Yadu Zhao, Josemir W SanderAbstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: To evaluate the effects of minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy compared with conservative treatment in treating intracerebral Hemorrhage (25-40 ml) in the Basal Ganglion. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized control clinical trial comprised 465 cases of Hemorrhage in the Basal Ganglion from 42 hospitals in China. Three hundred and seventy-seven patients with Hemorrhage were randomly assigned to receive minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy (n=195) or conservative control treatment (n=182). The main indices of evaluation were the degree of neurological impairment at the 14th day after treatment, activities of daily living at the end of the 3rd month and the case fatality within 3 months. RESULTS: Improvement of neurological function in the minimally invasive craniopuncture group was significantly better than that in the control group at the 14th day (chi(2)=7.93, P=0.02). At the end of the 3rd month, there was a significant difference between the two groups in activities of daily living score (chi(2)=23.13, P 2) in the craniopuncture group (40.9%) was significantly lower than that in the conservative group (63.0%) at the end of the 3rd month (chi(2)=16.95, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the cumulative fatality rates within three months between the two groups [6.7% (13/195) in the craniopuncture group and 8.8% (16/182) in the conservative group]. CONCLUSIONS: This minimally invasive craniopuncture technique can improve the independent survival of patients with small Basal Ganglion Hemorrhage. It is a safe and practical technique in treating cerebral Hemorrhage.
Chuanzhen Lu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy vs conservative treatment for spontaneous intracerebral Hemorrhage results from a randomized clinical trial in china
International Journal of Stroke, 2009Co-Authors: Wenzhi Wang, Bin Jiang, Di Li, Chuanzhen Lu, Yadu Zhao, Josemir W SanderAbstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: To evaluate the effects of minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy compared with conservative treatment in treating intracerebral Hemorrhage (25-40 ml) in the Basal Ganglion. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized control clinical trial comprised 465 cases of Hemorrhage in the Basal Ganglion from 42 hospitals in China. Three hundred and seventy-seven patients with Hemorrhage were randomly assigned to receive minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy (n=195) or conservative control treatment (n=182). The main indices of evaluation were the degree of neurological impairment at the 14th day after treatment, activities of daily living at the end of the 3rd month and the case fatality within 3 months. RESULTS: Improvement of neurological function in the minimally invasive craniopuncture group was significantly better than that in the control group at the 14th day (chi(2)=7.93, P=0.02). At the end of the 3rd month, there was a significant difference between the two groups in activities of daily living score (chi(2)=23.13, P 2) in the craniopuncture group (40.9%) was significantly lower than that in the conservative group (63.0%) at the end of the 3rd month (chi(2)=16.95, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the cumulative fatality rates within three months between the two groups [6.7% (13/195) in the craniopuncture group and 8.8% (16/182) in the conservative group]. CONCLUSIONS: This minimally invasive craniopuncture technique can improve the independent survival of patients with small Basal Ganglion Hemorrhage. It is a safe and practical technique in treating cerebral Hemorrhage.
