Blunt Dissection

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 282 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

F W Schildberg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a comparison of different techniques for liver resection Blunt Dissection ultrasonic aspirator and jet cutter
    Ejso, 1995
    Co-Authors: H. M. Schardey, E Buttler, T. U. Cohnert, Christoph Reuter, F W Schildberg
    Abstract:

    In a prospective study 116 patients underwent liver resection. Three different resection techniques, Blunt Dissection ( n = 61), ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA) ( n = 27) and jet-cutter ( n = 28) were compared. Speed of resection, blood loss, transfusion rate, liver hilus clamping time and tissue damage were evaluated on the basis of area of transected liver surface. Liver resection with the jet-cutter was significantly faster with a resection time of 0.33 mm/cm 2 in comparison to Blunt Dissection (0.57 min/cm 2 ) and CUSA (0.50 min/cm 2 ) ( P 2 ( P 2 , CUSA 24.3 ml/cm 2 ). Tissue damage with respect to transaminases SGOT and SGPT was comparable to the other techniques. The jet-cutter is a promising new instrument in liver surgery.

  • A comparison of different techniques for liver resection: Blunt Dissection, ultrasonic aspirator and jet-cutter
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1995
    Co-Authors: H G Rau, E Buttler, H. M. Schardey, T. U. Cohnert, Christoph Reuter, F W Schildberg
    Abstract:

    In a prospective study 116 patients underwent liver resection. Three different resection techniques, Blunt Dissection (n = 61), ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA) (n = 27) and jet-cutter (n = 28) were compared. Speed of resection, blood loss, transfusion rate, liver hilus clamping time and tissue damage were evaluated on the basis of area of transected liver surface. Liver resection with the jet-cutter was significantly faster with a resection time of 0.33 mm/cm2 in comparison to Blunt Dissection (0.57 min/cm2) and CUSA (0.50 min/cm2) (P < 0.01) and associated with lower blood loss of 17.7 ml/cm2 (P < 0.01) than the other techniques (Blunt Dissection 32.5 ml/cm2, CUSA 24.3 ml/cm2). Tissue damage with respect to transaminases SGOT and SGPT was comparable to the other techniques. The jet-cutter is a promising new instrument in liver surgery. © 1995 W.B. Saunders Company Limited.

Heikki Löppönen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

H. M. Schardey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a comparison of different techniques for liver resection Blunt Dissection ultrasonic aspirator and jet cutter
    Ejso, 1995
    Co-Authors: H. M. Schardey, E Buttler, T. U. Cohnert, Christoph Reuter, F W Schildberg
    Abstract:

    In a prospective study 116 patients underwent liver resection. Three different resection techniques, Blunt Dissection ( n = 61), ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA) ( n = 27) and jet-cutter ( n = 28) were compared. Speed of resection, blood loss, transfusion rate, liver hilus clamping time and tissue damage were evaluated on the basis of area of transected liver surface. Liver resection with the jet-cutter was significantly faster with a resection time of 0.33 mm/cm 2 in comparison to Blunt Dissection (0.57 min/cm 2 ) and CUSA (0.50 min/cm 2 ) ( P 2 ( P 2 , CUSA 24.3 ml/cm 2 ). Tissue damage with respect to transaminases SGOT and SGPT was comparable to the other techniques. The jet-cutter is a promising new instrument in liver surgery.

  • A comparison of different techniques for liver resection: Blunt Dissection, ultrasonic aspirator and jet-cutter
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1995
    Co-Authors: H G Rau, E Buttler, H. M. Schardey, T. U. Cohnert, Christoph Reuter, F W Schildberg
    Abstract:

    In a prospective study 116 patients underwent liver resection. Three different resection techniques, Blunt Dissection (n = 61), ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA) (n = 27) and jet-cutter (n = 28) were compared. Speed of resection, blood loss, transfusion rate, liver hilus clamping time and tissue damage were evaluated on the basis of area of transected liver surface. Liver resection with the jet-cutter was significantly faster with a resection time of 0.33 mm/cm2 in comparison to Blunt Dissection (0.57 min/cm2) and CUSA (0.50 min/cm2) (P < 0.01) and associated with lower blood loss of 17.7 ml/cm2 (P < 0.01) than the other techniques (Blunt Dissection 32.5 ml/cm2, CUSA 24.3 ml/cm2). Tissue damage with respect to transaminases SGOT and SGPT was comparable to the other techniques. The jet-cutter is a promising new instrument in liver surgery. © 1995 W.B. Saunders Company Limited.

E Buttler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a comparison of different techniques for liver resection Blunt Dissection ultrasonic aspirator and jet cutter
    Ejso, 1995
    Co-Authors: H. M. Schardey, E Buttler, T. U. Cohnert, Christoph Reuter, F W Schildberg
    Abstract:

    In a prospective study 116 patients underwent liver resection. Three different resection techniques, Blunt Dissection ( n = 61), ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA) ( n = 27) and jet-cutter ( n = 28) were compared. Speed of resection, blood loss, transfusion rate, liver hilus clamping time and tissue damage were evaluated on the basis of area of transected liver surface. Liver resection with the jet-cutter was significantly faster with a resection time of 0.33 mm/cm 2 in comparison to Blunt Dissection (0.57 min/cm 2 ) and CUSA (0.50 min/cm 2 ) ( P 2 ( P 2 , CUSA 24.3 ml/cm 2 ). Tissue damage with respect to transaminases SGOT and SGPT was comparable to the other techniques. The jet-cutter is a promising new instrument in liver surgery.

  • A comparison of different techniques for liver resection: Blunt Dissection, ultrasonic aspirator and jet-cutter
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1995
    Co-Authors: H G Rau, E Buttler, H. M. Schardey, T. U. Cohnert, Christoph Reuter, F W Schildberg
    Abstract:

    In a prospective study 116 patients underwent liver resection. Three different resection techniques, Blunt Dissection (n = 61), ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA) (n = 27) and jet-cutter (n = 28) were compared. Speed of resection, blood loss, transfusion rate, liver hilus clamping time and tissue damage were evaluated on the basis of area of transected liver surface. Liver resection with the jet-cutter was significantly faster with a resection time of 0.33 mm/cm2 in comparison to Blunt Dissection (0.57 min/cm2) and CUSA (0.50 min/cm2) (P < 0.01) and associated with lower blood loss of 17.7 ml/cm2 (P < 0.01) than the other techniques (Blunt Dissection 32.5 ml/cm2, CUSA 24.3 ml/cm2). Tissue damage with respect to transaminases SGOT and SGPT was comparable to the other techniques. The jet-cutter is a promising new instrument in liver surgery. © 1995 W.B. Saunders Company Limited.

T. U. Cohnert - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a comparison of different techniques for liver resection Blunt Dissection ultrasonic aspirator and jet cutter
    Ejso, 1995
    Co-Authors: H. M. Schardey, E Buttler, T. U. Cohnert, Christoph Reuter, F W Schildberg
    Abstract:

    In a prospective study 116 patients underwent liver resection. Three different resection techniques, Blunt Dissection ( n = 61), ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA) ( n = 27) and jet-cutter ( n = 28) were compared. Speed of resection, blood loss, transfusion rate, liver hilus clamping time and tissue damage were evaluated on the basis of area of transected liver surface. Liver resection with the jet-cutter was significantly faster with a resection time of 0.33 mm/cm 2 in comparison to Blunt Dissection (0.57 min/cm 2 ) and CUSA (0.50 min/cm 2 ) ( P 2 ( P 2 , CUSA 24.3 ml/cm 2 ). Tissue damage with respect to transaminases SGOT and SGPT was comparable to the other techniques. The jet-cutter is a promising new instrument in liver surgery.

  • A comparison of different techniques for liver resection: Blunt Dissection, ultrasonic aspirator and jet-cutter
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1995
    Co-Authors: H G Rau, E Buttler, H. M. Schardey, T. U. Cohnert, Christoph Reuter, F W Schildberg
    Abstract:

    In a prospective study 116 patients underwent liver resection. Three different resection techniques, Blunt Dissection (n = 61), ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA) (n = 27) and jet-cutter (n = 28) were compared. Speed of resection, blood loss, transfusion rate, liver hilus clamping time and tissue damage were evaluated on the basis of area of transected liver surface. Liver resection with the jet-cutter was significantly faster with a resection time of 0.33 mm/cm2 in comparison to Blunt Dissection (0.57 min/cm2) and CUSA (0.50 min/cm2) (P < 0.01) and associated with lower blood loss of 17.7 ml/cm2 (P < 0.01) than the other techniques (Blunt Dissection 32.5 ml/cm2, CUSA 24.3 ml/cm2). Tissue damage with respect to transaminases SGOT and SGPT was comparable to the other techniques. The jet-cutter is a promising new instrument in liver surgery. © 1995 W.B. Saunders Company Limited.