The Experts below are selected from a list of 15 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Malcolm Macleod - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Alpha and sqrt of Planck momentum Planck unit theory: Fine structure Constant alpha and sqrt of Planck momentum
    2014
    Co-Authors: Malcolm Macleod
    Abstract:

    A major problem in constructing a Planck unit theory is that the Planck units are limited to the precision of G and so to 4-digits. By postulating the sqrt of Planck momentum Q as the link between mass and charge, a ’Planck ’ ampere AQ is constructed as a geometrical shape; the volume of velocity/mass. From this Planck Ampere can then be derived µ0 (permeability of vacuum) which in turn gives a formula for Planck length lp and for a magnetic monopole (A.lp). From the monopole can be formed an electron which is then used to solve the Rydberg Constant R. Consequently G, h, e, me... can then be solved in terms of the 4 most accurate Constants c, µ0, Rydberg Constant (12 digit precision) and the fine structure Constant alpha α (10 digit precision). Planck temperature TP and so Boltzmanns Constant kB are functions of the ampere and velocity (A.c). The electron formula suggests a Planck unit theory whereby particles are dimensionless formulas dictating the frequency of Planck events via a periodic (analog) electric wave-state to digital (integer) Planck-time-mass point-state oscillation. This wave-particle duality (oscillation) suggests a MUH Mathematical Universe Hypothesis where particles and photons modulate magnetic monopoles. The dimensions of our universe then reduce to the 3 dimensions of motion; Planck momentum, Planck time and velocity c.

  • Alpha and sqrt of Planck momentum Planck unit theory: Fine structure Constant alpha and sqrt of Planck momentum
    2014
    Co-Authors: Malcolm Macleod
    Abstract:

    A major problem in constructing a Planck unit theory is that the Planck units are limited to the precision of G and so to 4-digits. By postulating the sqrt of Planck momentum Q as the link between mass and charge, a ’Planck ’ ampere AQ is constructed as a geometrical shape; the volume of velocity/mass. From this Planck Ampere can then be derived µ0 (permeability of vacuum) which in turn gives a formula for Planck length lp and for a magnetic monopole (A.lp). From the monopole can be formed an electron which is then used to solve the Rydberg Constant R. Consequently G, h, e, me... can then be solved in terms of the 4 most accurate Constants c, µ0, Rydberg Constant (12 digit precision) and the fine structure Constant alpha α (10 digit precision). Planck temperature TP and so Boltzmanns Constant kB are functions of the ampere and velocity A.c. The electron formula suggests a Planck unit theory whereby particles are dimensionless formulas dictating the frequency of Planck events via a periodic (analog) electric wave-state to digital (integer) Planck-time-mass point-state oscillation. This wave-particle duality (oscillation) suggests a MUH Mathematical Universe Hypothesis where particles and photons modulate magnetic monopoles. The dimensions of our universe then reduce to the 3 dimensions of motion; sqrt of Planck momentum, Planck time and c.

Basuthkar J. Rao - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Sandeep Chakraborty - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Arturo Casadevall - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Differences in free activation energy of binding (ΔΔG‡) of the transition states of chAb 18B7 and 18B7dg for the binding to peptide P1.
    2013
    Co-Authors: Marcela Torres, Narcis Fernandez-fuentes, András Fiser, Arturo Casadevall
    Abstract:

    Each panel corresponds to the ΔG of chAb 18B7-P1 and 18B7dg-P1 complex formation, relative to the ΔG of parental mAb 18B7. A, free activation energy of binding (ΔΔG‡), B, encounter activation free energies (ΔΔG1‡) and C, docking activation free energies (ΔΔG2‡), as a function of temperature. Values of ΔΔG were calculated as ΔGch/dgAb−ΔGmAb18B7. In all cases, the activation energies for the encounter and docking steps (ΔG1‡ and ΔG2‡) were calculated from k+1 and k+2, respectively, according to the transition state theory: ΔG‡ = −RT ln K‡, ΔΔG‡ = −RT ln K‡ch/dg Ab/K‡mAb18B7, and K‡ = kB T ka/ћ, where ka is the forward rate Constant, kB is Boltzmanns Constant and ћ is Plank's Constant.

Marcela Torres - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Differences in free activation energy of binding (ΔΔG‡) of the transition states of chAb 18B7 and 18B7dg for the binding to peptide P1.
    2013
    Co-Authors: Marcela Torres, Narcis Fernandez-fuentes, András Fiser, Arturo Casadevall
    Abstract:

    Each panel corresponds to the ΔG of chAb 18B7-P1 and 18B7dg-P1 complex formation, relative to the ΔG of parental mAb 18B7. A, free activation energy of binding (ΔΔG‡), B, encounter activation free energies (ΔΔG1‡) and C, docking activation free energies (ΔΔG2‡), as a function of temperature. Values of ΔΔG were calculated as ΔGch/dgAb−ΔGmAb18B7. In all cases, the activation energies for the encounter and docking steps (ΔG1‡ and ΔG2‡) were calculated from k+1 and k+2, respectively, according to the transition state theory: ΔG‡ = −RT ln K‡, ΔΔG‡ = −RT ln K‡ch/dg Ab/K‡mAb18B7, and K‡ = kB T ka/ћ, where ka is the forward rate Constant, kB is Boltzmanns Constant and ћ is Plank's Constant.