The Experts below are selected from a list of 3237 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Danielle R Jahn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a brief spanish english equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test a project frontier study
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Danielle R Jahn, Cortney Mauer, Chloe V Menon, Melissa Edwards, Jeffrey A Dressel, Sidney Obryant
    Abstract:

    The Boston Naming Test is a neuropsychological measure of confrontation Naming, short forms of which can be advantageous with various populations. The purpose of this study was to establish a Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT using item response theory. Data were analyzed from 380 Project FRONTIER participants; 27 items differed between groups and were removed from the measure. Additionally, 18 items did not differ between groups but were poor items. The current 15-item Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT offers significant advantages. Future work is required to validate the diagnostic utility of the instrument in various settings and populations.

  • A brief Spanish–English equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test: A Project FRONTIER Study
    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Danielle R Jahn, Cortney Mauer, Chloe V Menon, Melissa Edwards, Jeffrey A Dressel, Sidney O'bryant
    Abstract:

    The Boston Naming Test is a neuropsychological measure of confrontation Naming, short forms of which can be advantageous with various populations. The purpose of this study was to establish a Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT using item response theory. Data were analyzed from 380 Project FRONTIER participants; 27 items differed between groups and were removed from the measure. Additionally, 18 items did not differ between groups but were poor items. The current 15-item Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT offers significant advantages. Future work is required to validate the diagnostic utility of the instrument in various settings and populations.

Sidney Obryant - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a brief spanish english equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test a project frontier study
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Danielle R Jahn, Cortney Mauer, Chloe V Menon, Melissa Edwards, Jeffrey A Dressel, Sidney Obryant
    Abstract:

    The Boston Naming Test is a neuropsychological measure of confrontation Naming, short forms of which can be advantageous with various populations. The purpose of this study was to establish a Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT using item response theory. Data were analyzed from 380 Project FRONTIER participants; 27 items differed between groups and were removed from the measure. Additionally, 18 items did not differ between groups but were poor items. The current 15-item Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT offers significant advantages. Future work is required to validate the diagnostic utility of the instrument in various settings and populations.

Sidney O'bryant - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • A brief Spanish–English equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test: A Project FRONTIER Study
    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Danielle R Jahn, Cortney Mauer, Chloe V Menon, Melissa Edwards, Jeffrey A Dressel, Sidney O'bryant
    Abstract:

    The Boston Naming Test is a neuropsychological measure of confrontation Naming, short forms of which can be advantageous with various populations. The purpose of this study was to establish a Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT using item response theory. Data were analyzed from 380 Project FRONTIER participants; 27 items differed between groups and were removed from the measure. Additionally, 18 items did not differ between groups but were poor items. The current 15-item Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT offers significant advantages. Future work is required to validate the diagnostic utility of the instrument in various settings and populations.

Melissa Edwards - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a brief spanish english equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test a project frontier study
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Danielle R Jahn, Cortney Mauer, Chloe V Menon, Melissa Edwards, Jeffrey A Dressel, Sidney Obryant
    Abstract:

    The Boston Naming Test is a neuropsychological measure of confrontation Naming, short forms of which can be advantageous with various populations. The purpose of this study was to establish a Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT using item response theory. Data were analyzed from 380 Project FRONTIER participants; 27 items differed between groups and were removed from the measure. Additionally, 18 items did not differ between groups but were poor items. The current 15-item Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT offers significant advantages. Future work is required to validate the diagnostic utility of the instrument in various settings and populations.

  • A brief Spanish–English equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test: A Project FRONTIER Study
    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Danielle R Jahn, Cortney Mauer, Chloe V Menon, Melissa Edwards, Jeffrey A Dressel, Sidney O'bryant
    Abstract:

    The Boston Naming Test is a neuropsychological measure of confrontation Naming, short forms of which can be advantageous with various populations. The purpose of this study was to establish a Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT using item response theory. Data were analyzed from 380 Project FRONTIER participants; 27 items differed between groups and were removed from the measure. Additionally, 18 items did not differ between groups but were poor items. The current 15-item Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT offers significant advantages. Future work is required to validate the diagnostic utility of the instrument in various settings and populations.

Chloe V Menon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a brief spanish english equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test a project frontier study
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Danielle R Jahn, Cortney Mauer, Chloe V Menon, Melissa Edwards, Jeffrey A Dressel, Sidney Obryant
    Abstract:

    The Boston Naming Test is a neuropsychological measure of confrontation Naming, short forms of which can be advantageous with various populations. The purpose of this study was to establish a Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT using item response theory. Data were analyzed from 380 Project FRONTIER participants; 27 items differed between groups and were removed from the measure. Additionally, 18 items did not differ between groups but were poor items. The current 15-item Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT offers significant advantages. Future work is required to validate the diagnostic utility of the instrument in various settings and populations.

  • A brief Spanish–English equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test: A Project FRONTIER Study
    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Danielle R Jahn, Cortney Mauer, Chloe V Menon, Melissa Edwards, Jeffrey A Dressel, Sidney O'bryant
    Abstract:

    The Boston Naming Test is a neuropsychological measure of confrontation Naming, short forms of which can be advantageous with various populations. The purpose of this study was to establish a Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT using item response theory. Data were analyzed from 380 Project FRONTIER participants; 27 items differed between groups and were removed from the measure. Additionally, 18 items did not differ between groups but were poor items. The current 15-item Spanish–English equivalent version of the BNT offers significant advantages. Future work is required to validate the diagnostic utility of the instrument in various settings and populations.