The Experts below are selected from a list of 51 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Winancy Winancy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • perbandingan penerapan metode Brainstorming dan buzz Group terhadap peningkatan pengetahuan suami ibu hamil tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan persalinan dan nifas studi kasus di bogor
    SEAJOM: The Southeast Asia Journal of Midwifery, 2019
    Co-Authors: Winancy Winancy, Ardini S Raksanagara, Yoni Fuadah
    Abstract:

    Suami ibu hamil sebagai pengambil keputusan dalam keluarga penting diberi Pendidikan Kesehatan tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan, persalinan, dan nifas untuk meningkatkan perannya dalam mencegah situasi 3 terlambat yang menjadi penyebab tidak langsung kematian ibu di Indonesia. Metode Brainstorming dan buzz Group dalam Pendidikan Kesehatan dapat menstimulasi peran aktif peserta diskusi sehingga informasi yang diberi lebih mudah diterima. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian Quasi Experiment dengan rancangan Non Randomized Pretest-Posttest Design. Populasi penelitian adalah suami yang istrinya sedang hamil di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Sukamakmur Kabupaten Bogor di Desa Sirnajaya dan Desa Cibadak. Metode pengambilan sampel adalah secara accidental sampling yang terdiri dari dua kelompok, yaitu kelompok Brainstorming sebanyak 63 responden dan kelompok buzz Group sebanyak 61 responden. Analisis uji statistik menggunakan uji Wilcoxon dan Mann-Whitney. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengetahuan responden sebelum dan segera setelah proses Pendidikan Kesehatan mengalami peningkatan (p<0,001). Hasil uji Mann-Whitney menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan nilai median pengetahuan responden pada kelompok buzz Group adalah lebih baik dibandingkan Brainstorming. Metode Pendidikan Kesehatan Brainstorming dan buzz Group mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengetahuan responden tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan, persalinan, dan nifas. Kata kunci: Brainstorming; Buzz Group; Pengetahuan; Tanda bahaya kehamilan. ABSTRACT It is important to give the husbands of pregnant women, as decision makers in the family, health education about the danger signs in pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum. Methods of Brainstorming and buzz Group on health education are able to stimulate the active role of participants of a discussion, so they accept the information given to them more easily. This was a Quasi Experimental Study with Non Randomized Pretest-Posttest design. Population in this study consisted of the husbands whose wife was pregnant and lived in the work area of Sukamakmur Puskesmas (Community Health Center) in Bogor District. Accidental sampling method was used and it involved two Groups, namely Brainstorming Group consisting of 63 respondents and buzz Group consisting of 61 respondents. Statistical analysis used Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests. The results showed that the respondents knowledge was improved immediately after the health education had been given (p <0.001). The results of Mann-Whitney test described that the increased median value of knowledge of the respondents in buzz Group was better than that in Brainstorming Group. The conclusion shows that Buzz Group has better impacts on the increased median value of the respondents’ knowledge. Key Words: Brainstroming, Buzz Group; Knowledge; Danger sign of pregnancy.

  • sikap suami tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan persalinan dan nifas perbandingan metode Brainstorming dan buzz Group
    Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kesehatan, 2016
    Co-Authors: Winancy Winancy
    Abstract:

    The danger signs of pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum period is important for thehusbands of pregnant wife to improve participation on preventing maternal deathscaused by the three late situations. Brainstorming dan buzz Group are participatoryeducation methods which can motivate participants to be active in a discussion, shareexperience, and receive more information. The aim of this study is to know the effect ofBrainstorming and buzz Group methods to husbands attitude about danger signs ofpregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum periods. This is a quasi experiment study withpretest-posttest non randomized design. The Population in this study was husbans ofpregnant wife in Puskesmas Sukamakmur Subdistrict of Bogor District especiallySirnajaya and Cibadak village. Sampling was conducted using accidental sampling anddevided into two Groups, the Brainstorming Group with 63 respondent and buzz Groupwith 61 respondents. The results showed that the respondents attitude was alsoimproved significantly with p <0.005 in Brainstorming Group and p<0.001 in buzzGroup. The results of Mann-Whitney test described that the increased median valueattitude of the respondents in buzz Group was better than Brainstorming Group. Fromthis study it can be concluded that health education with Brainstorming methods andbuzz Groups have significant effect on attitudes husband of pregnant women aboutdanger signs of pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum. Effect of buzz Group method wasbetter to improve the median value of knowledge and attitudes than Brainstormingmethods.

Yoni Fuadah - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • perbandingan penerapan metode Brainstorming dan buzz Group terhadap peningkatan pengetahuan suami ibu hamil tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan persalinan dan nifas studi kasus di bogor
    SEAJOM: The Southeast Asia Journal of Midwifery, 2019
    Co-Authors: Winancy Winancy, Ardini S Raksanagara, Yoni Fuadah
    Abstract:

    Suami ibu hamil sebagai pengambil keputusan dalam keluarga penting diberi Pendidikan Kesehatan tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan, persalinan, dan nifas untuk meningkatkan perannya dalam mencegah situasi 3 terlambat yang menjadi penyebab tidak langsung kematian ibu di Indonesia. Metode Brainstorming dan buzz Group dalam Pendidikan Kesehatan dapat menstimulasi peran aktif peserta diskusi sehingga informasi yang diberi lebih mudah diterima. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian Quasi Experiment dengan rancangan Non Randomized Pretest-Posttest Design. Populasi penelitian adalah suami yang istrinya sedang hamil di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Sukamakmur Kabupaten Bogor di Desa Sirnajaya dan Desa Cibadak. Metode pengambilan sampel adalah secara accidental sampling yang terdiri dari dua kelompok, yaitu kelompok Brainstorming sebanyak 63 responden dan kelompok buzz Group sebanyak 61 responden. Analisis uji statistik menggunakan uji Wilcoxon dan Mann-Whitney. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengetahuan responden sebelum dan segera setelah proses Pendidikan Kesehatan mengalami peningkatan (p<0,001). Hasil uji Mann-Whitney menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan nilai median pengetahuan responden pada kelompok buzz Group adalah lebih baik dibandingkan Brainstorming. Metode Pendidikan Kesehatan Brainstorming dan buzz Group mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengetahuan responden tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan, persalinan, dan nifas. Kata kunci: Brainstorming; Buzz Group; Pengetahuan; Tanda bahaya kehamilan. ABSTRACT It is important to give the husbands of pregnant women, as decision makers in the family, health education about the danger signs in pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum. Methods of Brainstorming and buzz Group on health education are able to stimulate the active role of participants of a discussion, so they accept the information given to them more easily. This was a Quasi Experimental Study with Non Randomized Pretest-Posttest design. Population in this study consisted of the husbands whose wife was pregnant and lived in the work area of Sukamakmur Puskesmas (Community Health Center) in Bogor District. Accidental sampling method was used and it involved two Groups, namely Brainstorming Group consisting of 63 respondents and buzz Group consisting of 61 respondents. Statistical analysis used Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests. The results showed that the respondents knowledge was improved immediately after the health education had been given (p <0.001). The results of Mann-Whitney test described that the increased median value of knowledge of the respondents in buzz Group was better than that in Brainstorming Group. The conclusion shows that Buzz Group has better impacts on the increased median value of the respondents’ knowledge. Key Words: Brainstroming, Buzz Group; Knowledge; Danger sign of pregnancy.

Ardini S Raksanagara - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • perbandingan penerapan metode Brainstorming dan buzz Group terhadap peningkatan pengetahuan suami ibu hamil tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan persalinan dan nifas studi kasus di bogor
    SEAJOM: The Southeast Asia Journal of Midwifery, 2019
    Co-Authors: Winancy Winancy, Ardini S Raksanagara, Yoni Fuadah
    Abstract:

    Suami ibu hamil sebagai pengambil keputusan dalam keluarga penting diberi Pendidikan Kesehatan tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan, persalinan, dan nifas untuk meningkatkan perannya dalam mencegah situasi 3 terlambat yang menjadi penyebab tidak langsung kematian ibu di Indonesia. Metode Brainstorming dan buzz Group dalam Pendidikan Kesehatan dapat menstimulasi peran aktif peserta diskusi sehingga informasi yang diberi lebih mudah diterima. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian Quasi Experiment dengan rancangan Non Randomized Pretest-Posttest Design. Populasi penelitian adalah suami yang istrinya sedang hamil di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Sukamakmur Kabupaten Bogor di Desa Sirnajaya dan Desa Cibadak. Metode pengambilan sampel adalah secara accidental sampling yang terdiri dari dua kelompok, yaitu kelompok Brainstorming sebanyak 63 responden dan kelompok buzz Group sebanyak 61 responden. Analisis uji statistik menggunakan uji Wilcoxon dan Mann-Whitney. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengetahuan responden sebelum dan segera setelah proses Pendidikan Kesehatan mengalami peningkatan (p<0,001). Hasil uji Mann-Whitney menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan nilai median pengetahuan responden pada kelompok buzz Group adalah lebih baik dibandingkan Brainstorming. Metode Pendidikan Kesehatan Brainstorming dan buzz Group mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengetahuan responden tentang tanda bahaya kehamilan, persalinan, dan nifas. Kata kunci: Brainstorming; Buzz Group; Pengetahuan; Tanda bahaya kehamilan. ABSTRACT It is important to give the husbands of pregnant women, as decision makers in the family, health education about the danger signs in pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum. Methods of Brainstorming and buzz Group on health education are able to stimulate the active role of participants of a discussion, so they accept the information given to them more easily. This was a Quasi Experimental Study with Non Randomized Pretest-Posttest design. Population in this study consisted of the husbands whose wife was pregnant and lived in the work area of Sukamakmur Puskesmas (Community Health Center) in Bogor District. Accidental sampling method was used and it involved two Groups, namely Brainstorming Group consisting of 63 respondents and buzz Group consisting of 61 respondents. Statistical analysis used Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests. The results showed that the respondents knowledge was improved immediately after the health education had been given (p <0.001). The results of Mann-Whitney test described that the increased median value of knowledge of the respondents in buzz Group was better than that in Brainstorming Group. The conclusion shows that Buzz Group has better impacts on the increased median value of the respondents’ knowledge. Key Words: Brainstroming, Buzz Group; Knowledge; Danger sign of pregnancy.

Svenja C Sommer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the effects of problem structure and team diversity on Brainstorming effectiveness
    Management Science, 2009
    Co-Authors: Stylianos Kavadias, Svenja C Sommer
    Abstract:

    Since Osborn's Applied Imagination book in 1953 (Osborn, A. F. 1953. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York), the effectiveness of Brainstorming has been widely debated. While some researchers and practitioners consider it the standard idea generation and problem-solving method in organizations, part of the social science literature has argued in favor of nominal Groups, i.e., the same number of individuals generating solutions in isolation. In this paper, we revisit this debate, and we explore the implications that the underlying problem structure and the team diversity have on the quality of the best solution as obtained by the different Group configurations. We build on the normative search literature of new product development, and we show that no Group configuration dominates. Therefore, nominal Groups perform better in specialized problems, even when the factors that affect the solution quality exhibit complex interactions (problem complexity). In cross-functional problems, the Brainstorming Group exploits the competence diversity of its participants to attain better solutions. However, their advantage vanishes for extremely complex problems.

Kumlin Anthony - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Brainstorming VS Nominal Group technique online : En jämförelse mellan idégenereringsmetoderna Brainstorming och nominal Group technique i en online miljö
    Mälardalens högskola Akademin för innovation design och teknik, 2020
    Co-Authors: Alexandersson Christer, Kumlin Anthony
    Abstract:

    Denna studie har två syften, det första är att undersöka om idégenereringsmetoderna Brainstorming och nominal Group technique kan förväntas ge liknande resultat, beroende på om idégenereringsprocessen genomförs på en fysisk plats eller i en online miljö. Det andra syftet är att testa de båda idégenererings metoderna i en mer verklig situation, med en fråga som ställdes av studiens uppdragsgivare och samarbetspartner Coompanion. Detta genomfördes i form utav en workshop som hölls tillsammans med Coompanion. Med tanke på den rådande världssituationen våren 2020, så testades detta i form utav ett kvasiexperiment, där ingen kontrollgrupp kunde skapas. Anledningen till detta var den rådande pandemin som gör att personer inte gärna ska samlas i grupper, vilket ledde till att man i denna studie jämför med de resultat man fått med ett fysiskt experiment utav Miller (2009). Resultatet i studien pekar på att den skillnad i genererade idéer som normalt finns mellan Brainstorming och nominal Group technique fortfarande existerar. Däremot visar studien att det totala antalet idéer från online grupperna, genererade lite mer än hälften så många idéer som Millers (2009) grupper, vilket pekar på att idégenerering online fortfarande inte håller måttet mot en fysisk idégenerering. Man såg även att de idéer som genererades av nominal Group technique gruppen, var mer kreativa än Brainstorming gruppen, när det kom till frågan tillhörande Coompanion.The aim of this study can be separated into two purposes. The first purpose is to explore if the idea generation methods known as Brainstorming and nominal Group technique would give similar results depending on if the idea generating process was conducted in a physical space, compared to an online space. The second purpose of this study was to test both of the idea generating methods with a less lab focused situation, by asking a question that focuses on a real problem that the Company Coompanion, our partner in this study wanted answered. These purposes were tried in a workshop held with our partner Coompanion. Given the prevailing world situation in the spring of 2020, the experiment had to take on the form of a quasi-experiment where no control Group could be created. The reason for this was the global pandemic and the government recommendation of not gathering in Groups if it is avoidable, which led this study to compare with results obtained by a physical experiment made by Miller (2009). The results of the study indicates that the difference in the amount of generated ideas that normally exists between Brainstorming and nominal Group technique still exists. Although in contrast, the study shows that the total number of ideas from the online Groups generated just a little more than half of the ideas compared to Millers (2009) physical Groups. This indicates that idea generating online still doesn't measure up to a physical idea generating process. It was also shown that the ideas generated by the online nominal Group technique Group were more creative then the Brainstorming Group when it came to the question that Coompanion asked