Business Modeling Tool

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 9288 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Ravi S Sharma - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • towards a strategic Tool for the Business Modeling of idm startups implementing the advisor framework
    2011
    Co-Authors: Ravi S Sharma
    Abstract:

    This paper describes the ADVISOR online Tool for Interactive Digital Media (IDM) Business Modeling. The research objective was to develop an online Business Modeling Tool for de-novo IDM firms based on the ADVISOR framework. The Tool supports the Business strategy of startups, incubators and new firms in the IDM marketplace such as content, applications and service providers. The core concept of the ADVISOR framework is that the value of a product or service offering in the digital marketplace is governed by the interaction among seven distinct components. The online Tool that was implemented is based on the notions of value create and value capture described in the strategy literature. The field research suggests that it is useful to perform such a profile analysis on a yearly basis so as to benchmark and track the firm’s performance. This enables entrepreneurs to think in terms of what can bring about new opportunities and what can return back to the firm goodwill and revenue from the market.

Kai Pastor - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • gengraph a multi grammar and multi perspective Business Modeling Tool overview of conceptualization and implementation
    2004
    Co-Authors: Peter Fettke, Peter Loos, Kai Pastor
    Abstract:

    Within the information systems field, Modeling of Business systems results in complex information models which demand appropriate Tool support. This paper discusses the motivation and development of a generic editor for information Modeling. Our approach enables the user to configure the concepts of the utilized Modeling grammars. So, this approach does not implement a specific set of Modeling grammars. Instead it is based on a flexible meta-model which uses typed graph descriptions and allows multi-perspective Modeling of Business systems. Furthermore, we introduce the concepts of modules and links as means to deal with complex Business models. Shortcomings and problems with graph-based descriptions of Modeling grammars are discussed.

Peter Fettke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • gengraph a multi grammar and multi perspective Business Modeling Tool overview of conceptualization and implementation
    2004
    Co-Authors: Peter Fettke, Peter Loos, Kai Pastor
    Abstract:

    Within the information systems field, Modeling of Business systems results in complex information models which demand appropriate Tool support. This paper discusses the motivation and development of a generic editor for information Modeling. Our approach enables the user to configure the concepts of the utilized Modeling grammars. So, this approach does not implement a specific set of Modeling grammars. Instead it is based on a flexible meta-model which uses typed graph descriptions and allows multi-perspective Modeling of Business systems. Furthermore, we introduce the concepts of modules and links as means to deal with complex Business models. Shortcomings and problems with graph-based descriptions of Modeling grammars are discussed.

Munindar P Singh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • protos a cross organizational Business Modeling Tool demonstration
    2012
    Co-Authors: Anup K Kalia, Pankaj R Telang, Munindar P Singh
    Abstract:

    Traditional approaches to cross-organizational Business Modeling use low-level abstractions such as data and control flow. These approaches result in rigid models that over-constrain Business execution. Further, because such approaches ignore the underlying Business relationships that drive process execution, they lack the notion of Business level correctness.Telang and Singh [5] propose a high-level Business Modeling approach based upon (social) commitments to address these short-comings. The high-level model captures the Business relationships in terms of commitments between the participants. Telang and Singh [5] develop a method for verifying if a low-level interaction model satisfies a high-level Business model. They propose a top-down methodology in which a Business analyst first develops a high-level Business model. An IT analyst then develops UML 2.0 sequence diagrams, and verifies if they satisfy the high-level model.Protos is an Eclipse-based Tool that implements Telang and Singh's [5] methodology. It enables: (a) the development of a high-level Business model using reusable patterns, (b) the development of UML 2.0 sequence diagrams, as a low-level operational representation, and (c) the automated verification of the UML 2.0 sequence diagrams with respect to the high-level Business model.

Peter Loos - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • gengraph a multi grammar and multi perspective Business Modeling Tool overview of conceptualization and implementation
    2004
    Co-Authors: Peter Fettke, Peter Loos, Kai Pastor
    Abstract:

    Within the information systems field, Modeling of Business systems results in complex information models which demand appropriate Tool support. This paper discusses the motivation and development of a generic editor for information Modeling. Our approach enables the user to configure the concepts of the utilized Modeling grammars. So, this approach does not implement a specific set of Modeling grammars. Instead it is based on a flexible meta-model which uses typed graph descriptions and allows multi-perspective Modeling of Business systems. Furthermore, we introduce the concepts of modules and links as means to deal with complex Business models. Shortcomings and problems with graph-based descriptions of Modeling grammars are discussed.