The Experts below are selected from a list of 3690 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Benjamin Hayward - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
eisenwerk reconsidered twice a case note on Cargill international sa v peabody australia mining ltd and wagners nouvelle caledonie sarl v vale inco nouvelle caledonie sas
Deakin Law Review, 2010Co-Authors: Benjamin HaywardAbstract:The key aspects and features of the cases of Cargill International SA v Peabody Australia Mining Ltd, and Wagners Nouvelle Caledonie SARL v Vale Inco Niuvelle Calednie SAS to arrive at a better understanding of Eisenerk in Australian law are discussed. The important implications of the decisions are highlighted.
-
eisenwerk reconsidered twice a case note on Cargill international sa v peabody australia mining ltd and wagners nouvelle caledonie sarl v vale inco nouvelle caledonie sas
Social Science Research Network, 2010Co-Authors: Benjamin HaywardAbstract:On 2 July 1999, the Queensland Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Australian Granites Ltd v Eisenwerk Hensel Bayreuth Dipl-Ing Burkhardt GmbH. The case, which concerned the legal framework governing an international commercial arbitration, became instantly infamous for establishing the so-called Eisenwerk principle, pursuant to which the adoption of arbitration rules was said to constitute a displacement of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The decision was not well received in arbitration circles, with a number of academic commentaries criticising the approach taken in Eisenwerk to the interactions and relationships between the curial law governing an arbitration, and procedural rules which may be adopted for the purposes of conducting an arbitration.More than 10 years later, in August 2010, two different courts in two different Australian states had occasion to review the Eisenwerk principle. On 11 August 2010, the New South Wales Supreme Court handed down its decision in Cargill International SA v Peabody Australia Mining Ltd. Just nine days later, the Queensland Court of Appeal itself reconsidered Eisenwerk in Wagners Nouvelle Caledonie Sarl v Vale Inco Nouvelle Caledonie SAS.This case note comprises four main parts. In Part II, the legal background to the two recent decisions (that background consisting of the Eisenwerk case and Australia’s international commercial arbitration legislation) is reviewed. In Parts III and IV, Cargill International SA and Wagners respectively are examined. Finally, in Part V, the current status of Eisenwerk in Australian law (in light of these two decisions and recent legislative reforms) is considered. Both decisions are notable not only because of the controversy surrounding the original Eisenwerk decision, but also because of the differing approach each takes to the Eisenwerk principle and the place that principle now occupies within an amended legislative regime for international commercial arbitration in Australia.
Elizabeth Majestic - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
building company health promotion capacity a unique collaboration between Cargill and the centers for disease control and prevention
Preventing Chronic Disease, 2009Co-Authors: Jason E Lang, James Hersey, Karen L Isenberg, Christina M Lynch, Elizabeth MajesticAbstract:BACKGROUND The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) helps protect the health and safety of all people. The workplace can be used to reach millions of workers and their families with programs, policies, and benefits that promote health. We describe a CDC-led project to build Cargill's workplace health promotion capacity and identify the importance of a company liaison in the public-private relationship. CONTEXT The project goals were to engage diverse Cargill personnel, conduct a workplace health assessment, aid in the development of a workplace health program action plan, and develop Cargill's internal capacity using knowledge and skill-building. METHODS CDC partnered with Cargill on a workplace health promotion project to build Cargill's capacity. A multicomponent assessment was conducted to determine priority employee health issues, stakeholder meetings were held to engage and educate Cargill management and employees, and technical assistance was provided regularly between CDC and Cargill. CONSEQUENCES Identifying a company liaison to work with an external assessment team is critical to building capacity for a successful workplace health project. This relationship creates an understanding of company culture and operations, facilitates access to key stakeholders and data, and provides opportunities to enhance capacity and sustainability. INTERPRETATION Employers undertaking workplace health promotion projects should identify a senior-level person to serve as the company health leader or liaison and who can devote the time necessary to build trusting relationships with partners to ensure project success. This person is valuable in facilitating communications, data collection, logistical support, troubleshooting, and influencing employer workplace health practices.
-
building company health promotion capacity a unique collaboration between Cargill and the centers for disease control and prevention community case study
2009Co-Authors: Jason E Lang, James Hersey, Karen L Isenberg, Christina M Lynch, Elizabeth MajesticAbstract:Background The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) helps protect the health and safety of all people. The workplace can be used to reach millions of workers and their families with programs, policies, and benefits that promote health. We describe a CDC-led project to build Cargill’s workplace health promotion capacity and identify the importance of a company liaison in the publicprivate relationship. Context The project goals were to engage diverse Cargill personnel, conduct a workplace health assessment, aid in the development of a workplace health program action plan, and develop Cargill’s internal capacity using knowledge and skill-building. Methods
Jason E Lang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
building company health promotion capacity a unique collaboration between Cargill and the centers for disease control and prevention
Preventing Chronic Disease, 2009Co-Authors: Jason E Lang, James Hersey, Karen L Isenberg, Christina M Lynch, Elizabeth MajesticAbstract:BACKGROUND The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) helps protect the health and safety of all people. The workplace can be used to reach millions of workers and their families with programs, policies, and benefits that promote health. We describe a CDC-led project to build Cargill's workplace health promotion capacity and identify the importance of a company liaison in the public-private relationship. CONTEXT The project goals were to engage diverse Cargill personnel, conduct a workplace health assessment, aid in the development of a workplace health program action plan, and develop Cargill's internal capacity using knowledge and skill-building. METHODS CDC partnered with Cargill on a workplace health promotion project to build Cargill's capacity. A multicomponent assessment was conducted to determine priority employee health issues, stakeholder meetings were held to engage and educate Cargill management and employees, and technical assistance was provided regularly between CDC and Cargill. CONSEQUENCES Identifying a company liaison to work with an external assessment team is critical to building capacity for a successful workplace health project. This relationship creates an understanding of company culture and operations, facilitates access to key stakeholders and data, and provides opportunities to enhance capacity and sustainability. INTERPRETATION Employers undertaking workplace health promotion projects should identify a senior-level person to serve as the company health leader or liaison and who can devote the time necessary to build trusting relationships with partners to ensure project success. This person is valuable in facilitating communications, data collection, logistical support, troubleshooting, and influencing employer workplace health practices.
-
building company health promotion capacity a unique collaboration between Cargill and the centers for disease control and prevention community case study
2009Co-Authors: Jason E Lang, James Hersey, Karen L Isenberg, Christina M Lynch, Elizabeth MajesticAbstract:Background The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) helps protect the health and safety of all people. The workplace can be used to reach millions of workers and their families with programs, policies, and benefits that promote health. We describe a CDC-led project to build Cargill’s workplace health promotion capacity and identify the importance of a company liaison in the publicprivate relationship. Context The project goals were to engage diverse Cargill personnel, conduct a workplace health assessment, aid in the development of a workplace health program action plan, and develop Cargill’s internal capacity using knowledge and skill-building. Methods
Reese, John C. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Categories of Resistance, Antibiosis and Tolerance, to Biotype I Greenbug (\u3ci\u3eSchizaphis graminum\u3c/i\u3e (Rondani) Homoptera: Aphididae) in Four Sorghum (\u3ci\u3eSorghum bicolor\u3c/i\u3e (L.) Moench. Poales:Gramineae) Hybrids
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2007Co-Authors: Dogramaci Mahmut, Mayo Z. B., Wright, Robert J., Reese, John C.Abstract:Resistance categories (antibiosis and tolerance) of four sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) hybrids to biotype I greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), were determined in environmental growth chamber and field studies. Greenbug weight and fecundity were lower on ‘Cargill 607E’ compared with ‘Cargill 797’. Percentage of leaf damage area was significantly less on two resistant hybrids (Cargill 607E and Cargill 797) after a 14-d greenbug feeding period compared to two susceptible hybrids (‘Golden Harvest 510B’ and Garst 5715). In growth chamber studies on sorghum seedlings, ‘Cargill 607E’ and ‘Cargill 797’ reduced greenbug weight significantly compared with ‘Golden Harvest 510B’ and ‘Garst 5715’. Greenbug weight was 2.9 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Cargill 607E’, 3.1 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Cargill 797’, 3.9 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Golden Harvest 510B’, and 4.8 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Garst 5715’. On field grown sorghum plants, ‘Cargill 797’ did not reduce greenbug growth compared with ‘Golden Harvest 510B’. ‘Cargill 607E’ had a negative impact on weight of greenbugs. Greenbug weight was 7.9 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Cargill 607E’, 9.2 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Cargill 797’, and 10.0 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Golden Harvest 510B’. ‘Cargill 607E’ and ‘Cargill 797’ were resistant to biotype I greenbugs compared with susceptible ‘Golden Harvest 510B’ and ‘Garst 5715’. Antibiosis was confirmed as the primary category of resistance in ‘Cargill 607E.’ ‘Cargill 797’ was primarily tolerant but may have some level of antibiosis, because smaller greenbugs developed in some of the studies
-
Tritrophic Interaction of Parasitoid \u3ci\u3eLysiphlebus testaceipes \u3c/i\u3e(Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), Greenbug, \u3ci\u3eSchizaphis graminum\u3c/i\u3e (Homoptera: Aphididae), and Greenbug-Resistant Sorghum Hybrids
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2005Co-Authors: Dogramaci Mahmut, Mayo Z. B., Wright, Robert J., Reese, John C.Abstract:Interactions of the parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Cresson) and the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), on greenbug-resistant ‘Cargill 607E’ (antibiosis), ‘Cargill 797’ (primarily tolerance), and -susceptible ‘Golden Harvest 510B’ sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench, were tested using three levels of biotype I greenbug infestation. The parasitoid infestation rate was 0.5 female and 1.0 male L. testaceipes per plant. For all three greenbug infestation levels, the parasitoid brought the greenbug under control (i.e., prevented the greenbugs from killing the plants) on both resistant hybrids, but it did not prevent heavy leaf damage at the higher greenbug infestation rates. At the low greenbug infestation rate (50 greenbugs per resistant plant when parasitoids were introduced), greenbugs damaged 5 and 18% of the total leaf area on ‘Cargill 797’ and ‘Cargill 607E’, respectively, before greenbugs were eliminated. Leaf damage was higher for the intermediate infestation study (120 greenbugs per plant), 21% and 30% leaf area were damaged on the resistant sorghum hybrids ‘Cargill 797’ and ‘Cargill 607E’, respectively. At the high greenbug infestation rate (300 greenbugs per plant), heavy damage occurred: 61% on ‘Cargill 607E’ and 75% on ‘Cargill 797’. The parasitoids did not control greenbugs on the susceptible sorghum hybrid ’Golden Harvest 510B’. L. testaceipes provided comparable control on both greenbug-resistant hybrids. This study supports previous studies indicating that L. testaceipes is effective in controlling greenbugs on sorghum with antibiosis resistance to greenbugs. Furthermore, new information is provided indicating that L. testaceipes is also effective in controlling greenbugs on a greenbug-tolerant hybrid
Robert J Wright - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
categories of resistance antibiosis and tolerance to biotype i greenbug schizaphis graminum rondani homoptera aphididae in four sorghum sorghum bicolor l moench poales gramineae hybrids
Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 2007Co-Authors: Mahmut Dogramaci, Z B Mayo, Robert J WrightAbstract:Abstract Resistance categories (antibiosis and tolerance) of four sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) hybrids to biotype I greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), were determined in environmental growth chamber and field studies. Greenbug weight and fecundity were lower on ‘Cargill 607E’ compared with ‘Cargill 797’. Percentage of leaf damage area was significantly less on two resistant hybrids (Cargill 607E and Cargill 797) after a 14-d greenbug feeding period compared to two susceptible hybrids (‘Golden Harvest 510B’ and Garst 5715). In growth chamber studies on sorghum seedlings, ‘Cargill 607E’ and ‘Cargill 797’ reduced greenbug weight significantly compared with ‘Golden Harvest 510B’ and ‘Garst 5715’. Greenbug weight was 2.9 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Cargill 607E’, 3.1 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Cargill 797’, 3.9 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Golden Harvest 510B’, and 4.8 mg/25 greenbugs on ‘Garst 5715’. On field grown sorghum plants, ‘Cargill 797’ did not reduce greenbug growth compared with ‘Golden Harvest 510B’. ‘Cargi...
-
tritrophic interaction of parasitoid lysiphlebus testaceipes hymenoptera aphidiidae greenbug schizaphis graminum homoptera aphididae and greenbug resistant sorghum hybrids
Journal of Economic Entomology, 2005Co-Authors: Mahmut Dogramaci, Z B Mayo, Robert J WrightAbstract:Interactions of the parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Cresson) and the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), on greenbug-resistant OCargill 607EO (antibiosis), OCargill 797O (pri- marily tolerance), and -susceptible OGolden Harvest 510BO sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench, were tested using three levels of biotype I greenbug infestation. The parasitoid infestation rate was 0.5 female and 1.0 male L. testaceipes per plant. For all three greenbug infestation levels, the parasitoid brought the greenbug under control (i.e., prevented the greenbugs from killing the plants) on both resistant hybrids, but it did not prevent heavy leaf damage at the higher greenbug infestation rates. At the low greenbug infestation rate (50 greenbugs per resistant plant when parasitoids were introduced), greenbugs damaged 5 and 18% of the total leaf area on OCargill 797O and OCargill 607EO, respectively, before greenbugs were eliminated. Leaf damage was higher for the intermediate infes- tation study (120 greenbugs per plant), 21% and 30% leaf area were damaged on the resistant sorghum hybrids OCargill 797O and OCargill 607EO, respectively. At the high greenbug infestation rate (300 greenbugs per plant), heavy damage occurred: 61% on OCargill 607EO and 75% on OCargill 797O. The parasitoids did not control greenbugs on the susceptible sorghum hybrid OGolden Harvest 510BO. L. testaceipes provided comparable control on both greenbug-resistant hybrids. This study supports previous studies indicating that L. testaceipes is effective in controlling greenbugs on sorghum with antibiosis resistance to greenbugs. Furthermore, new information is provided indicating that L. testaceipes is also effective in controlling greenbugs on a greenbug-tolerant hybrid.