The Experts below are selected from a list of 5295 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Jorge Castaño - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Parinaud’s Oculoglandular Syndrome in Cat Scratch Disease
The New England Journal of Medicine, 2018Co-Authors: Catalina Arango-ferreira, Jorge CastañoAbstract:Parinaud’s Oculoglandular Syndrome in Cat Scratch Disease A 5-year-old girl who frequently played with a Cat presented with an eyelid papule and preauricular and submandibular masses on the left side of her face. A diagnosis of Cat Scratch disease was made.
-
parinaud s oculoglandular syndrome in Cat Scratch disease
The New England Journal of Medicine, 2018Co-Authors: Catalina Arangoferreira, Jorge CastañoAbstract:Parinaud’s Oculoglandular Syndrome in Cat Scratch Disease A 5-year-old girl who frequently played with a Cat presented with an eyelid papule and preauricular and submandibular masses on the left side of her face. A diagnosis of Cat Scratch disease was made.
Catalina Arangoferreira - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
parinaud s oculoglandular syndrome in Cat Scratch disease
The New England Journal of Medicine, 2018Co-Authors: Catalina Arangoferreira, Jorge CastañoAbstract:Parinaud’s Oculoglandular Syndrome in Cat Scratch Disease A 5-year-old girl who frequently played with a Cat presented with an eyelid papule and preauricular and submandibular masses on the left side of her face. A diagnosis of Cat Scratch disease was made.
Corrie M. Yablon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sonography of Cat Scratch disease
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2015Co-Authors: David M Melville, Brian K. Downie, Jeanette S. Biermann, Jon A Jacobson, Corrie M. YablonAbstract:Abstract To characterize the sonographic features of Cat Scratch disease and to identify features that allow differentiation from other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. After Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, patients who underwent sonography for a medial epitrochlear mass or lymph node were identified via the radiology information system. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease, based on pathologic results and clinical information. Sonograms were retrospectively reviewed and characterized with respect to dimension, shape (round, oval, or lobular), symmetry, loCation (subcutaneous or intramuscular), multiplicity, echogenicity (anechoic, hypoechoic, isoechoic, hyperechoic, or mixed), hyperechoic hilum (present or absent), adjacent anechoic or hypoechoic area, hyperemia (present or absent), pattern of hyperemia if present (central, peripheral, or mixed), increased posterior through-transmission (present or absent), and shadowing (present or absent). Sonographic findings were compared between the patients with and without Cat Scratch disease. The final patient group consisted of 5 cases of Cat Scratch disease and 16 cases of other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. The 2 sonographic findings that were significantly different between the Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease cases included mass asymmetry (P = .0062) and the presence of a hyperechoic hilum (P = .0075). The other sonographic findings showed no significant differences between the groups. The sonographic finding of an epitrochlear mass due to Cat Scratch disease most commonly is that of a hypoechoic lobular or oval mass with central hyperemia and a possible adjacent fluid collection; however, the presence of asymmetry and a hyperechoic hilum differentiate Cat Scratch disease from other etiologies.
-
Sonography of Cat Scratch disease.
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2015Co-Authors: David M Melville, Jeanette S. Biermann, Jon A Jacobson, Brian Downie, Sung Moon Kim, Corrie M. YablonAbstract:Objectives To characterize the sonographic features of Cat Scratch disease and to identify features that allow differentiation from other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, patients who underwent sonography for a medial epitrochlear mass or lymph node were identified via the radiology information system. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease, based on pathologic results and clinical information. Sonograms were retrospectively reviewed and characterized with respect to dimension, shape (round, oval, or lobular), symmetry, loCation (subcutaneous or intramuscular), multiplicity, echogenicity (anechoic, hypoechoic, isoechoic, hyperechoic, or mixed), hyperechoic hilum (present or absent), adjacent anechoic or hypoechoic area, hyperemia (present or absent), pattern of hyperemia if present (central, peripheral, or mixed), increased posterior through-transmission (present or absent), and shadowing (present or absent). Sonographic findings were compared between the patients with and without Cat Scratch disease. Results The final patient group consisted of 5 cases of Cat Scratch disease and 16 cases of other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. The 2 sonographic findings that were significantly different between the Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease cases included mass asymmetry (P = .0062) and the presence of a hyperechoic hilum (P = .0075). The other sonographic findings showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions The sonographic finding of an epitrochlear mass due to Cat Scratch disease most commonly is that of a hypoechoic lobular or oval mass with central hyperemia and a possible adjacent fluid collection; however, the presence of asymmetry and a hyperechoic hilum differentiate Cat Scratch disease from other etiologies.
David M Melville - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sonography of Cat Scratch disease
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2015Co-Authors: David M Melville, Brian K. Downie, Jeanette S. Biermann, Jon A Jacobson, Corrie M. YablonAbstract:Abstract To characterize the sonographic features of Cat Scratch disease and to identify features that allow differentiation from other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. After Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, patients who underwent sonography for a medial epitrochlear mass or lymph node were identified via the radiology information system. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease, based on pathologic results and clinical information. Sonograms were retrospectively reviewed and characterized with respect to dimension, shape (round, oval, or lobular), symmetry, loCation (subcutaneous or intramuscular), multiplicity, echogenicity (anechoic, hypoechoic, isoechoic, hyperechoic, or mixed), hyperechoic hilum (present or absent), adjacent anechoic or hypoechoic area, hyperemia (present or absent), pattern of hyperemia if present (central, peripheral, or mixed), increased posterior through-transmission (present or absent), and shadowing (present or absent). Sonographic findings were compared between the patients with and without Cat Scratch disease. The final patient group consisted of 5 cases of Cat Scratch disease and 16 cases of other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. The 2 sonographic findings that were significantly different between the Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease cases included mass asymmetry (P = .0062) and the presence of a hyperechoic hilum (P = .0075). The other sonographic findings showed no significant differences between the groups. The sonographic finding of an epitrochlear mass due to Cat Scratch disease most commonly is that of a hypoechoic lobular or oval mass with central hyperemia and a possible adjacent fluid collection; however, the presence of asymmetry and a hyperechoic hilum differentiate Cat Scratch disease from other etiologies.
-
Sonography of Cat Scratch disease.
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2015Co-Authors: David M Melville, Jeanette S. Biermann, Jon A Jacobson, Brian Downie, Sung Moon Kim, Corrie M. YablonAbstract:Objectives To characterize the sonographic features of Cat Scratch disease and to identify features that allow differentiation from other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, patients who underwent sonography for a medial epitrochlear mass or lymph node were identified via the radiology information system. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease, based on pathologic results and clinical information. Sonograms were retrospectively reviewed and characterized with respect to dimension, shape (round, oval, or lobular), symmetry, loCation (subcutaneous or intramuscular), multiplicity, echogenicity (anechoic, hypoechoic, isoechoic, hyperechoic, or mixed), hyperechoic hilum (present or absent), adjacent anechoic or hypoechoic area, hyperemia (present or absent), pattern of hyperemia if present (central, peripheral, or mixed), increased posterior through-transmission (present or absent), and shadowing (present or absent). Sonographic findings were compared between the patients with and without Cat Scratch disease. Results The final patient group consisted of 5 cases of Cat Scratch disease and 16 cases of other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. The 2 sonographic findings that were significantly different between the Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease cases included mass asymmetry (P = .0062) and the presence of a hyperechoic hilum (P = .0075). The other sonographic findings showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions The sonographic finding of an epitrochlear mass due to Cat Scratch disease most commonly is that of a hypoechoic lobular or oval mass with central hyperemia and a possible adjacent fluid collection; however, the presence of asymmetry and a hyperechoic hilum differentiate Cat Scratch disease from other etiologies.
Jeanette S. Biermann - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sonography of Cat Scratch disease
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2015Co-Authors: David M Melville, Brian K. Downie, Jeanette S. Biermann, Jon A Jacobson, Corrie M. YablonAbstract:Abstract To characterize the sonographic features of Cat Scratch disease and to identify features that allow differentiation from other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. After Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, patients who underwent sonography for a medial epitrochlear mass or lymph node were identified via the radiology information system. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease, based on pathologic results and clinical information. Sonograms were retrospectively reviewed and characterized with respect to dimension, shape (round, oval, or lobular), symmetry, loCation (subcutaneous or intramuscular), multiplicity, echogenicity (anechoic, hypoechoic, isoechoic, hyperechoic, or mixed), hyperechoic hilum (present or absent), adjacent anechoic or hypoechoic area, hyperemia (present or absent), pattern of hyperemia if present (central, peripheral, or mixed), increased posterior through-transmission (present or absent), and shadowing (present or absent). Sonographic findings were compared between the patients with and without Cat Scratch disease. The final patient group consisted of 5 cases of Cat Scratch disease and 16 cases of other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. The 2 sonographic findings that were significantly different between the Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease cases included mass asymmetry (P = .0062) and the presence of a hyperechoic hilum (P = .0075). The other sonographic findings showed no significant differences between the groups. The sonographic finding of an epitrochlear mass due to Cat Scratch disease most commonly is that of a hypoechoic lobular or oval mass with central hyperemia and a possible adjacent fluid collection; however, the presence of asymmetry and a hyperechoic hilum differentiate Cat Scratch disease from other etiologies.
-
Sonography of Cat Scratch disease.
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2015Co-Authors: David M Melville, Jeanette S. Biermann, Jon A Jacobson, Brian Downie, Sung Moon Kim, Corrie M. YablonAbstract:Objectives To characterize the sonographic features of Cat Scratch disease and to identify features that allow differentiation from other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, patients who underwent sonography for a medial epitrochlear mass or lymph node were identified via the radiology information system. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease, based on pathologic results and clinical information. Sonograms were retrospectively reviewed and characterized with respect to dimension, shape (round, oval, or lobular), symmetry, loCation (subcutaneous or intramuscular), multiplicity, echogenicity (anechoic, hypoechoic, isoechoic, hyperechoic, or mixed), hyperechoic hilum (present or absent), adjacent anechoic or hypoechoic area, hyperemia (present or absent), pattern of hyperemia if present (central, peripheral, or mixed), increased posterior through-transmission (present or absent), and shadowing (present or absent). Sonographic findings were compared between the patients with and without Cat Scratch disease. Results The final patient group consisted of 5 cases of Cat Scratch disease and 16 cases of other causes of medial epitrochlear masses. The 2 sonographic findings that were significantly different between the Cat Scratch disease and non-Cat Scratch disease cases included mass asymmetry (P = .0062) and the presence of a hyperechoic hilum (P = .0075). The other sonographic findings showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions The sonographic finding of an epitrochlear mass due to Cat Scratch disease most commonly is that of a hypoechoic lobular or oval mass with central hyperemia and a possible adjacent fluid collection; however, the presence of asymmetry and a hyperechoic hilum differentiate Cat Scratch disease from other etiologies.
