The Experts below are selected from a list of 4812 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Virginia Aguillon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
impact of evidence based Charge Nurse education on Charge Nurse skills and Nurse specific metrics
Journal of Nursing Administration, 2021Co-Authors: Jean Dowling Dols, Monica N Ramirez, Ashley D Hernandez, David B Allen, Theresa Kloewer, Virginia AguillonAbstract:OBJECTIVE This research study was designed to analyze the impact of an evidence-based Charge Nurse (CN) education program on novice and experienced CNs' self-confidence and satisfaction with the role, skill competencies, and nursing metrics. BACKGROUND Charge Nurses are critical to effective daily unit operations. However, executive nursing leadership found that unit performance varied by CN despite experience. METHODS University faculty partnering with Nurse leaders developed an evidence-based CN education program including a series of classes, coaching in skills and role responsibilities by Nurse leaders, and evaluation of skills competencies before and after the CN education program. RESULTS The CN program was associated with significant positive changes in CN performance, Nurse-specific metrics, hospital-acquired events, and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Interventions targeting frontline leaders positively impact CN performance.
Mary Krugman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
longitudinal Charge Nurse leadership development and evaluation
Journal of Nursing Administration, 2013Co-Authors: Mary Krugman, Laura Heggem, Lisa Judd Kinney, Margaret FruehAbstract:OBJECTIVE The study's aim was to examine longitudinal outcomes of a leadership program for permanent and relief Charge Nurse from 1996 to 2012 using action research and Kouzes and Posner's The Leadership Challenge conceptual frameworks. BACKGROUND Charge Nurses hold significant oversight of patient safety, quality, and team functioning. This study contributes knowledge regarding Charge Nurse leadership and organization outcomes associated with these essential roles over time. METHODS Data were collected over 6 time periods using Kouzes and Posner's The Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) and internally developed action research tools. Surveys were aligned with leadership and work environment changes to examine outcomes. RESULTS Charge Nurse leadership LPI mean ratings improved. Relief Charge Nurses reached similar LPI outcomes by 2012, with no statistical differences in mean or domain scores. Action research methods facilitated executive decision making during change processes. Demographics shifted with younger Charge Nurses with less practice experience serving as Charge Nurses in the most recent years. CONCLUSIONS Charge Nurse leadership reported significant gains despite institutional changes and uneven delivery of educational interventions.
-
Charge Nurse leadership development and evaluation
Journal of Nursing Administration, 2003Co-Authors: Mary Krugman, Vivienne SmithAbstract:ObjectiveTo describe the development and evaluation of a permanent Charge Nurse role and report outcomes of this leadership model over 4 years.BackgroundA permanent Charge Nurse role was developed to improve continuity of care and develop emerging Nurse leaders. An evaluation model was constructed t
Vivienne Smith - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Charge Nurse leadership development and evaluation
Journal of Nursing Administration, 2003Co-Authors: Mary Krugman, Vivienne SmithAbstract:ObjectiveTo describe the development and evaluation of a permanent Charge Nurse role and report outcomes of this leadership model over 4 years.BackgroundA permanent Charge Nurse role was developed to improve continuity of care and develop emerging Nurse leaders. An evaluation model was constructed t
Jean Dowling Dols - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
impact of evidence based Charge Nurse education on Charge Nurse skills and Nurse specific metrics
Journal of Nursing Administration, 2021Co-Authors: Jean Dowling Dols, Monica N Ramirez, Ashley D Hernandez, David B Allen, Theresa Kloewer, Virginia AguillonAbstract:OBJECTIVE This research study was designed to analyze the impact of an evidence-based Charge Nurse (CN) education program on novice and experienced CNs' self-confidence and satisfaction with the role, skill competencies, and nursing metrics. BACKGROUND Charge Nurses are critical to effective daily unit operations. However, executive nursing leadership found that unit performance varied by CN despite experience. METHODS University faculty partnering with Nurse leaders developed an evidence-based CN education program including a series of classes, coaching in skills and role responsibilities by Nurse leaders, and evaluation of skills competencies before and after the CN education program. RESULTS The CN program was associated with significant positive changes in CN performance, Nurse-specific metrics, hospital-acquired events, and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Interventions targeting frontline leaders positively impact CN performance.
Margaret Frueh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
longitudinal Charge Nurse leadership development and evaluation
Journal of Nursing Administration, 2013Co-Authors: Mary Krugman, Laura Heggem, Lisa Judd Kinney, Margaret FruehAbstract:OBJECTIVE The study's aim was to examine longitudinal outcomes of a leadership program for permanent and relief Charge Nurse from 1996 to 2012 using action research and Kouzes and Posner's The Leadership Challenge conceptual frameworks. BACKGROUND Charge Nurses hold significant oversight of patient safety, quality, and team functioning. This study contributes knowledge regarding Charge Nurse leadership and organization outcomes associated with these essential roles over time. METHODS Data were collected over 6 time periods using Kouzes and Posner's The Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) and internally developed action research tools. Surveys were aligned with leadership and work environment changes to examine outcomes. RESULTS Charge Nurse leadership LPI mean ratings improved. Relief Charge Nurses reached similar LPI outcomes by 2012, with no statistical differences in mean or domain scores. Action research methods facilitated executive decision making during change processes. Demographics shifted with younger Charge Nurses with less practice experience serving as Charge Nurses in the most recent years. CONCLUSIONS Charge Nurse leadership reported significant gains despite institutional changes and uneven delivery of educational interventions.