The Experts below are selected from a list of 426 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Jaap J Beutler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
stent placement in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and impaired renal function
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2010Co-Authors: Liesbeth Bax, Willem Th P M Mali, Jaap J BeutlerAbstract:Background: Little is known about the efficacy and safety of renal artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) and impaired renal function. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of stent placement in patients with ARAS and impaired renal function. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Randomization was centralized and computer generated, and allocation was assigned by e-mail. Patients, providers, and persons who assessed outcomes were not blinded to treatment assignment. Setting: 10 European medical centers. Participants: 140 patients with creatinine clearance less than 80 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 and ARAS of 50% or greater. Intervention: Stent placement and medical treatment (64 patients) or medical treatment only (76 patients). Medical treatment consisted of antihypertensive treatment, a statin, and aspirin. Measurements: The primary end point was a 20% or greater decrease in creatinine clearance. Secondary end points included safety and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Results: Forty-six of 64 patients assigned to stent placement had the procedure. Ten of the 64 patients (16%) in the stent placement group and 16 patients (22%) in the medication group reached the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.61]). Serious complications occurred in the stent group, including 2 procedure-related deaths (3%), 1 late death secondary to an infected hematoma, and 1 patient who required dialysis secondary to Cholesterol Embolism. The groups did not differ for other secondary end points. Limitation: Many patients were falsely identified as having renal artery stenosis greater than 50% by noninvasive imaging and did not ultimately require stenting. Conclusion: Stent placement with medical treatment had no clear effect on progression of impaired renal function but led to a small number of significant procedure-related complications. The study findings favor a conservative approach to patients with ARAS, focused on cardiovascular risk factor management and avoiding stenting.
-
transluminal vascular stents for ostial atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis
The Lancet, 1995Co-Authors: P Van De Ven, F J A Beek, Jaap J Beutler, G G Geyskes, H A Koomans, R Kaatee, W Th P M MaliAbstract:We implanted transluminal stents in 24 hypertensive patients with a critical atherosclerotic ostial renal artery stenosis (28 arteries). Immediate revascularisation was successful in all. Follow-up angiography at 6 months, available in 18 patients, revealed restenosis twice. In another patient restenosis was suspected and confirmed by angiography at 2 months. Hence, the total restenosis rate was 3 of 19 patients (16%) and 3 of 23 arteries (13%). Two patients developed renal insufficiency due to Cholesterol Embolism. In the remaining 22 patients renal function improved (n=8) or stabilised (n=14). Although all had to resume antihypertensive treatment, blood pressure normalised in 15 patients, improved in one, remained unchanged in five and worsened in one.
Cornelius J Doorenbos - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
stent placement in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and impaired renal function a randomized trial
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2009Co-Authors: A J Woittiez, Hans J Kouwenberg, Willem Th P M Mali, Erik Buskens, F J A Beek, Branko Braam, F T M Huysmans, Leo Schultze J Kool, Matthieu J C M Rutten, Cornelius J DoorenbosAbstract:BACKGROUND: Little is known about the efficacy and safety of renal artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) and impaired renal function. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of stent placement in patients with ARAS and impaired renal function. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. Randomization was centralized and computer generated, and allocation was assigned by e-mail. Patients, providers, and persons who assessed outcomes were not blinded to treatment assignment. SETTING: 10 European medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: 140 patients with creatinine clearance less than 80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) and ARAS of 50% or greater. INTERVENTION: Stent placement and medical treatment (64 patients) or medical treatment only (76 patients). Medical treatment consisted of antihypertensive treatment, a statin, and aspirin. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was a 20% or greater decrease in creatinine clearance. Secondary end points included safety and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Forty-six of 64 patients assigned to stent placement had the procedure. Ten of the 64 patients (16%) in the stent placement group and 16 patients (22%) in the medication group reached the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.61]). Serious complications occurred in the stent group, including 2 procedure-related deaths (3%), 1 late death secondary to an infected hematoma, and 1 patient who required dialysis secondary to Cholesterol Embolism. The groups did not differ for other secondary end points. LIMITATION: Many patients were falsely identified as having renal artery stenosis greater than 50% by noninvasive imaging and did not ultimately require stenting. CONCLUSION: Stent placement with medical treatment had no clear effect on progression of impaired renal function but led to a small number of significant procedure-related complications. The study findings favor a conservative approach to patients with ARAS, focused on cardiovascular risk factor management and avoiding stenting.
Willem Th P M Mali - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
stent placement in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and impaired renal function
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2010Co-Authors: Liesbeth Bax, Willem Th P M Mali, Jaap J BeutlerAbstract:Background: Little is known about the efficacy and safety of renal artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) and impaired renal function. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of stent placement in patients with ARAS and impaired renal function. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Randomization was centralized and computer generated, and allocation was assigned by e-mail. Patients, providers, and persons who assessed outcomes were not blinded to treatment assignment. Setting: 10 European medical centers. Participants: 140 patients with creatinine clearance less than 80 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 and ARAS of 50% or greater. Intervention: Stent placement and medical treatment (64 patients) or medical treatment only (76 patients). Medical treatment consisted of antihypertensive treatment, a statin, and aspirin. Measurements: The primary end point was a 20% or greater decrease in creatinine clearance. Secondary end points included safety and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Results: Forty-six of 64 patients assigned to stent placement had the procedure. Ten of the 64 patients (16%) in the stent placement group and 16 patients (22%) in the medication group reached the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.61]). Serious complications occurred in the stent group, including 2 procedure-related deaths (3%), 1 late death secondary to an infected hematoma, and 1 patient who required dialysis secondary to Cholesterol Embolism. The groups did not differ for other secondary end points. Limitation: Many patients were falsely identified as having renal artery stenosis greater than 50% by noninvasive imaging and did not ultimately require stenting. Conclusion: Stent placement with medical treatment had no clear effect on progression of impaired renal function but led to a small number of significant procedure-related complications. The study findings favor a conservative approach to patients with ARAS, focused on cardiovascular risk factor management and avoiding stenting.
-
stent placement in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and impaired renal function a randomized trial
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2009Co-Authors: A J Woittiez, Hans J Kouwenberg, Willem Th P M Mali, Erik Buskens, F J A Beek, Branko Braam, F T M Huysmans, Leo Schultze J Kool, Matthieu J C M Rutten, Cornelius J DoorenbosAbstract:BACKGROUND: Little is known about the efficacy and safety of renal artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) and impaired renal function. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of stent placement in patients with ARAS and impaired renal function. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. Randomization was centralized and computer generated, and allocation was assigned by e-mail. Patients, providers, and persons who assessed outcomes were not blinded to treatment assignment. SETTING: 10 European medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: 140 patients with creatinine clearance less than 80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) and ARAS of 50% or greater. INTERVENTION: Stent placement and medical treatment (64 patients) or medical treatment only (76 patients). Medical treatment consisted of antihypertensive treatment, a statin, and aspirin. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was a 20% or greater decrease in creatinine clearance. Secondary end points included safety and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Forty-six of 64 patients assigned to stent placement had the procedure. Ten of the 64 patients (16%) in the stent placement group and 16 patients (22%) in the medication group reached the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.61]). Serious complications occurred in the stent group, including 2 procedure-related deaths (3%), 1 late death secondary to an infected hematoma, and 1 patient who required dialysis secondary to Cholesterol Embolism. The groups did not differ for other secondary end points. LIMITATION: Many patients were falsely identified as having renal artery stenosis greater than 50% by noninvasive imaging and did not ultimately require stenting. CONCLUSION: Stent placement with medical treatment had no clear effect on progression of impaired renal function but led to a small number of significant procedure-related complications. The study findings favor a conservative approach to patients with ARAS, focused on cardiovascular risk factor management and avoiding stenting.
Yasuyuki Yamashita - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
guidelines on the use of iodinated contrast media in patients with kidney disease 2012 digest version jsn jrs and jcs joint working group
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 2013Co-Authors: Iwao Ohno, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Kazutaka Aonuma, Masaru Horio, Naoki Kashihara, Hirokazu Okada, Yasuhiro Komatsu, Shozo Tamura, Kazuo Awai, Yasuyuki YamashitaAbstract:Open image in new window What is the definition of CIN? Answer: CIN is defined as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) levels by ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25 % from baseline within 72 h after a contrast radiography using iodinated contrast media. Open image in new window Because the risk for developing CIN increases as kidney function decreases, it is important to evaluate kidney function on the basis of the latest SCr levels prior to contrast radiography. According to the classification of the severity of CKD, which is based on the cause, GFR, and presence and severity of albuminuria (Table 1) [1], patients with a GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (G3a–G5) are considered to have CKD in this guideline. In another words, CKD is also diagnosed in patients with a GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and albuminuria, in the present guidelines only patients with a GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 are defined as having CKD. Table 1 Classification of severity of CKD (2012) Open image in new window Risks of ESKD requiring dialysis or transplantation, and risks for cardiovascular diseases such as stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure are coded with colors ranging from green (lowest), yellow, orange and red (highest) CKD chronic kidney disease, Cr creatinine, ESKD end-stage kidney disease, GFR glomerular filtration rate Adapted from KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Inter Suppl. 2013;3:19–62 [1], with permission from Nature Publishing Group., modified for Japanese patients The following formula is used to calculate estimated GFR (eGFR). Open image in new window CIN is a form of acute kidney injury (AKI) that occurs after exposure to iodinated contrast media, and is diagnosed on the basis of reducing kidney function after contrast radiography when other causes such as Cholesterol Embolism are ruled out. AKI due to CIN is generally reversible. Usually, SCr levels increase to a peak 3–5 days after onset, and return to normal in 7–14 days. However, kidney injury may worsen to the point that hemodialysis is required in some patients. The criteria for the diagnosis of CIN used in clinical research of this condition vary among studies. The minimum increment of SCr levels that defined CIN included 0.5 mg/dL, 1.0 mg/dL, and 25 % or 50 % from baseline, and the duration of monitoring for CIN included 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 4 days, and 7 days after contrast radiography. The most commonly used criteria for CIN in clinical research is an increase in SCr levels by ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25 % from baseline within 72 h after contrast radiography. However, physicians in the clinical setting should not wait for 72 h, and should start close monitoring of SCr levels from an early stage when CIN is suspected. The incidence of CIN, and clinical characteristics such as patients’ baseline kidney function, vary depending on the criteria used for diagnosis. Standardized diagnostic criteria are necessary to promote clinical research of this condition and develop preventive procedures. Open image in new window Open image in new window
-
guidelines on the use of iodinated contrast media in patients with kidney disease 2012 digest version
Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2013Co-Authors: Iwao Ohno, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Kazutaka Aonuma, Masaru Horio, Naoki Kashihara, Hirokazu Okada, Yasuhiro Komatsu, Shozo Tamura, Kazuo Awai, Yasuyuki YamashitaAbstract:Open image in new window What is the definition of CIN? Answer: CIN is defined as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) levels by ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25 % from baseline within 72 h after a contrast radiography using iodinated contrast media. Open image in new window Because the risk for developing CIN increases as kidney function decreases, it is important to evaluate kidney function on the basis of the latest SCr levels prior to contrast radiography. According to the classification of the severity of CKD, which is based on the cause, GFR, and presence and severity of albuminuria (Table 1) [1], patients with a GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (G3a–G5) are considered to have CKD in this guideline. In another words, CKD is also diagnosed in patients with a GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and albuminuria, in the present guidelines only patients with a GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 are defined as having CKD. Table 1 Classification of severity of CKD (2012) Open image in new window Risks of ESKD requiring dialysis or transplantation, and risks for cardiovascular diseases such as stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure are coded with colors ranging from green (lowest), yellow, orange and red (highest) CKD chronic kidney disease, Cr creatinine, ESKD end-stage kidney disease, GFR glomerular filtration rate Adapted from KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Inter Suppl. 2013;3:19–62 [1], with permission from Nature Publishing Group., modified for Japanese patients The following formula is used to calculate estimated GFR (eGFR). Open image in new window CIN is a form of acute kidney injury (AKI) that occurs after exposure to iodinated contrast media, and is diagnosed on the basis of reducing kidney function after contrast radiography when other causes such as Cholesterol Embolism are ruled out. AKI due to CIN is generally reversible. Usually, SCr levels increase to a peak 3–5 days after onset, and return to normal in 7–14 days. However, kidney injury may worsen to the point that hemodialysis is required in some patients. The criteria for the diagnosis of CIN used in clinical research of this condition vary among studies. The minimum increment of SCr levels that defined CIN included 0.5 mg/dL, 1.0 mg/dL, and 25 % or 50 % from baseline, and the duration of monitoring for CIN included 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 4 days, and 7 days after contrast radiography. The most commonly used criteria for CIN in clinical research is an increase in SCr levels by ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25 % from baseline within 72 h after contrast radiography. However, physicians in the clinical setting should not wait for 72 h, and should start close monitoring of SCr levels from an early stage when CIN is suspected. The incidence of CIN, and clinical characteristics such as patients’ baseline kidney function, vary depending on the criteria used for diagnosis. Standardized diagnostic criteria are necessary to promote clinical research of this condition and develop preventive procedures. Open image in new window Open image in new window
Nicholas Sowers - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
613 cases of splenic rupture without risk factors or previously diagnosed disease a systematic review
BMC Emergency Medicine, 2012Co-Authors: Kris F Aubreybassler, Nicholas SowersAbstract:Rupture of the spleen in the absence of trauma or previously diagnosed disease is largely ignored in the emergency literature and is often not documented as such in journals from other fields. We have conducted a systematic review of the literature to highlight the surprisingly frequent occurrence of this phenomenon and to document the diversity of diseases that can present in this fashion. Systematic review of English and French language publications catalogued in Pubmed, Embase and CINAHL between 1950 and 2011. We found 613 cases of splenic rupture meeting the criteria above, 327 of which occurred as the presenting complaint of an underlying disease and 112 of which occurred following a medical procedure. Rupture appeared to occur spontaneously in histologically normal (but not necessarily normal size) spleens in 35 cases and after minor trauma in 23 cases. Medications were implicated in 47 cases, a splenic or adjacent anatomical abnormality in 31 cases and pregnancy or its complications in 38 cases. The most common associated diseases were infectious (n = 143), haematologic (n = 84) and non-haematologic neoplasms (n = 48). Amyloidosis (n = 24), internal trauma such as cough or vomiting (n = 17) and rheumatologic diseases (n = 10) are less frequently reported. Colonoscopy (n = 87) was the procedure reported most frequently as a cause of rupture. The anatomic abnormalities associated with rupture include splenic cysts (n = 6), infarction (n = 6) and hamartomata (n = 5). Medications associated with rupture include anticoagulants (n = 21), thrombolytics (n = 13) and recombinant G-CSF (n = 10). Other causes or associations reported very infrequently include other endoscopy, pulmonary, cardiac or abdominal surgery, hysterectomy, peliosis, empyema, remote pancreato-renal transplant, thrombosed splenic vein, hemangiomata, pancreatic pseudocysts, splenic artery aneurysm, Cholesterol Embolism, splenic granuloma, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, rib exostosis, pancreatitis, Gaucher's disease, Wilson's disease, pheochromocytoma, afibrinogenemia and ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Emergency physicians should be attuned to the fact that rupture of the spleen can occur in the absence of major trauma or previously diagnosed splenic disease. The occurrence of such a rupture is likely to be the manifesting complaint of an underlying disease. Furthermore, colonoscopy should be more widely documented as a cause of splenic rupture.
-
613 cases of splenic rupture without risk factors or previously diagnosed disease: a systematic review
BMC Emergency Medicine, 2012Co-Authors: F Kris Aubrey-bassler, Nicholas SowersAbstract:Background Rupture of the spleen in the absence of trauma or previously diagnosed disease is largely ignored in the emergency literature and is often not documented as such in journals from other fields. We have conducted a systematic review of the literature to highlight the surprisingly frequent occurrence of this phenomenon and to document the diversity of diseases that can present in this fashion. Methods Systematic review of English and French language publications catalogued in Pubmed, Embase and CINAHL between 1950 and 2011. Results We found 613 cases of splenic rupture meeting the criteria above, 327 of which occurred as the presenting complaint of an underlying disease and 112 of which occurred following a medical procedure. Rupture appeared to occur spontaneously in histologically normal (but not necessarily normal size) spleens in 35 cases and after minor trauma in 23 cases. Medications were implicated in 47 cases, a splenic or adjacent anatomical abnormality in 31 cases and pregnancy or its complications in 38 cases. The most common associated diseases were infectious (n = 143), haematologic (n = 84) and non-haematologic neoplasms (n = 48). Amyloidosis (n = 24), internal trauma such as cough or vomiting (n = 17) and rheumatologic diseases (n = 10) are less frequently reported. Colonoscopy (n = 87) was the procedure reported most frequently as a cause of rupture. The anatomic abnormalities associated with rupture include splenic cysts (n = 6), infarction (n = 6) and hamartomata (n = 5). Medications associated with rupture include anticoagulants (n = 21), thrombolytics (n = 13) and recombinant G-CSF (n = 10). Other causes or associations reported very infrequently include other endoscopy, pulmonary, cardiac or abdominal surgery, hysterectomy, peliosis, empyema, remote pancreato-renal transplant, thrombosed splenic vein, hemangiomata, pancreatic pseudocysts, splenic artery aneurysm, Cholesterol Embolism, splenic granuloma, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, rib exostosis, pancreatitis, Gaucher's disease, Wilson's disease, pheochromocytoma, afibrinogenemia and ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Conclusions Emergency physicians should be attuned to the fact that rupture of the spleen can occur in the absence of major trauma or previously diagnosed splenic disease. The occurrence of such a rupture is likely to be the manifesting complaint of an underlying disease. Furthermore, colonoscopy should be more widely documented as a cause of splenic rupture.