The Experts below are selected from a list of 276 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Bruce G. Lyeth - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • icp monitoring in the rat comparison of monitoring in the ventricle brain parenchyma and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of Neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p<0.001). The intraparenchymal device produced greater cortical damage than the ventricular catheter. In conclusion, ventricular ICP monitoring is the preferred method under these circumstances, since it is accurate and induces least brain damage.

  • ICP Monitoring in the Rat: Comparison of Monitoring in the Ventricle, Brain Parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p

Marike Zwienenberg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • icp monitoring in the rat comparison of monitoring in the ventricle brain parenchyma and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of Neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p<0.001). The intraparenchymal device produced greater cortical damage than the ventricular catheter. In conclusion, ventricular ICP monitoring is the preferred method under these circumstances, since it is accurate and induces least brain damage.

  • ICP Monitoring in the Rat: Comparison of Monitoring in the Ventricle, Brain Parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p

Qin-zhi Gong - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • icp monitoring in the rat comparison of monitoring in the ventricle brain parenchyma and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of Neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p<0.001). The intraparenchymal device produced greater cortical damage than the ventricular catheter. In conclusion, ventricular ICP monitoring is the preferred method under these circumstances, since it is accurate and induces least brain damage.

  • ICP Monitoring in the Rat: Comparison of Monitoring in the Ventricle, Brain Parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p

Robert F. Berman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • icp monitoring in the rat comparison of monitoring in the ventricle brain parenchyma and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of Neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p<0.001). The intraparenchymal device produced greater cortical damage than the ventricular catheter. In conclusion, ventricular ICP monitoring is the preferred method under these circumstances, since it is accurate and induces least brain damage.

  • ICP Monitoring in the Rat: Comparison of Monitoring in the Ventricle, Brain Parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p

Lillian L. Lee - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • icp monitoring in the rat comparison of monitoring in the ventricle brain parenchyma and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of Neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p<0.001). The intraparenchymal device produced greater cortical damage than the ventricular catheter. In conclusion, ventricular ICP monitoring is the preferred method under these circumstances, since it is accurate and induces least brain damage.

  • ICP Monitoring in the Rat: Comparison of Monitoring in the Ventricle, Brain Parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna
    Journal of neurotrauma, 1999
    Co-Authors: Marike Zwienenberg, Qin-zhi Gong, Lillian L. Lee, Robert F. Berman, Bruce G. Lyeth
    Abstract:

    Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and Cisterna Magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, Cisterna Magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the Cisterna Magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p