The Experts below are selected from a list of 132411 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Joshua P Metlay - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Clinical Decision Making during the covid 19 pandemic
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2021Co-Authors: Joshua P Metlay, Katrina ArmstrongAbstract:The authors apply principles for translating imprecision in diagnostic and therapeutic information into Clinical Decisions to address 3 ongoing areas of uncertainty related to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19. They briefly review the current state of knowledge, highlight the level of uncertainty, and then suggest a pathway forward for Clinical Decision Making during the pandemic.
-
annals Clinical Decision Making avoiding cognitive errors in Clinical Decision Making
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Daniel Restrepo, Katrina Armstrong, Joshua P MetlayAbstract:Diagnostic errors are common and are frequently the result of failures in our cognitive processes. This paper in the Annals Clinical Decision Making series discusses biases that predispose us to th...
-
annals Clinical Decision Making incorporating perspective into Clinical Decisions
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Joshua P Metlay, Katrina ArmstrongAbstract:Increasingly, physicians are required to consider the implications of Clinical Decisions beyond those for the patient. This article in the Annals Clinical Decision Making series provides guidance o...
-
annals Clinical Decision Making translating population evidence to individual patients
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Katrina Armstrong, Joshua P MetlayAbstract:This paper in the Annals Clinical Decision Making series explains a practical approach to evaluating whether the conclusions of studies involving many patients or whole populations may be confident...
-
annals Clinical Decision Making communicating risk and engaging patients in shared Decision Making
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Katrina Armstrong, Joshua P MetlayAbstract:Patients must be involved in weighing risks and benefits when deciding on their care, particularly when uncertainty exists regarding outcomes. This article in the Annals Clinical Decision Making se...
Katrina Armstrong - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Clinical Decision Making during the covid 19 pandemic
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2021Co-Authors: Joshua P Metlay, Katrina ArmstrongAbstract:The authors apply principles for translating imprecision in diagnostic and therapeutic information into Clinical Decisions to address 3 ongoing areas of uncertainty related to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19. They briefly review the current state of knowledge, highlight the level of uncertainty, and then suggest a pathway forward for Clinical Decision Making during the pandemic.
-
annals Clinical Decision Making avoiding cognitive errors in Clinical Decision Making
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Daniel Restrepo, Katrina Armstrong, Joshua P MetlayAbstract:Diagnostic errors are common and are frequently the result of failures in our cognitive processes. This paper in the Annals Clinical Decision Making series discusses biases that predispose us to th...
-
annals Clinical Decision Making incorporating perspective into Clinical Decisions
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Joshua P Metlay, Katrina ArmstrongAbstract:Increasingly, physicians are required to consider the implications of Clinical Decisions beyond those for the patient. This article in the Annals Clinical Decision Making series provides guidance o...
-
annals Clinical Decision Making translating population evidence to individual patients
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Katrina Armstrong, Joshua P MetlayAbstract:This paper in the Annals Clinical Decision Making series explains a practical approach to evaluating whether the conclusions of studies involving many patients or whole populations may be confident...
-
annals Clinical Decision Making communicating risk and engaging patients in shared Decision Making
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Katrina Armstrong, Joshua P MetlayAbstract:Patients must be involved in weighing risks and benefits when deciding on their care, particularly when uncertainty exists regarding outcomes. This article in the Annals Clinical Decision Making se...
Gary A Knutson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
anatomic and functional leg length inequality a review and recommendation for Clinical Decision Making part i anatomic leg length inequality prevalence magnitude effects and Clinical significance
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 2005Co-Authors: Gary A KnutsonAbstract:Background Leg-length inequality is most often divided into two groups: anatomic and functional. Part I of this review analyses data collected on anatomic leg-length inequality relative to prevalence, magnitude, effects and Clinical significance. Part II examines the functional "short leg" including anatomic-functional relationships, and provides an outline for Clinical Decision-Making.
-
anatomic and functional leg length inequality a review and recommendation for Clinical Decision Making part ii the functional or unloaded leg length asymmetry
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 2005Co-Authors: Gary A KnutsonAbstract:Background Part II of this review examines the functional "short leg" or unloaded leg length alignment asymmetry, including the relationship between an anatomic and functional leg-length inequality. Based on the reviewed evidence, an outline for Clinical Decision Making regarding functional and anatomic leg-length inequality will be provided.
James Stephens - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
factors that influence the Clinical Decision Making of novice and experienced physical therapists
Physical Therapy, 2011Co-Authors: Susan Wainwright, Katherine F Shepard, Laurinda B Harman, James StephensAbstract:Background The depth and breadth of prior experience informs Clinical Decision Making in novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians. Objectives The aims of this research were to identify differences in Clinical Decision-Making abilities and processes between novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians and to develop a model of the factors that influence Clinical Decision Making. Design Qualitative research methods and grounded theory were used to gain insight into the factors and experiences that inform Clinical Decision Making. Methods Three participant pairs (each pair consisted of 1 novice physical therapist and 1 experienced physical therapist) were purposively selected from 3 inpatient rehabilitation settings. Case summaries from each participant provided the basis for within- and across-case analyses. The credibility of the results was established through checking of the case summaries by the participants, presentation of low-inference data, and triangulation across multiple data sources and within and across participant groups. Results The factors that influenced Clinical Decision Making were categorized as informative or directive. Novice participants relied more on informative factors, whereas experienced participants were more likely to rely on directive factors. An intermediate effect beyond novice practice was observed. Conclusions The results of this study may be used by educators and employers to develop and structure learning experiences and mentoring opportunities for students and novice learners with the aim of facilitating the development of skills and abilities consistent with expert Clinical Decision Making.
-
novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians a comparison of how reflection is used to inform the Clinical Decision Making process
Physical Therapy, 2010Co-Authors: Susan Wainwright, Katherine F Shepard, Laurinda B Harman, James StephensAbstract:Background Prior experience informs Clinical Decision Making and shapes how reflection is used by novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians. Objectives The aims of this research were: (1) to determine the types and extent of reflection that informs the Clinical Decision-Making process and (2) to compare the use of reflection to direct and assess Clinical Decisions made by novice and experienced physical therapists. Design Qualitative research methods using grounded theory were used to gain insight into how physical therapists use reflection to inform Clinical Decision Making. Methods Three participant pairs (each pair consisting of one novice and one experienced physical therapist) were purposively selected from 3 inpatient rehabilitation settings. Case summaries of each participant provided the basis for within- and across-case analysis. Credibility of these results was established through member check of the case summaries, presentation of low-inference data, and triangulation across multiple data sources and within and across the participant groups. Results Although all participants engaged in reflection-on-action, the experienced participants did so with greater frequency. The experienced participants were distinguished by their use of reflection-in-action and self-assessment during therapist-patient interactions. An intermediate effect beyond novice practice was observed. Conclusions The results of this study may be used by educators and employers to develop and structure learning experiences and mentoring opportunities to facilitate Clinical Decision-Making abilities and the development of the skills necessary for reflection in students and novice practitioners.
Susan Wainwright - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
factors that influence the Clinical Decision Making of novice and experienced physical therapists
Physical Therapy, 2011Co-Authors: Susan Wainwright, Katherine F Shepard, Laurinda B Harman, James StephensAbstract:Background The depth and breadth of prior experience informs Clinical Decision Making in novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians. Objectives The aims of this research were to identify differences in Clinical Decision-Making abilities and processes between novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians and to develop a model of the factors that influence Clinical Decision Making. Design Qualitative research methods and grounded theory were used to gain insight into the factors and experiences that inform Clinical Decision Making. Methods Three participant pairs (each pair consisted of 1 novice physical therapist and 1 experienced physical therapist) were purposively selected from 3 inpatient rehabilitation settings. Case summaries from each participant provided the basis for within- and across-case analyses. The credibility of the results was established through checking of the case summaries by the participants, presentation of low-inference data, and triangulation across multiple data sources and within and across participant groups. Results The factors that influenced Clinical Decision Making were categorized as informative or directive. Novice participants relied more on informative factors, whereas experienced participants were more likely to rely on directive factors. An intermediate effect beyond novice practice was observed. Conclusions The results of this study may be used by educators and employers to develop and structure learning experiences and mentoring opportunities for students and novice learners with the aim of facilitating the development of skills and abilities consistent with expert Clinical Decision Making.
-
novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians a comparison of how reflection is used to inform the Clinical Decision Making process
Physical Therapy, 2010Co-Authors: Susan Wainwright, Katherine F Shepard, Laurinda B Harman, James StephensAbstract:Background Prior experience informs Clinical Decision Making and shapes how reflection is used by novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians. Objectives The aims of this research were: (1) to determine the types and extent of reflection that informs the Clinical Decision-Making process and (2) to compare the use of reflection to direct and assess Clinical Decisions made by novice and experienced physical therapists. Design Qualitative research methods using grounded theory were used to gain insight into how physical therapists use reflection to inform Clinical Decision Making. Methods Three participant pairs (each pair consisting of one novice and one experienced physical therapist) were purposively selected from 3 inpatient rehabilitation settings. Case summaries of each participant provided the basis for within- and across-case analysis. Credibility of these results was established through member check of the case summaries, presentation of low-inference data, and triangulation across multiple data sources and within and across the participant groups. Results Although all participants engaged in reflection-on-action, the experienced participants did so with greater frequency. The experienced participants were distinguished by their use of reflection-in-action and self-assessment during therapist-patient interactions. An intermediate effect beyond novice practice was observed. Conclusions The results of this study may be used by educators and employers to develop and structure learning experiences and mentoring opportunities to facilitate Clinical Decision-Making abilities and the development of the skills necessary for reflection in students and novice practitioners.
