The Experts below are selected from a list of 7707 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Elena Rusconi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Systemizers are better Code-breakers: self-reported systemizing predicts Code-Breaking performance in expert hackers and naïve participants
    Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here, we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders-attention to detail and systemizing-may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e., crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001, 2003). They were also tested with behavioral tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security X-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the X-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.

  • systemizers are better Code breakers self reported systemizing predicts Code Breaking performance in expert hackers and naive participants
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders - attention to detail and systemizing - may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e. crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001; Baron-Cohen et al., 2003). They were also tested with behavioural tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security x-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the x-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.

India Harvey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Systemizers are better Code-breakers: self-reported systemizing predicts Code-Breaking performance in expert hackers and naïve participants
    Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here, we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders-attention to detail and systemizing-may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e., crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001, 2003). They were also tested with behavioral tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security X-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the X-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.

  • systemizers are better Code breakers self reported systemizing predicts Code Breaking performance in expert hackers and naive participants
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders - attention to detail and systemizing - may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e. crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001; Baron-Cohen et al., 2003). They were also tested with behavioural tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security x-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the x-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.

Daniel Mosca - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Systemizers are better Code-breakers: self-reported systemizing predicts Code-Breaking performance in expert hackers and naïve participants
    Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here, we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders-attention to detail and systemizing-may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e., crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001, 2003). They were also tested with behavioral tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security X-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the X-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.

  • systemizers are better Code breakers self reported systemizing predicts Code Breaking performance in expert hackers and naive participants
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders - attention to detail and systemizing - may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e. crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001; Baron-Cohen et al., 2003). They were also tested with behavioural tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security x-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the x-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.

Samuela Bolgan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Systemizers are better Code-breakers: self-reported systemizing predicts Code-Breaking performance in expert hackers and naïve participants
    Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here, we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders-attention to detail and systemizing-may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e., crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001, 2003). They were also tested with behavioral tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security X-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the X-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.

  • systemizers are better Code breakers self reported systemizing predicts Code Breaking performance in expert hackers and naive participants
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders - attention to detail and systemizing - may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e. crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001; Baron-Cohen et al., 2003). They were also tested with behavioural tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security x-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the x-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.

Colin Mclean - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Systemizers are better Code-breakers: self-reported systemizing predicts Code-Breaking performance in expert hackers and naïve participants
    Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here, we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders-attention to detail and systemizing-may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e., crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001, 2003). They were also tested with behavioral tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security X-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the X-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.

  • systemizers are better Code breakers self reported systemizing predicts Code Breaking performance in expert hackers and naive participants
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016
    Co-Authors: India Harvey, Samuela Bolgan, Daniel Mosca, Colin Mclean, Elena Rusconi
    Abstract:

    Studies on hacking have typically focused on motivational aspects and general personality traits of the individuals who engage in hacking; little systematic research has been conducted on predispositions that may be associated not only with the choice to pursue a hacking career but also with performance in either naive or expert populations. Here we test the hypotheses that two traits that are typically enhanced in autism spectrum disorders - attention to detail and systemizing - may be positively related to both the choice of pursuing a career in information security and skilled performance in a prototypical hacking task (i.e. crypto-analysis or Code-Breaking). A group of naive participants and of ethical hackers completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient, including an attention to detail scale, and the Systemizing Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001; Baron-Cohen et al., 2003). They were also tested with behavioural tasks involving Code-Breaking and a control task involving security x-ray image interpretation. Hackers reported significantly higher systemizing and attention to detail than non-hackers. We found a positive relation between self-reported systemizing (but not attention to detail) and Code-Breaking skills in both hackers and non-hackers, whereas attention to detail (but not systemizing) was related with performance in the x-ray screening task in both groups, as previously reported with naive participants (Rusconi et al., 2015). We discuss the theoretical and translational implications of our findings.