The Experts below are selected from a list of 39 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Kim Westbrooks - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
LibGuides: SW 332 - Social Policy and Services: Law
2013Co-Authors: Kim WestbrooksAbstract:A LibGude to help students find information on social welfare policies, programs and services. Code of Laws and Administrative Codes
-
LibGuides: Human Behavior & the Social Environment: Law
2012Co-Authors: Kim WestbrooksAbstract:Provides sources in which to research social systems in the area of families, groups, organizatons, institutions and communities. Code of Laws and Administrative Codes
George C. Jackson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Juvenile Incorrigibility Petitions: Keeping Non Delinquents out of the Juvenile System
2012Co-Authors: George C. JacksonAbstract:This paper explains House Bill H3315 which was introduced to amend section 16-17-420, Code of Laws of South Carolina 1978, relating to the offense of Disturbing Schools.
Liu Chang-chun - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Research on the Expression's Manner of Concept of Criminal Evidence
Journal of The National Procurators College, 2001Co-Authors: Liu Chang-chunAbstract:The current criminal evidence concept expression is shortage.The concept ought to be limited in terms of practice,theory of law,grammar and logic scientifically.The concept must point out the subject who will be authorized to collect criminal evidence.The concept ought to reflect the variety of the evidence's form.The concept must accord with the rule of logic.All item that include the concept of criminal evidence in same Code of Laws of criminal litigation must have same meaning.The criminal evidence of Code of Laws of criminal litigation should consist with the criminal evidence of judicial explanation.
Stoliarovas Andriejus - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sources of Criminal Law of the First Republic of Lithuania. The 1869 Code of Military Laws : reception and novelty
2020Co-Authors: Stoliarovas AndriejusAbstract:The normative acts and various Codes of Laws of pre- Revolutionary Russia are of great interest for historians studying law since they give an opportunity to retrace the development of the legislative basis for different life spheres of the state, for instance, court statutes etc. Therefore, it should be noted that the principal source of the criminal law of the First Republic of Lithuania was the 1869 Code of criminal Laws and its supplements. It was revised, and the imperfections of the 1939 and 1859 Code of Laws were eliminated. The Lithuanian military courts particularly followed volumes No. 22–24 of the 1869 Code of the Criminal Laws, the 1903 Criminal Code of the Russian Empire, other legal regulations that were adjusted to the aspects of the organization and competence of Lithuanian military courts within Lithuanian Laws, constitution and army organization. The Code of Criminal Laws was the principal legal source for the regulations of military courts (such as army court, court martial, regiment court and the officers’ court of honour), the military discipline regulations, the Punitive Code of War in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. The 1869 Code of Criminal Laws was valid until February 1939 in Latvia and until April 6, 1938 in Estonia. In case of Lithuania, this Code was still valid until the first Soviet occupationHumanitarinių mokslų fakultetasVytauto Didžiojo universiteta
P. J. Rhodes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Athenian Code of Laws, 410-399 B.C.
The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1991Co-Authors: P. J. RhodesAbstract:Discussion of the problems must begin with the allegations made in Lysias' speech XXX) Against Nicomachus:When he became writer-up (anagrapheus) of the Laws (nomoi), who does not know how he defiled the city? His instructions were to write up the Laws of Solon in four months, but he set himself up as a lawgiver (nomothetes) in the place of Solon, instead of four months he made his office last six years, and every day he was taking money to insert some Laws and wipe out others. (3) We were brought to this point, that the Laws were doled out to us by his hand, and opposing litigants in the courts would produce conflicting Laws, each claiming to have received them from Nicomachus. When the archons tried to impose fines on him and to bring him to court, he refused to hand over the Laws: the city was brought to the direst disaster before he could be removed from his office and made to submit to examination (euthynai) for what he had done. (4) And yet, gentlemen, after failing to pay the penalty for those offences, he has done the same thing with his present office. First, he has been writing up for four years, when he could have had done with it in thirty days.