The Experts below are selected from a list of 315 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Tomohiro Katada - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Comparison of surgical smoke between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease in the COVID-19 era
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021
    Co-Authors: Hitoshi Kameyama, Tetsuya Otani, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hiroaki Uehara, Rina Harada, Motoharu Hirai, Masaru Komatsu, Akira Kubota, Tomohiro Katada
    Abstract:

    Background Surgical smoke during operation is a well-known health hazard for medical staff. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of surgical smoke during open surgery or laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease. Methods This study quantitated particulate matter (PM) counts as part of surgical smoke in 31 consecutive patients who underwent colectomy at the Niigata City General Hospital using a laser particle counter. Particles were graded by size as ≤ 2.5 μm PM (PM_2.5) or > 2.5 μm PM (large PM). Operative procedures were categorized as either open surgery ( n  = 14) or laparoscopic surgery ( n  = 17). Results The median patient age was 72 (range 41–89) years and 58.1% were male. The total PM_2.5, PM_2.5 per hour, and maximum PM_2.5 per minute counts during operation were significantly higher in open surgery than in laparoscopic surgery ( P  = 0.001, P  

  • Comparison of surgical smoke between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease in the COVID-19 era.
    Surgical endoscopy, 2021
    Co-Authors: Hitoshi Kameyama, Tetsuya Otani, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hiroaki Uehara, Rina Harada, Motoharu Hirai, Masaru Komatsu, Akira Kubota, Tomohiro Katada
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Surgical smoke during operation is a well-known health hazard for medical staff. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of surgical smoke during open surgery or laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease. METHODS: This study quantitated particulate matter (PM) counts as part of surgical smoke in 31 consecutive patients who underwent colectomy at the Niigata City General Hospital using a laser particle counter. Particles were graded by size as ≤ 2.5 µm PM (PM2.5) or > 2.5 µm PM (large PM). Operative procedures were categorized as either open surgery (n = 14) or laparoscopic surgery (n = 17). RESULTS: The median patient age was 72 (range 41-89) years and 58.1% were male. The total PM2.5, PM2.5 per hour, and maximum PM2.5 per minute counts during operation were significantly higher in open surgery than in laparoscopic surgery (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.029, respectively). Large PM counts (total, per hour, and maximum per minute) were also higher in the open surgery group than in the laparoscopic surgery group. The maximum PM2.5 concentration recorded was 38.6 µm/m3, which is considered "unhealthy for sensitive groups" according to the U.S. Environment Protection Agency air quality index standards, if it was a 24-h period mean value. CONCLUSION: Exposure to surgical smoke is lower during laparoscopic surgery than during open surgery for Colorectal Diseases.

Ronan A Cahill - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • advanced laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease notes nose or single port
    Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology, 2014
    Co-Authors: Rishabh Sehgal, Ronan A Cahill
    Abstract:

    Abstract Laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease is an evolving, dynamic subject undergoing constant adaptation. Hence there are significant ongoing advances in technique and technology as has been seen with the emergence of single port and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic operations with already considerable ramifications for many aspects of minimal access surgery. Most recently single port technologies and expertise have synergized with Transanal Endoscopic (TEM/TEO) experience to allow their convergence out of their respective niches so that pelvic surgery can be laparoendoscopically performed from both its abdominal and perineal aspects. Distinct from wound-related benefits, such capacity for high resolution and multi-dimensional imaging relates significant benefit to the operating team and patient. This state of the art review demonstrates the crucial perspective that advanced practices and performance capabilities are intrinsically complimentary rather than competitive. All surgeons need therefore to participate in adapting their practice styles to allow technical step-advance across the discipline.

  • Advanced laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease: NOTES/NOSE or single port?
    Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Rishabh Sehgal, Ronan A Cahill
    Abstract:

    Laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease is an evolving, dynamic subject undergoing constant adaptation. Hence there are significant ongoing advances in technique and technology as has been seen with the emergence of single port and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic operations with already considerable ramifications for many aspects of minimal access surgery. Most recently single port technologies and expertise have synergized with Transanal Endoscopic (TEM/TEO) experience to allow their convergence out of their respective niches so that pelvic surgery can be laparoendoscopically performed from both its abdominal and perineal aspects. Distinct from wound-related benefits, such capacity for high resolution and multi-dimensional imaging relates significant benefit to the operating team and patient. This state of the art review demonstrates the crucial perspective that advanced practices and performance capabilities are intrinsically complimentary rather than competitive. All surgeons need therefore to participate in adapting their practice styles to allow technical step-advance across the discipline.

Hitoshi Kameyama - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Comparison of surgical smoke between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease in the COVID-19 era
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021
    Co-Authors: Hitoshi Kameyama, Tetsuya Otani, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hiroaki Uehara, Rina Harada, Motoharu Hirai, Masaru Komatsu, Akira Kubota, Tomohiro Katada
    Abstract:

    Background Surgical smoke during operation is a well-known health hazard for medical staff. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of surgical smoke during open surgery or laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease. Methods This study quantitated particulate matter (PM) counts as part of surgical smoke in 31 consecutive patients who underwent colectomy at the Niigata City General Hospital using a laser particle counter. Particles were graded by size as ≤ 2.5 μm PM (PM_2.5) or > 2.5 μm PM (large PM). Operative procedures were categorized as either open surgery ( n  = 14) or laparoscopic surgery ( n  = 17). Results The median patient age was 72 (range 41–89) years and 58.1% were male. The total PM_2.5, PM_2.5 per hour, and maximum PM_2.5 per minute counts during operation were significantly higher in open surgery than in laparoscopic surgery ( P  = 0.001, P  

  • Comparison of surgical smoke between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease in the COVID-19 era.
    Surgical endoscopy, 2021
    Co-Authors: Hitoshi Kameyama, Tetsuya Otani, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hiroaki Uehara, Rina Harada, Motoharu Hirai, Masaru Komatsu, Akira Kubota, Tomohiro Katada
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Surgical smoke during operation is a well-known health hazard for medical staff. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of surgical smoke during open surgery or laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease. METHODS: This study quantitated particulate matter (PM) counts as part of surgical smoke in 31 consecutive patients who underwent colectomy at the Niigata City General Hospital using a laser particle counter. Particles were graded by size as ≤ 2.5 µm PM (PM2.5) or > 2.5 µm PM (large PM). Operative procedures were categorized as either open surgery (n = 14) or laparoscopic surgery (n = 17). RESULTS: The median patient age was 72 (range 41-89) years and 58.1% were male. The total PM2.5, PM2.5 per hour, and maximum PM2.5 per minute counts during operation were significantly higher in open surgery than in laparoscopic surgery (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.029, respectively). Large PM counts (total, per hour, and maximum per minute) were also higher in the open surgery group than in the laparoscopic surgery group. The maximum PM2.5 concentration recorded was 38.6 µm/m3, which is considered "unhealthy for sensitive groups" according to the U.S. Environment Protection Agency air quality index standards, if it was a 24-h period mean value. CONCLUSION: Exposure to surgical smoke is lower during laparoscopic surgery than during open surgery for Colorectal Diseases.

Rishabh Sehgal - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • advanced laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease notes nose or single port
    Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology, 2014
    Co-Authors: Rishabh Sehgal, Ronan A Cahill
    Abstract:

    Abstract Laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease is an evolving, dynamic subject undergoing constant adaptation. Hence there are significant ongoing advances in technique and technology as has been seen with the emergence of single port and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic operations with already considerable ramifications for many aspects of minimal access surgery. Most recently single port technologies and expertise have synergized with Transanal Endoscopic (TEM/TEO) experience to allow their convergence out of their respective niches so that pelvic surgery can be laparoendoscopically performed from both its abdominal and perineal aspects. Distinct from wound-related benefits, such capacity for high resolution and multi-dimensional imaging relates significant benefit to the operating team and patient. This state of the art review demonstrates the crucial perspective that advanced practices and performance capabilities are intrinsically complimentary rather than competitive. All surgeons need therefore to participate in adapting their practice styles to allow technical step-advance across the discipline.

  • Advanced laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease: NOTES/NOSE or single port?
    Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Rishabh Sehgal, Ronan A Cahill
    Abstract:

    Laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease is an evolving, dynamic subject undergoing constant adaptation. Hence there are significant ongoing advances in technique and technology as has been seen with the emergence of single port and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic operations with already considerable ramifications for many aspects of minimal access surgery. Most recently single port technologies and expertise have synergized with Transanal Endoscopic (TEM/TEO) experience to allow their convergence out of their respective niches so that pelvic surgery can be laparoendoscopically performed from both its abdominal and perineal aspects. Distinct from wound-related benefits, such capacity for high resolution and multi-dimensional imaging relates significant benefit to the operating team and patient. This state of the art review demonstrates the crucial perspective that advanced practices and performance capabilities are intrinsically complimentary rather than competitive. All surgeons need therefore to participate in adapting their practice styles to allow technical step-advance across the discipline.

Tetsuya Otani - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Comparison of surgical smoke between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease in the COVID-19 era
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021
    Co-Authors: Hitoshi Kameyama, Tetsuya Otani, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hiroaki Uehara, Rina Harada, Motoharu Hirai, Masaru Komatsu, Akira Kubota, Tomohiro Katada
    Abstract:

    Background Surgical smoke during operation is a well-known health hazard for medical staff. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of surgical smoke during open surgery or laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease. Methods This study quantitated particulate matter (PM) counts as part of surgical smoke in 31 consecutive patients who underwent colectomy at the Niigata City General Hospital using a laser particle counter. Particles were graded by size as ≤ 2.5 μm PM (PM_2.5) or > 2.5 μm PM (large PM). Operative procedures were categorized as either open surgery ( n  = 14) or laparoscopic surgery ( n  = 17). Results The median patient age was 72 (range 41–89) years and 58.1% were male. The total PM_2.5, PM_2.5 per hour, and maximum PM_2.5 per minute counts during operation were significantly higher in open surgery than in laparoscopic surgery ( P  = 0.001, P  

  • Comparison of surgical smoke between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease in the COVID-19 era.
    Surgical endoscopy, 2021
    Co-Authors: Hitoshi Kameyama, Tetsuya Otani, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hiroaki Uehara, Rina Harada, Motoharu Hirai, Masaru Komatsu, Akira Kubota, Tomohiro Katada
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Surgical smoke during operation is a well-known health hazard for medical staff. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of surgical smoke during open surgery or laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Disease. METHODS: This study quantitated particulate matter (PM) counts as part of surgical smoke in 31 consecutive patients who underwent colectomy at the Niigata City General Hospital using a laser particle counter. Particles were graded by size as ≤ 2.5 µm PM (PM2.5) or > 2.5 µm PM (large PM). Operative procedures were categorized as either open surgery (n = 14) or laparoscopic surgery (n = 17). RESULTS: The median patient age was 72 (range 41-89) years and 58.1% were male. The total PM2.5, PM2.5 per hour, and maximum PM2.5 per minute counts during operation were significantly higher in open surgery than in laparoscopic surgery (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.029, respectively). Large PM counts (total, per hour, and maximum per minute) were also higher in the open surgery group than in the laparoscopic surgery group. The maximum PM2.5 concentration recorded was 38.6 µm/m3, which is considered "unhealthy for sensitive groups" according to the U.S. Environment Protection Agency air quality index standards, if it was a 24-h period mean value. CONCLUSION: Exposure to surgical smoke is lower during laparoscopic surgery than during open surgery for Colorectal Diseases.