The Experts below are selected from a list of 114933 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Xuan Nguyen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Administration Safety of Blood Products - Lessons Learned from a National Registry for Transfusion and Hemotherapy Practice.
Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas Frietsch, Daffyd Thomas, Michael Schöler, Birgit Fleiter, Martin Schipplick, Michael Spannagl, Ralf Knels, Xuan NguyenAbstract:Background: Compared to blood component safety, the administration of blood may not be as safe as intended. The German Interdisciplinary Task Force for Clinical Hemotherapy (IAKH) specialized registry for administration Errors of blood products was chosen for a detailed analysis of reports. Methods: Voluntarily submitted critical incident reports (n = 138) from 2009 to 2013 were analyzed. Results: Incidents occurred in the operation room (34.1%), in the ICU (25.2%), and in the peripheral ward (18.5%). Procedural steps with Errors were administration to the patient (27.2%), indication and blood order (17.1%), patient identification (17.1%), and blood sample withdrawal and tube labeling (18.0%). Bedside testing (BST) of blood groups avoided Errors in only 2.6%. Associated factors were routine work conditions (66%), Communication Error (36%), emergency case (26%), night or weekend team (39%), untrained personnel (19%). Recommendations addressed process and quality (n = 479) as well as structure quality (n = 314). In 189 instances, an IT solution would have helped to avoid the Error. Conclusions: The administration process is prone to Errors at the patient assessment for the need to transfuse and the application of blood products to patients. BST is only detecting a minority of handling Errors. According to the expert recommendations for practice improvement, the potential to improve transfusion safety by a technical solution is considerable. (C) 2017 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
Nguyen X.d. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Supplementary Material for: Administration Safety of Blood Products - Lessons Learned from a National Registry for Transfusion and Hemotherapy Practice
2017Co-Authors: Frietsch T., Thomas D., Schöler M., Fleiter B., Schipplick M., Spannagl M., Knels R., Nguyen X.d.Abstract:Background: Compared to blood component safety, the administration of blood may not be as safe as intended. The German Interdisciplinary Task Force for Clinical Hemotherapy (IAKH) specialized registry for administration Errors of blood products was chosen for a detailed analysis of reports. Methods: Voluntarily submitted critical incident reports (n = 138) from 2009 to 2013 were analyzed. Results: Incidents occurred in the operation room (34.1%), in the ICU (25.2%), and in the peripheral ward (18.5%). Procedural steps with Errors were administration to the patient (27.2%), indication and blood order (17.1%), patient identification (17.1%), and blood sample withdrawal and tube labeling (18.0%). Bedside testing (BST) of blood groups avoided Errors in only 2.6%. Associated factors were routine work conditions (66%), Communication Error (36%), emergency case (26%), night or weekend team (39%), untrained personnel (19%). Recommendations addressed process and quality (n = 479) as well as structure quality (n = 314). In 189 instances, an IT solution would have helped to avoid the Error. Conclusions: The administration process is prone to Errors at the patient assessment for the need to transfuse and the application of blood products to patients. BST is only detecting a minority of handling Errors. According to the expert recommendations for practice improvement, the potential to improve transfusion safety by a technical solution is considerable.
Pingbo Tang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
automatic Communication Error detection using speech recognition and linguistic analysis for proactive control of loss of separation
Transportation Research Record, 2021Co-Authors: Zhe Sun, Pingbo TangAbstract:Losses of separation (LoS) are breaches of regulations that specify the minimum distance between aircraft in controlled airspace. Erroneous Communications between air traffic controllers (ATCs) and...
Thomas Frietsch - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Administration Safety of Blood Products - Lessons Learned from a National Registry for Transfusion and Hemotherapy Practice.
Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas Frietsch, Daffyd Thomas, Michael Schöler, Birgit Fleiter, Martin Schipplick, Michael Spannagl, Ralf Knels, Xuan NguyenAbstract:Background: Compared to blood component safety, the administration of blood may not be as safe as intended. The German Interdisciplinary Task Force for Clinical Hemotherapy (IAKH) specialized registry for administration Errors of blood products was chosen for a detailed analysis of reports. Methods: Voluntarily submitted critical incident reports (n = 138) from 2009 to 2013 were analyzed. Results: Incidents occurred in the operation room (34.1%), in the ICU (25.2%), and in the peripheral ward (18.5%). Procedural steps with Errors were administration to the patient (27.2%), indication and blood order (17.1%), patient identification (17.1%), and blood sample withdrawal and tube labeling (18.0%). Bedside testing (BST) of blood groups avoided Errors in only 2.6%. Associated factors were routine work conditions (66%), Communication Error (36%), emergency case (26%), night or weekend team (39%), untrained personnel (19%). Recommendations addressed process and quality (n = 479) as well as structure quality (n = 314). In 189 instances, an IT solution would have helped to avoid the Error. Conclusions: The administration process is prone to Errors at the patient assessment for the need to transfuse and the application of blood products to patients. BST is only detecting a minority of handling Errors. According to the expert recommendations for practice improvement, the potential to improve transfusion safety by a technical solution is considerable. (C) 2017 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
Frietsch T. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Supplementary Material for: Administration Safety of Blood Products - Lessons Learned from a National Registry for Transfusion and Hemotherapy Practice
2017Co-Authors: Frietsch T., Thomas D., Schöler M., Fleiter B., Schipplick M., Spannagl M., Knels R., Nguyen X.d.Abstract:Background: Compared to blood component safety, the administration of blood may not be as safe as intended. The German Interdisciplinary Task Force for Clinical Hemotherapy (IAKH) specialized registry for administration Errors of blood products was chosen for a detailed analysis of reports. Methods: Voluntarily submitted critical incident reports (n = 138) from 2009 to 2013 were analyzed. Results: Incidents occurred in the operation room (34.1%), in the ICU (25.2%), and in the peripheral ward (18.5%). Procedural steps with Errors were administration to the patient (27.2%), indication and blood order (17.1%), patient identification (17.1%), and blood sample withdrawal and tube labeling (18.0%). Bedside testing (BST) of blood groups avoided Errors in only 2.6%. Associated factors were routine work conditions (66%), Communication Error (36%), emergency case (26%), night or weekend team (39%), untrained personnel (19%). Recommendations addressed process and quality (n = 479) as well as structure quality (n = 314). In 189 instances, an IT solution would have helped to avoid the Error. Conclusions: The administration process is prone to Errors at the patient assessment for the need to transfuse and the application of blood products to patients. BST is only detecting a minority of handling Errors. According to the expert recommendations for practice improvement, the potential to improve transfusion safety by a technical solution is considerable.