The Experts below are selected from a list of 141 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Anestis Tsegenidis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Under investigation
internal, 2021Co-Authors: Anestis TsegenidisAbstract:and plastic components Supplier for Micro-SLA plastic parts Europac 3D https://europac3d.com/ Prototyping technologies for both metal and plastic components Supplier for HP's Multi Jet Fusion plastic parts Paragon https://www.paragon-rt.com/ Prototyping technologies for both metal and plastic components
-
Current portfolio
internal, 2021Co-Authors: Anestis TsegenidisAbstract:metal and plastic components Supplier for additive manufacturing of metal and plastic parts Stratasys Direct https://www.stratasysdirect.com/ Additive Manufacturing technologies for both metal and plastic components Supplier for additive manufacturing of metal and plastic parts Plunkett
R Wuestenhagen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
control ip s sharing from configurable mechatronic control to autosar sw c package a new model business scenario across automotive oems and Component Supplier and the new roles of sw ip s Supplier and sw ip s integrator
Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2008Co-Authors: S Angellotti, S Monti, W Nesci, A Peciarolo, G Prodi, C Schellino, M Seminara, R WuestenhagenAbstract:The main drivers of today's automotive applications are the reductions of ECU systems cost as well as the development of new innovative functions such as: perceived vehicle performances, active vehicle safety, new emission laws (EU5, EU6) and CO2 reduction. On the other hand more and more resources are spent on adapting the Intellectual Properties (IP's) control solutions to different electronic control unit eroding precious time for the development and validation of the project. To match challenging Time to Market constraints (less than 18 months for a new application) versus Automotive functions complexity increasing, without sacrificing system quality and robustness, a new approach appears unavoidable, perhaps a change of paradigm, where relationships and cooperation between Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEMs) and Suppliers as well as Supplier to Supplier interfacing have to evolve into a new model for both development and commercial issues. This emerging scenario has been taken into account by the AUTOSAR (AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture) consortium defining technologies and process in order to permit to share SW IP's over different platforms and applications. This paper describes, using a real example of a mechatronic scalable control IP's, developed with model based approach technique and configurable on different applications using the AUTOSAR technology, the approach followed by Magneti Marelli (MM) to play the new roles of SW IP's Supplier and SW IP's integrator.
Xiaoping Du - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Partial Safety Factor Method for System Reliability Prediction With Outsourced Components
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 2019Co-Authors: Zhengwei Hu, Xiaoping DuAbstract:System reliability is usually predicted with the assumption that all Component states are independent. This assumption may not accurate for systems with outsourced Components since their states are strongly dependent and Component details may be unknown. The purpose of this study is to develop an accurate system reliability method that can produce complete joint probability density function (PDF) of all the Component states, thereby leading to accurate system reliability predictions. The proposed method works for systems whose failures are caused by excessive loading. In addition to the Component reliability, system designers also ask for partial safety factors for shared loadings from Component Suppliers. The information is then sufficient for building a system-level joint PDF. Algorithms are designed for a Component Supplier to generate partial safety factors. The method enables accurate system reliability predictions without requiring proprietary information from Component Suppliers.
-
A Partial Safety Factor Method for System Reliability Prediction With Outsourced Components
Volume 2B: 44th Design Automation Conference, 2018Co-Authors: Zhengwei Hu, Xiaoping DuAbstract:System reliability is usually predicted with the assumption that all Component states are independent. This assumption is particularly useful for systems with outsourced Components. The assumption, however, may produce large errors in the system reliability prediction since many Component states are strongly dependent. The purpose of this study is to develop an accurate system reliability method that can produce complete joint probability density function (PDF) of all the Component states, thereby leading to accurate system reliability predictions. The proposed method works for systems whose failures are caused by excessive loading. In addition to the Component reliability, system designers also ask for partial safety factors for shared loadings from Component Suppliers. The information is then sufficient for building a system-level joint PDF. Algorithms are designed for a Component Supplier to generate partial safety factors, which enables accurate system reliability predictions without requiring proprietary information from Component Suppliers.
S Angellotti - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
control ip s sharing from configurable mechatronic control to autosar sw c package a new model business scenario across automotive oems and Component Supplier and the new roles of sw ip s Supplier and sw ip s integrator
Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2008Co-Authors: S Angellotti, S Monti, W Nesci, A Peciarolo, G Prodi, C Schellino, M Seminara, R WuestenhagenAbstract:The main drivers of today's automotive applications are the reductions of ECU systems cost as well as the development of new innovative functions such as: perceived vehicle performances, active vehicle safety, new emission laws (EU5, EU6) and CO2 reduction. On the other hand more and more resources are spent on adapting the Intellectual Properties (IP's) control solutions to different electronic control unit eroding precious time for the development and validation of the project. To match challenging Time to Market constraints (less than 18 months for a new application) versus Automotive functions complexity increasing, without sacrificing system quality and robustness, a new approach appears unavoidable, perhaps a change of paradigm, where relationships and cooperation between Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEMs) and Suppliers as well as Supplier to Supplier interfacing have to evolve into a new model for both development and commercial issues. This emerging scenario has been taken into account by the AUTOSAR (AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture) consortium defining technologies and process in order to permit to share SW IP's over different platforms and applications. This paper describes, using a real example of a mechatronic scalable control IP's, developed with model based approach technique and configurable on different applications using the AUTOSAR technology, the approach followed by Magneti Marelli (MM) to play the new roles of SW IP's Supplier and SW IP's integrator.
Ravi Shankar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
collaborative and lean new product development approach a case study in the automotive product design
International Journal of Production Research, 2015Co-Authors: Prashant Tuli, Ravi ShankarAbstract:Collaboration between buyer and the Supplier has been widely studied in the contemporary research to enhance the efficiency of the product development process. Early involvement of stakeholders in development leads to reduced development time and cost and enhanced quality. The current study presents an approach termed as ‘collaborative and lean’ (C&L) approach to new product development (NPD). It involves application of lean principles in a collaborative environment between an automotive Component Supplier and the original equipment manufacturer (OEM). The study compares the deployment of two methodologies of development – generic process and the C&L process for developing the same part by a Supplier for two different OEMs. Development with one OEM was done using generic process and the other using the C&L process. The study uses value stream mapping of the various phases of the development and attempts to understand the application of the proposed approach in the automotive domain. It highlights the pote...