The Experts below are selected from a list of 108 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Benedikt Schmidt - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Journal of Cryptology, 2019Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, John Mitchell, Andre Scedrov, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k -linear groups—and by proving “computational soundness” theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Next, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.
-
CRYPTO (1) - Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2014, 2014Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, Andre Scedrov, John C. Mitchell, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated, methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k-linear groups—and by proving ‘‘computational soundness’’ theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Then, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption, and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.
Gilles Barthe - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Journal of Cryptology, 2019Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, John Mitchell, Andre Scedrov, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k -linear groups—and by proving “computational soundness” theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Next, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.
-
CRYPTO (1) - Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2014, 2014Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, Andre Scedrov, John C. Mitchell, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated, methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k-linear groups—and by proving ‘‘computational soundness’’ theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Then, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption, and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.
Edvard Fagerholm - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Journal of Cryptology, 2019Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, John Mitchell, Andre Scedrov, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k -linear groups—and by proving “computational soundness” theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Next, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.
-
CRYPTO (1) - Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2014, 2014Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, Andre Scedrov, John C. Mitchell, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated, methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k-linear groups—and by proving ‘‘computational soundness’’ theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Then, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption, and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.
Andre Scedrov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Journal of Cryptology, 2019Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, John Mitchell, Andre Scedrov, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k -linear groups—and by proving “computational soundness” theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Next, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.
-
CRYPTO (1) - Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2014, 2014Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, Andre Scedrov, John C. Mitchell, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated, methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k-linear groups—and by proving ‘‘computational soundness’’ theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Then, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption, and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.
Dario Fiore - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Journal of Cryptology, 2019Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, John Mitchell, Andre Scedrov, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k -linear groups—and by proving “computational soundness” theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Next, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.
-
CRYPTO (1) - Automated Analysis of Cryptographic Assumptions in Generic Group Models
Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2014, 2014Co-Authors: Gilles Barthe, Edvard Fagerholm, Dario Fiore, Andre Scedrov, John C. Mitchell, Benedikt SchmidtAbstract:We initiate the study of principled, automated, methods for analyzing hardness assumptions in generic group models, following the approach of symbolic cryptography. We start by defining a broad class of generic and symbolic group models for different settings—symmetric or asymmetric (leveled) k-linear groups—and by proving ‘‘computational soundness’’ theorems for the symbolic models. Based on this result, we formulate a very general master theorem that formally relates the hardness of a (possibly interactive) assumption in these models to solving problems in polynomial algebra. Then, we systematically analyze these problems. We identify different classes of assumptions and obtain decidability and undecidability results. Then, we develop and implement automated procedures for verifying the conditions of master theorems, and thus the validity of hardness assumptions in generic group models. The Concrete Outcome of this work is an automated tool which takes as input the statement of an assumption, and outputs either a proof of its generic hardness or shows an algebraic attack against the assumption.