The Experts below are selected from a list of 324 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

S Watanabe - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Masahiro Inoue - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Consumer Electronics recall support system by search of product user and improvement of recall notice
    International Symposium on Consumer Electronics, 2011
    Co-Authors: Hiroki Miyata, Masahiro Inoue
    Abstract:

    Recently, recall of Consumer Electronics product has increased. Currently, second hand digital Consumer Electronics market in Japan has expanded to several billion yen every year. The second hand market will be expected to expand further in future. This study focuses on the second hand Consumer Electronics market. There are recall problems in a second hand sale or a borrowing. This study proposes recall support system by search of product user and improvement of recall notice. The system automatically process owning product information at a time of transferring and borrowing product. The effectiveness of proposed system was evaluated by comparison of previous studies and a proposed method.

  • Home network system supporting Consumer Electronics recall
    IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2009
    Co-Authors: Hokuto Nawasaki, Hiroyuki Oono, Masahiro Inoue
    Abstract:

    In recent years, Consumer product recall has been increased. Since products are not traced to home, there is no sure method to inform each Consumer of specific recall. We investigate the issue of product recall with Quality Function Deployment and propose a network system which supports Consumer Electronics recalls by connecting recall information servers to a home network system. The system detects the recalled Consumer Electronics, informs Consumer of recall, and controls products for safety.

Ohhoon Kwon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • swap space management technique for portable Consumer Electronics with nand flash memory
    IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2010
    Co-Authors: Ohhoon Kwon
    Abstract:

    Flash memory has more capacity and a lower price. It makes flash memory more suitable for portable Consumer Electronics. Portable Consumer Electronics such as table PC and smart phones use NAND flash memory as a secondary storage because it has many attractive features such as small size, fast access speeds, and light weight. The portable Consumer Electronics with NAND flash memory exploit a "demand paging" to run applications, and also use a "swapping" to extend a limited main memory space. However, if the portable Consumer Electronics use NAND flash memory as swap space, it should perform garbage collection, which is a time-consuming operation. Therefore, in order to manage swap space efficiently, this work presents a novel garbage collection policy for the portable Consumer Electronics with a swap system. The proposed policy has three features important in NAND flash memory based swap systems: (1) long endurance of NAND flash memory, (2) quick garbage collection, and (3) low energy consumption.

Otto Andersen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Life cycle assessments of Consumer Electronics — are they consistent?
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010
    Co-Authors: Anders S. G. Andrae, Otto Andersen
    Abstract:

    Background, aim, and scope During the last decades, the Electronics industry has undergone tremendous changes due to intense research leading to advanced technology development. Multiple life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have been performed on the environmental implications of Consumer Electronics. The aim of this review is to assess the consistency between different LCA studies for desktop computers, laptop computers, mobile phones and televisions (TVs). Materials and methods A literature study was conducted covering some key LCA contributions to the Consumer Electronics field. The focus is primarily on global warming potential during 100 years (GWP100) efficiency in different life cycle phases and secondarily on primary energy usage/electricity usages which are normalised per year to find inconsistencies. Results The life cycle impact assessment GWP100 results for Consumer Electronics over the years suggest that most studies are of comparable quality; however, some studies are neither coherent nor transparent. Published LCAs for mobile phone and TV sets are consistent, whereas for laptop and desktop computers, the studies occasionally give conflicting messages. Discussion The inconsistencies appear to be rooted in subjective choices and different system boundaries and lifetime, rather than lack of standardisation. If included, the amounts of emissions of sulphur hexafluoride (SF_6) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF_3) are crucial to the GWP100 in the various life cycle phases for a desktop using liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. Another important observation is that the MEEuP methodology report/tool underestimates the GWP100 of electronic component manufacturing processes. Conclusions Between 1997 and 2010, the ISO 14040/44 standards have ensured a rather consistent set of GWP100 results for the studied products. However, the lack of transparency for Consumer Electronics LCAs sometimes makes benchmarking difficult. It is nevertheless possible to compare new LCA calculations to existing studies. It is also possible to reveal which product studies are consistent with studies of submaterials and subcomponents. In most cases, the GWP100 results for Consumer Electronics are consistent. Based on the survey of published work, recycling and other end-of-life processes have a tiny share of the total GWP100 score for Consumer Electronics. Recommendations and perspectives LCA researchers should as a rule, if possible, make a historical survey of their technical system to establish trends, proportions and relations. Policy makers ought to ask for these surveys when using LCAs for decision support. This charter is necessary as to understand the reasonableness of the results. Additions to the ISO14040/44 LCA standardisation for mass–volume products would be worthwhile as a means of increasing the consistency.

  • Life cycle assessments of Consumer Electronics — are they consistent?
    International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010
    Co-Authors: Anders S. G. Andrae, Otto Andersen
    Abstract:

    During the last decades, the Electronics industry has undergone tremendous changes due to intense research leading to advanced technology development. Multiple life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have been performed on the environmental implications of Consumer Electronics. The aim of this review is to assess the consistency between different LCA studies for desktop computers, laptop computers, mobile phones and televisions (TVs). A literature study was conducted covering some key LCA contributions to the Consumer Electronics field. The focus is primarily on global warming potential during 100 years (GWP100) efficiency in different life cycle phases and secondarily on primary energy usage/electricity usages which are normalised per year to find inconsistencies. The life cycle impact assessment GWP100 results for Consumer Electronics over the years suggest that most studies are of comparable quality; however, some studies are neither coherent nor transparent. Published LCAs for mobile phone and TV sets are consistent, whereas for laptop and desktop computers, the studies occasionally give conflicting messages. The inconsistencies appear to be rooted in subjective choices and different system boundaries and lifetime, rather than lack of standardisation. If included, the amounts of emissions of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) are crucial to the GWP100 in the various life cycle phases for a desktop using liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. Another important observation is that the MEEuP methodology report/tool underestimates the GWP100 of electronic component manufacturing processes. Between 1997 and 2010, the ISO 14040/44 standards have ensured a rather consistent set of GWP100 results for the studied products. However, the lack of transparency for Consumer Electronics LCAs sometimes makes benchmarking difficult. It is nevertheless possible to compare new LCA calculations to existing studies. It is also possible to reveal which product studies are consistent with studies of submaterials and subcomponents. In most cases, the GWP100 results for Consumer Electronics are consistent. Based on the survey of published work, recycling and other end-of-life processes have a tiny share of the total GWP100 score for Consumer Electronics. LCA researchers should as a rule, if possible, make a historical survey of their technical system to establish trends, proportions and relations. Policy makers ought to ask for these surveys when using LCAs for decision support. This charter is necessary as to understand the reasonableness of the results. Additions to the ISO14040/44 LCA standardisation for mass–volume products would be worthwhile as a means of increasing the consistency.

  • life cycle assessments of Consumer Electronics are they consistent
    International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010
    Co-Authors: Anders S. G. Andrae, Otto Andersen
    Abstract:

    During the last decades, the Electronics industry has undergone tremendous changes due to intense research leading to advanced technology development. Multiple life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have been performed on the environmental implications of Consumer Electronics. The aim of this review is to assess the consistency between different LCA studies for desktop computers, laptop computers, mobile phones and televisions (TVs). A literature study was conducted covering some key LCA contributions to the Consumer Electronics field. The focus is primarily on global warming potential during 100 years (GWP100) efficiency in different life cycle phases and secondarily on primary energy usage/electricity usages which are normalised per year to find inconsistencies. The life cycle impact assessment GWP100 results for Consumer Electronics over the years suggest that most studies are of comparable quality; however, some studies are neither coherent nor transparent. Published LCAs for mobile phone and TV sets are consistent, whereas for laptop and desktop computers, the studies occasionally give conflicting messages. The inconsistencies appear to be rooted in subjective choices and different system boundaries and lifetime, rather than lack of standardisation. If included, the amounts of emissions of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) are crucial to the GWP100 in the various life cycle phases for a desktop using liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. Another important observation is that the MEEuP methodology report/tool underestimates the GWP100 of electronic component manufacturing processes. Between 1997 and 2010, the ISO 14040/44 standards have ensured a rather consistent set of GWP100 results for the studied products. However, the lack of transparency for Consumer Electronics LCAs sometimes makes benchmarking difficult. It is nevertheless possible to compare new LCA calculations to existing studies. It is also possible to reveal which product studies are consistent with studies of submaterials and subcomponents. In most cases, the GWP100 results for Consumer Electronics are consistent. Based on the survey of published work, recycling and other end-of-life processes have a tiny share of the total GWP100 score for Consumer Electronics. LCA researchers should as a rule, if possible, make a historical survey of their technical system to establish trends, proportions and relations. Policy makers ought to ask for these surveys when using LCAs for decision support. This charter is necessary as to understand the reasonableness of the results. Additions to the ISO14040/44 LCA standardisation for mass–volume products would be worthwhile as a means of increasing the consistency.

J.c. Tracy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • of Consumer Electronics into Motor Vehicles
    2010
    Co-Authors: J.c. Tracy
    Abstract:

    Trends in Consumer e1ec:tronics greatly influence the electronic content of the automobile. This report will focus on entertainment and communications systems, people as sensory input:/out devices, and key technologies that will enable Consumer Electronics to be integrated into the vehicle. Vehicle Electronics in the ’80’s concentrated on the electronic control, management, and integration of mechanical subsystems. The explosive growth in engine :ontrols, anti-lock brakes I(ABS), and transmission management systems makes that emphasis understandable :ven as the industry perspective shifts. Given the pace of change in technology and automotive Electronics, it is difficult to comprehend the character of ‘he vehicle of the year 2010. Elut it is likely that the next {seneration automobile will be laden with Consumer Electronics.