The Experts below are selected from a list of 73926 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Megan Simons - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
measuring the impact of burn scarring on health related quality of life development and preliminary Content Validation of the brisbane burn scar impact profile bbsip for children and adults
Burns, 2015Co-Authors: Zephanie Tyack, Jenny Ziviani, Roy M Kimble, Anita Plaza, Amber Jones, Leila Cuttle, Megan SimonsAbstract:Abstract Introduction No burn-scar specific, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure exists. This study aimed to develop a patient-reported, evaluative HRQOL measure to assess the impact of burn scarring in children and adults. Method Semi-structured interviews, Content Validation surveys, and cognitive interviews were used to develop and test Content validity of a new measure – the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP). Results Participants comprised Australian adults ( n =23) and children ( n =19) with burn scarring; caregivers of children with burn scarring ( n =28); and international scar management experts ( n =14). Items distinct from other burn scar measures emerged. Four versions of the BBSIP were developed; one for children aged 8–18 years, one for adults, one for caregivers (as proxies for children aged less than 8-years), and one for caregivers of children aged 8–18 years. Preliminary Content validity of the BBSIP was supported. Final items covered physical and sensory symptoms; emotional reactions; impact on social functioning and daily activities; impact of treatment; and environmental factors. Conclusion The BBSIP was developed to assess burn-scar specific HRQOL and will be available at http://www.coolburns.com.au under a creative commons license. Further testing is underway.
Roy M Kimble - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
measuring the impact of burn scarring on health related quality of life development and preliminary Content Validation of the brisbane burn scar impact profile bbsip for children and adults
Burns, 2015Co-Authors: Zephanie Tyack, Jenny Ziviani, Roy M Kimble, Anita Plaza, Amber Jones, Leila Cuttle, Megan SimonsAbstract:Abstract Introduction No burn-scar specific, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure exists. This study aimed to develop a patient-reported, evaluative HRQOL measure to assess the impact of burn scarring in children and adults. Method Semi-structured interviews, Content Validation surveys, and cognitive interviews were used to develop and test Content validity of a new measure – the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP). Results Participants comprised Australian adults ( n =23) and children ( n =19) with burn scarring; caregivers of children with burn scarring ( n =28); and international scar management experts ( n =14). Items distinct from other burn scar measures emerged. Four versions of the BBSIP were developed; one for children aged 8–18 years, one for adults, one for caregivers (as proxies for children aged less than 8-years), and one for caregivers of children aged 8–18 years. Preliminary Content validity of the BBSIP was supported. Final items covered physical and sensory symptoms; emotional reactions; impact on social functioning and daily activities; impact of treatment; and environmental factors. Conclusion The BBSIP was developed to assess burn-scar specific HRQOL and will be available at http://www.coolburns.com.au under a creative commons license. Further testing is underway.
Patrick J Murphy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
development and Content Validation of a hyperdimensional taxonomy of managerial competence
Human Performance, 2000Co-Authors: Robert P Tett, Hal A Guterman, Angela Bleier, Patrick J MurphyAbstract:In light of repeated prescriptions for theory-driven prediction of job performance (Guion & Gottier, 1965; Tett, Jackson, Rothstein, & Reddon, 1999), the complexity of the manager's role calls for a comprehensive performance taxonomy more detailed than those offered previously. Review of recent discussion of the fidelity-bandwidth tradeoff (e.g., Hogan & Roberts, 1996; Ones & Viswesvaran, 1996) and the need for greater articulation of job performance (Campbell, 1994; Murphy & Shiarella, 1997) raise important issues regarding construct specificity in considering managerial behavior. None of 12 earlier managerial performance taxonomies (e.g., Borman & Brush, 1993; Tornow & Pinto, 1976; Yukl & Lepsinger, 1992) offers adequate specificity for meeting key research challenges. A "hyperdimensional" taxonomy of managerial competencies, derived from the earlier models and developed using unique methods, was subjected to Content Validation by expert review in 3 studies. In the first 2, a total of 110 Academy of Man...
-
Development and Content Validation of a Hyperdimensional Taxonomy of Managerial Competence
Human Performance, 2000Co-Authors: Robert P Tett, Hal A Guterman, Angela Bleier, Patrick J MurphyAbstract:In light of repeated prescriptions for theory-driven prediction of job performance (Guion & Gottier, 1965; Tett, Jackson, Rothstein & Reddon, 1999), the complexity of the manager's role calls for a comprehensive performance taxonomy more detailed than those offered previously. Review of recent discussion of the fidelity - bandwidth tradeoff (e.g., Hogan & Roberts, 1996; Ones & Viswesvaran, 1996) and the need for greater articulation of job performance (Campbell, 1994; Murphy & Shiarella, 1997) raise important issues regarding construct specificity in considering managerial behavior. None of 12 earlier managerial performance taxonomies (e.g., Borman & Brush, 1993; Tornow & Pinto, 1976; Yukl & Lepsinger, 1992) offers adequate specificity for meeting key research challenges. A "hyperdimensional" taxonomy of managerial competencies, derived from the earlier models and developed using unique methods, was subjected to Content Validation by expert review in 3 studies. In the first 2, a total of 110 Academy of Management members sorted 141 behavioral elements into 47 competencies with average hit rates of 68% and 85%, respectively. Results directed model refinements, including addition of 6 competencies. In Study 3, 118 subject matter experts sorted behaviors into targeted competencies in a more rigorous task with an average hit rate of 88.5%. Findings support the model's Content validity, its continued development, and most importantly, the pursuit of specificity in understanding and predicting managerial behavior.
Bronwynne C. Evans - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Content Validation of instruments: are the perspectives of Anglo reviewers different from those of Hispanic/Latino and American Indian reviewers?
The Journal of nursing education, 2005Co-Authors: Bronwynne C. EvansAbstract:This article reports on the Content Validation of eight quantitative instruments developed to evaluate the interventions and outcomes for a Nursing Workforce Diversity Grant. During the expert review phase of the Content Validation process, response patterns to certain instrument items differed, effectively separating the reviewers into two groups. The response patterns of the Hispanic/Latino and American Indian experts were aligned with one another. The responses of the Anglo reviewers were also aligned with one another but not with the responses of the other group, which evaluated as highly relevant instrument items that were organized around five themes: the Importance of a Personal Relationship with Students of Color; the Effect of Isolation from Home and Family; the Importance of Culture and Ethnicity in Personal Identity; the Need for Collaborative, Interactive Learning and a Curriculum of Inclusion; and the Presence of Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism.
-
Cultural and ethnic differences in Content Validation responses
Western journal of nursing research, 2004Co-Authors: Bronwynne C. EvansAbstract:Eight instruments to evaluate grant interventions aimed at increasing recruitment and retention of Hispanic/Latino and American Indian nurses were developed for a Nursing Workforce Diversity Grant. This article compares expert reviewer responses during Content Validation of these instruments with (a) current literature and (b) seven filmed intervals of Hispanic/Latino and American Indian nurses speaking about their educational experiences. White reviewers responded differently to certain items than did Hispanic/Latino and American Indian reviewers (or reviewers closely affiliated with such persons). Responses of Hispanic/Latino and American Indian experts were aligned with one another but not aligned with the responses of White experts, who also agreed with one another, prompting literature and film comparisons with their responses. Faculty development may be needed to help teachers uncover their assumptions about students of color, acquire knowledge about cultural perspectives, recognize institutional racism, and attain the skills necessary to develop and implement a curriculum of inclusion.
Robert P Tett - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
development and Content Validation of a hyperdimensional taxonomy of managerial competence
Human Performance, 2000Co-Authors: Robert P Tett, Hal A Guterman, Angela Bleier, Patrick J MurphyAbstract:In light of repeated prescriptions for theory-driven prediction of job performance (Guion & Gottier, 1965; Tett, Jackson, Rothstein, & Reddon, 1999), the complexity of the manager's role calls for a comprehensive performance taxonomy more detailed than those offered previously. Review of recent discussion of the fidelity-bandwidth tradeoff (e.g., Hogan & Roberts, 1996; Ones & Viswesvaran, 1996) and the need for greater articulation of job performance (Campbell, 1994; Murphy & Shiarella, 1997) raise important issues regarding construct specificity in considering managerial behavior. None of 12 earlier managerial performance taxonomies (e.g., Borman & Brush, 1993; Tornow & Pinto, 1976; Yukl & Lepsinger, 1992) offers adequate specificity for meeting key research challenges. A "hyperdimensional" taxonomy of managerial competencies, derived from the earlier models and developed using unique methods, was subjected to Content Validation by expert review in 3 studies. In the first 2, a total of 110 Academy of Man...
-
Development and Content Validation of a Hyperdimensional Taxonomy of Managerial Competence
Human Performance, 2000Co-Authors: Robert P Tett, Hal A Guterman, Angela Bleier, Patrick J MurphyAbstract:In light of repeated prescriptions for theory-driven prediction of job performance (Guion & Gottier, 1965; Tett, Jackson, Rothstein & Reddon, 1999), the complexity of the manager's role calls for a comprehensive performance taxonomy more detailed than those offered previously. Review of recent discussion of the fidelity - bandwidth tradeoff (e.g., Hogan & Roberts, 1996; Ones & Viswesvaran, 1996) and the need for greater articulation of job performance (Campbell, 1994; Murphy & Shiarella, 1997) raise important issues regarding construct specificity in considering managerial behavior. None of 12 earlier managerial performance taxonomies (e.g., Borman & Brush, 1993; Tornow & Pinto, 1976; Yukl & Lepsinger, 1992) offers adequate specificity for meeting key research challenges. A "hyperdimensional" taxonomy of managerial competencies, derived from the earlier models and developed using unique methods, was subjected to Content Validation by expert review in 3 studies. In the first 2, a total of 110 Academy of Management members sorted 141 behavioral elements into 47 competencies with average hit rates of 68% and 85%, respectively. Results directed model refinements, including addition of 6 competencies. In Study 3, 118 subject matter experts sorted behaviors into targeted competencies in a more rigorous task with an average hit rate of 88.5%. Findings support the model's Content validity, its continued development, and most importantly, the pursuit of specificity in understanding and predicting managerial behavior.