The Experts below are selected from a list of 1260 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Ohio. Department Of Administrative Services. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Other title: Contingency Planning Policy 2100-16
Ohio Department of Administrative Services, 2020Co-Authors: Ohio. Department Of Administrative Services.Abstract:[Revised]; At head of title: DAS Policy; "Effective date: 06/10/2020."; Policy number: 2100-16; "Revision history: 2/8/2018, Original Policy; 12/21/2018, Revised the Policy to clarify information system backup requirements; 06/10/2020, Updated the Policy template. Added requirements related to DAS Policy 200-14, 'Teleworking'..."--Page 8; Includes bibliographical referencesThe purpose of this Policy is to provide Contingency Planning (CP) requirements to minimize the disruption to critical business functions in the event of an information technology (IT) system disruption, compromise, or failure, while maintaining the security safeguards originally planned and implemented for systems. To ensure this occurs, this Policy establishes requirements that address Contingency Planning controls that align with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-53, "Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations," (CP family of controls). A glossary of terms found in this Policy is located in Section 8.0. In addition, references to NIST SP 800-53 family identifiers and control numbers are provided in parentheticals next to requirement headers, where applicable. The scope of this Policy includes any Department of Administrative Services (DAS)- managed information system or service, as well as services provided by external service providers on behalf of DAS. This Policy also applies to DAS business, data, and system/service owner
-
Other title: Contingency Planning Policy 2100-16
2018Co-Authors: Ohio. Department Of Administrative Services.Abstract:"Original Policy"--Page 7.; "Effective date: 2/8/2018."; Policy number: 2100-16.; Includes bibliographical references.The purpose of this Policy is to provide Contingency Planning (CP) requirements to minimize the disruption to critical business functions in the event of an information technology (IT) system disruption, compromise, or failure, while maintaining the security safeguards originally planned and implemented for systems. To ensure this occurs, this Policy establishes requirements that address Contingency Planning controls that align with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-53, "Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations," (CP family of controls). A glossary of terms found in this Policy is located in Section 8.0. In addition, references to NIST SP 800-53 family identifiers and control numbers are provided in parentheticals next to requirement headers, where applicable. The scope of this Policy includes any Department of Administrative Services (DAS)- managed information system or service, as well as services provided by external service providers on behalf of DAS. This Policy also applies to DAS business, data, and system/service owners
Br Barus, Catrinadia Christie - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Disaster communication uses field training exercise simulation as an important aspect of disaster risk reduction
'Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press)', 2020Co-Authors: Lestari Puji, Ritonga Rajab, Ruliana Poppy, Br Barus, Catrinadia ChristieAbstract:Karo Regency, North Sumatra is an area prone to the eruption of Mount Sinabung that does not yet have a Contingency Planning Policy. This research aims to find the communication model of the Mount Sinabung eruption disaster through a field training exercise simulation to test the Contingency Plan document before becoming Policy. The method used is descriptive qualitative, with the object of research is the communication of Mount Sinabung eruption disaster. The research subjects were the Head of Sinabung Observation Post, the Head of BPBD, the Assistant Regent, the head of the Office of Communication and Information, journalists, victims, and volunteers. Data collection techniques carried out by in-depth interviews, observation, documentation, Focus Group Discussion, and field training exercise simulation. The data analysis technique was carried out qualitatively before simulation, during simulation, and after simulation. The results of the study were to find a communication model of the Mount Sinabung eruption disaster through a field training exercise simulation. This research contributes in the form of: (1) a new communication model in the process of reducing the risk of the eruption of Mount Sinabung through a field training exercise simulation which is considered effective in improving disaster-resilient communities; (2) new methods in disaster communication research, namely using data collection techniques through field training exercise simulation; and (3) The new Karo Regent Regulation Number 08/2020. This finding can be adopted for reducing the risk of other volcanic disasters
Jawatankuasa Kerja Psm Ukm - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Disaster communication uses field training exercise simulation as an important aspect of disaster risk reduction Disaster communication uses field training exercise simulation as an important aspect of disaster risk reduction
Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 2020Co-Authors: Jawatankuasa Kerja Psm UkmAbstract:Karo Regency, North Sumatra is an area prone to the eruption of Mount Sinabung that does not yet have a Contingency Planning Policy. This research aims to find the communication model of the Mount Sinabung eruption disaster through a field training exercise simulation to test the Contingency Plan document before becoming Policy. The method used is descriptive qualitative, with the object of research is the communication of Mount Sinabung eruption disaster. The research subjects were the Head of Sinabung Observation Post, the Head of BPBD, the Assistant Regent, the head of the Office of Communication and Information, journalists, victims, and volunteers. Data collection techniques carried out by in-depth interviews, observation, documentation, Focus Group Discussion, and field training exercise simulation. The data analysis technique was carried out qualitatively before simulation, during simulation, and after simulation. The results of the study were to find a communication model of the Mount Sinabung eruption disaster through a field training exercise simulation. This research contributes in the form of: (1) a new communication model in the process of reducing the risk of the eruption of Mount Sinabung through a field training exercise simulation which is considered effective in improving disaster-resilient communities(2) new methods in disaster communication research, namely using data collection techniques through field training exercise simulationand (3) The new Karo Regent Regulation Number 08/2020. This finding can be adopted for reducing the risk of other volcanic disasters
Keith R. Pursall - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
IMPLEMENTING A Contingency Planning Policy
Computer Risk Manager, 1992Co-Authors: Keith R. PursallAbstract:This chapter provides an overview on implementing a Contingency Planning Policy. Once a Contingency plan has been developed, tested, and implemented, then come the problems of ensuring management adheres to the commitment shown during its development. This requires continuing support in terms of time, personnel and money to a project which will be competing with others for the same limited resources. If all the effort expended during the development of the plan is not to be wasted, then it is essential that this continuing support is given. As a guide. there follows a number of checklists of ideas, questions, and points to consider for the Contingency planner. The lists are by no means exhaustive but can be used as a starting point for those wishing to draw up their own. This lists briefs about preparing for a change, updating alternative facilities, continuing to test, monitoring the plan, and responding to emergencies.
Lestari Puji - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Disaster communication uses field training exercise simulation as an important aspect of disaster risk reduction
'Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press)', 2020Co-Authors: Lestari Puji, Ritonga Rajab, Ruliana Poppy, Br Barus, Catrinadia ChristieAbstract:Karo Regency, North Sumatra is an area prone to the eruption of Mount Sinabung that does not yet have a Contingency Planning Policy. This research aims to find the communication model of the Mount Sinabung eruption disaster through a field training exercise simulation to test the Contingency Plan document before becoming Policy. The method used is descriptive qualitative, with the object of research is the communication of Mount Sinabung eruption disaster. The research subjects were the Head of Sinabung Observation Post, the Head of BPBD, the Assistant Regent, the head of the Office of Communication and Information, journalists, victims, and volunteers. Data collection techniques carried out by in-depth interviews, observation, documentation, Focus Group Discussion, and field training exercise simulation. The data analysis technique was carried out qualitatively before simulation, during simulation, and after simulation. The results of the study were to find a communication model of the Mount Sinabung eruption disaster through a field training exercise simulation. This research contributes in the form of: (1) a new communication model in the process of reducing the risk of the eruption of Mount Sinabung through a field training exercise simulation which is considered effective in improving disaster-resilient communities; (2) new methods in disaster communication research, namely using data collection techniques through field training exercise simulation; and (3) The new Karo Regent Regulation Number 08/2020. This finding can be adopted for reducing the risk of other volcanic disasters