The Experts below are selected from a list of 123924 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Robert Kane - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the relationship between magical thinking inferential confusion and obsessive compulsive symptoms
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2014Co-Authors: Naomi Goods, Sarah J Egan, Clare S Rees, Robert KaneAbstract:Inferential confusion is an under-researched faulty reasoning process in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Based on an overreliance on imagined possibilities, it shares similarities with the extensively researched construct of thought–action fusion (TAF). While TAF has been proposed as a specific subset of the broader construct of magical thinking, the relationship between inferential confusion and magical thinking is unexplored. The present study investigated this relationship, and hypothesised that magical thinking would partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. A non-clinical sample of 201 participants (M = 34.94, SD = 15.88) were recruited via Convenience Sampling. Regression analyses found the hypothesised mediating relationship was supported, as magical thinking did partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and OC symptoms. Interestingly, inferential confusion had the stronger relationship with OC symptoms in compari...
-
The Relationship Between Magical Thinking, Inferential Confusion and Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2014Co-Authors: Naomi Goods, Sarah J Egan, Clare S Rees, Robert KaneAbstract:Inferential confusion is an under-researched faulty reasoning process in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Based on an overreliance on imagined possibilities, it shares similarities with the extensively researched construct of thought–action fusion (TAF). While TAF has been proposed as a specific subset of the broader construct of magical thinking, the relationship between inferential confusion and magical thinking is unexplored. The present study investigated this relationship, and hypothesised that magical thinking would partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. A non-clinical sample of 201 participants (M = 34.94, SD = 15.88) were recruited via Convenience Sampling. Regression analyses found the hypothesised mediating relationship was supported, as magical thinking did partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and OC symptoms. Interestingly, inferential confusion had the stronger relationship with OC symptoms in compari...
Naomi Goods - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the relationship between magical thinking inferential confusion and obsessive compulsive symptoms
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2014Co-Authors: Naomi Goods, Sarah J Egan, Clare S Rees, Robert KaneAbstract:Inferential confusion is an under-researched faulty reasoning process in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Based on an overreliance on imagined possibilities, it shares similarities with the extensively researched construct of thought–action fusion (TAF). While TAF has been proposed as a specific subset of the broader construct of magical thinking, the relationship between inferential confusion and magical thinking is unexplored. The present study investigated this relationship, and hypothesised that magical thinking would partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. A non-clinical sample of 201 participants (M = 34.94, SD = 15.88) were recruited via Convenience Sampling. Regression analyses found the hypothesised mediating relationship was supported, as magical thinking did partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and OC symptoms. Interestingly, inferential confusion had the stronger relationship with OC symptoms in compari...
-
The Relationship Between Magical Thinking, Inferential Confusion and Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2014Co-Authors: Naomi Goods, Sarah J Egan, Clare S Rees, Robert KaneAbstract:Inferential confusion is an under-researched faulty reasoning process in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Based on an overreliance on imagined possibilities, it shares similarities with the extensively researched construct of thought–action fusion (TAF). While TAF has been proposed as a specific subset of the broader construct of magical thinking, the relationship between inferential confusion and magical thinking is unexplored. The present study investigated this relationship, and hypothesised that magical thinking would partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. A non-clinical sample of 201 participants (M = 34.94, SD = 15.88) were recruited via Convenience Sampling. Regression analyses found the hypothesised mediating relationship was supported, as magical thinking did partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and OC symptoms. Interestingly, inferential confusion had the stronger relationship with OC symptoms in compari...
Seyhun Topbas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
public attitudes toward stuttering in turkey probability versus Convenience Sampling
Journal of Fluency Disorders, 2011Co-Authors: Sertan R Ozdemir, Kenneth O St Louis, Seyhun TopbasAbstract:Abstract Purpose: A Turkish translation of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering ( POSHA-S ) was used to compare probability versus Convenience Sampling to measure public attitudes toward stuttering. Method: A Convenience sample of adults in Eskisehir, Turkey was compared with two replicates of a school-based, probability cluster Sampling scheme. Results : The two replicates of the probability Sampling scheme yielded similar demographic samples, both of which were different from the Convenience sample. Components of subscores on the POSHA-S were significantly different in more than half of the comparisons between Convenience and probability samples, indicating important differences in public attitudes. Conclusions . If POSHA-S users intend to generalize to specific geographic areas, results of this study indicate that probability Sampling is a better research strategy than Convenience Sampling. Educational objectives: The reader will be able to: (1) discuss the difference between Convenience Sampling and probability Sampling; (2) describe a school-based probability Sampling scheme; and (3) describe differences in POSHA - S results from Convenience Sampling versus probability Sampling.
Sarah J Egan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the relationship between magical thinking inferential confusion and obsessive compulsive symptoms
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2014Co-Authors: Naomi Goods, Sarah J Egan, Clare S Rees, Robert KaneAbstract:Inferential confusion is an under-researched faulty reasoning process in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Based on an overreliance on imagined possibilities, it shares similarities with the extensively researched construct of thought–action fusion (TAF). While TAF has been proposed as a specific subset of the broader construct of magical thinking, the relationship between inferential confusion and magical thinking is unexplored. The present study investigated this relationship, and hypothesised that magical thinking would partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. A non-clinical sample of 201 participants (M = 34.94, SD = 15.88) were recruited via Convenience Sampling. Regression analyses found the hypothesised mediating relationship was supported, as magical thinking did partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and OC symptoms. Interestingly, inferential confusion had the stronger relationship with OC symptoms in compari...
-
The Relationship Between Magical Thinking, Inferential Confusion and Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2014Co-Authors: Naomi Goods, Sarah J Egan, Clare S Rees, Robert KaneAbstract:Inferential confusion is an under-researched faulty reasoning process in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Based on an overreliance on imagined possibilities, it shares similarities with the extensively researched construct of thought–action fusion (TAF). While TAF has been proposed as a specific subset of the broader construct of magical thinking, the relationship between inferential confusion and magical thinking is unexplored. The present study investigated this relationship, and hypothesised that magical thinking would partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. A non-clinical sample of 201 participants (M = 34.94, SD = 15.88) were recruited via Convenience Sampling. Regression analyses found the hypothesised mediating relationship was supported, as magical thinking did partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and OC symptoms. Interestingly, inferential confusion had the stronger relationship with OC symptoms in compari...
Clare S Rees - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the relationship between magical thinking inferential confusion and obsessive compulsive symptoms
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2014Co-Authors: Naomi Goods, Sarah J Egan, Clare S Rees, Robert KaneAbstract:Inferential confusion is an under-researched faulty reasoning process in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Based on an overreliance on imagined possibilities, it shares similarities with the extensively researched construct of thought–action fusion (TAF). While TAF has been proposed as a specific subset of the broader construct of magical thinking, the relationship between inferential confusion and magical thinking is unexplored. The present study investigated this relationship, and hypothesised that magical thinking would partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. A non-clinical sample of 201 participants (M = 34.94, SD = 15.88) were recruited via Convenience Sampling. Regression analyses found the hypothesised mediating relationship was supported, as magical thinking did partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and OC symptoms. Interestingly, inferential confusion had the stronger relationship with OC symptoms in compari...
-
The Relationship Between Magical Thinking, Inferential Confusion and Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2014Co-Authors: Naomi Goods, Sarah J Egan, Clare S Rees, Robert KaneAbstract:Inferential confusion is an under-researched faulty reasoning process in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Based on an overreliance on imagined possibilities, it shares similarities with the extensively researched construct of thought–action fusion (TAF). While TAF has been proposed as a specific subset of the broader construct of magical thinking, the relationship between inferential confusion and magical thinking is unexplored. The present study investigated this relationship, and hypothesised that magical thinking would partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. A non-clinical sample of 201 participants (M = 34.94, SD = 15.88) were recruited via Convenience Sampling. Regression analyses found the hypothesised mediating relationship was supported, as magical thinking did partially mediate the relationship between inferential confusion and OC symptoms. Interestingly, inferential confusion had the stronger relationship with OC symptoms in compari...