The Experts below are selected from a list of 22404 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Coleman, Anita Sundaram - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Self-Archiving and the Copyright Transfer Agreements of ISI-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals
    2006
    Co-Authors: Coleman, Anita Sundaram
    Abstract:

    This is a preprint version of a paper submitted to the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. A study of ISI ranked Library and Information Science (LIS) journals (n=52) is reported. The study examined the stances of publishers as expressed in the Copyright Transfer Agreements (CTAs) of the journals towards self-archiving, the practice of depositing digital copies of one's works, preferably in an OAI-compliant open access repository. Results show that 62 % (32) do not make their CTAs available on the open web; 38 % (20) do. Of the 38 % that have CTAs available, two are open access journals. Even among the 20 journal CTAs publicly available a high level of ambiguity exists. Of the 62 % that do not have a public CTA, 40 % are silent about self-archiving. Closer examination augmented by publisher policy documents on Copyright, self-archiving, and author instructions, reveals that only five, 10% of the ISI-ranked LIS journals, actually prohibit self-archiving by publisher rule. Copyright Transfer agreements are a moving target and publishers appear to be acknowledging that Copyright and open access can co-exist in the scholarly journal publishing arena. Given the ambivalence of journal publishers, the communities might be better off by self-archiving in open access archives and strategically building an LIS information commons through a society-led global scholarly communication consortium. The aggregation of OAI-compliant archives and development of disciplinary-specific library services for an LIS commons has the potential to increase the field's research impact and visibility besides ameliorating its own scholarly communication and publishing systems, and serving as a model for others

  • Self-Archiving and the Copyright Transfer Agreements of ISI-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals
    2006
    Co-Authors: Coleman, Anita Sundaram
    Abstract:

    This paper has been published in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (. A study of Thomson-Scientific ISI ranked Library and Information Science (LIS) journals (n=52) is reported. The study examined the stances of publishers as expressed in the Copyright Transfer Agreements (CTAs) of the journals, towards self-archiving, the practice of depositing digital copies of one's works in an OAI-compliant open access repository. 62 % (32) do not make their CTAs available on the open web; 38 % (20) do. Of the 38 % that do make CTAs available, two are open access journals. Of the 62 % that do not have a publicly available CTA, 40 % are silent about self-archiving. Even among the 20 journal CTAs publicly available there is a high level of ambiguity. Closer examination augmented by publisher policy documents on Copyright, self-archiving, and instructions to authors, reveal that only five, 10% of the ISI-ranked LIS journals in the study, actually prohibit self-archiving by publisher rule. Copyright is a moving target but publishers appear to be acknowledging that Copyright and open access can co-exist in scholarly journal publishing. The ambivalence of LIS journal publishers provides unique opportunities to members of the community. Authors can self-archive in open access archives. A society-led global scholarly communication consortium can engage in the strategic building of the LIS information commons. Aggregating OAI-compliant archives and developing disciplinary-specific library services for an LIS commons has the potential to increase the field's research impact and visibility. It may also ameliorate its own scholarly communication and publishing systems and serve as a model for others. Author's addendum: This preprint incorrectly states that ISI-SSCI was source (p. 9-10). Actual final source was JCR 2004 with SSCI serving as a cross-check

Jan Fritz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • open access journal policies a systematic analysis of radiology journals
    Journal of The American College of Radiology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Anand K Narayan, Katie Lobner, Jan Fritz
    Abstract:

    Abstract Objective The open access movement has pushed for greater access to scientific knowledge by expanding access to scientific journal articles. There is limited information about the extent to which open access policies have been adopted by radiology journals. We performed a systematic analysis to ascertain the proportion of radiology journals with open access options. Materials and Methods A search was performed with the assistance of a clinical informationist. Full and mixed English-language diagnostic and interventional radiology Web of Science journals (impact factors > 1.0) were included. Nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, physics, and solicitation-only journals were excluded. Primary outcome was open access option (yes or no) with additional outcomes including presence or absence of embargo, complete or partial Copyright Transfer, publication fees, and self-archiving policies. Secondary outcomes included journal citations, journal impact factors, immediacy, Eigenfactor, and article influence scores. Independent double readings were performed with differences resolved by consensus, supplemented by contacting editorial staff at each journal. Results In all, 125 journals were identified; review yielded 49 journals (39%, mean impact factor of 2.61). Thirty-six of the journals had open access options (73.4%), and four journals were exclusively open access (8.2%). Twelve-month embargoes were most commonly cited (90.6%) with 28.6% of journals stating that they did not require a complete Transfer of Copyright. Prices for open access options ranged from $750 to $4,000 (median $3,000). No statistically significant differences were found in journal impact measures comparing journals with open access options to journals without open access options. Conclusions Diagnostic and interventional radiology journals have widely adopted open access options with a few radiology journals being exclusively open access.

Anita Coleman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Self-Archiving and the Copyright Transfer Agreements of ISI-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals by
    2008
    Co-Authors: Anita Coleman
    Abstract:

    A study of ISI ranked Library and Information Science (LIS) journals (n=52) is reported. The study examined the stances of publishers as expressed in the Copyright Transfer Agreements (CTAs) of the journals towards self-archiving, the practice of depositing digital copies of one's works, preferably in an OAI-compliant open access repository. Results show that 62 % (32) do not make their CTAs available on the open web; 38 % (20) do. Of the 38 % that have CTAs available, two are open access journals. Even among the 20 journal CTAs publicly available a high level of ambiguity exists. Of the 62 % that do not have a public CTA, 40 % are silent about self-archiving. Closer examination augmented by publisher policy documents on Copyright, self-archiving, and author instructions, reveals that only five, 10 % of the ISI-ranked LIS journals, actually prohibit self-archiving by publisher rule. Copyright Transfer agreements are a moving target and publishers appear to be acknowledging that Copyright and open access can co-exist in the scholarly journal publishing arena. Given the ambivalence of journal publishers, the communities might be better off by self-archiving in open access archives and strategically building an LIS information commons through a society-led global scholarly communication consortium. The aggregation of OAI-compliant archives and development o

Ramadhani, Diandra Aura - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK EKONOMI PEMEGANG HAK CIPTA TERKAIT PENAYANGAN VIDEO TIKTOK MENJADI PROGRAM STASIUN TELEVISI YANG BERNILAI KOMERSIAL (Kajian Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan Beijing Treaty 2012)
    Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, 2021
    Co-Authors: Ramadhani, Diandra Aura
    Abstract:

    Diandra Aura Ramadhani, Yuliati, Shanti Riskawati Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya e-mail: diandraur@gmail.com   ABSTRAK Salah satu permasalahan hak cipta yaitu penayangan karya cipta dari media sosial ke stasiun televisi dengan tujuan komersial tanpa seizin dari Pencipta maupun Pemegang Hak Cipta. TikTok adalah salah satu media sosial bagi masyarakat untuk berkreasi menggunakan video pendek. Video pendek termasuk ke dalam bentuk audiovisual. Pengaturan Audiovisual di Indonesia sebenarnya sudah diatur dalam Peraturan Presiden Nomor 2 Tahun 2020, namun di dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta substansi mengenai penjelasan Audiovisual belum tertulis secara jelas. Dalam hal ini Penulis akan membahas perlindungan terhadap karya audiovisual dan perlindungan hak ekonomi Pemegang Hak Cipta TikTok atas pelanggaran hak oleh stasiun televisi ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Hak Cipta dan Beijing Treaty 2012, dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan komparatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, maka Penulis memperoleh hasil bahwa dalam Beijing Treaty mengatur lebih khusus mengenai karya audiovisual sedangkan dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta hanya ditujukan untuk karya audiovisual berupa sinematografi. Dalam mengalihkan hak cipta dibutuhkan izin berupa perjanjian tertulis sebelumnya diantara kedua belah pihak. Pengaturan mengenai perizinan ini telah diatur dalam Ketentuan Layanan TikTok dan juga dalam Pasal 9 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Hak Cipta bahwa setiap orang yang melaksanakan hak ekonomi wajib mendapat izin Pencipta atau Pemegang Hak Cipta serta dilanjutkan dalam ayat (3) pasal tersebut yang melarang melakukan penggandaan dan/atau komersial ciptaan.Kata kunci: Video TikTok, Komersial, Pelanggaran Hak Ekonomi ABSTRACT This research studies the issue of the broadcast of TikTok on TV for commercial purposes without any consent from the Copyright holder or creator. TikTok allows people to create a short video and audiovisual work, and Presidential Regulation Number 2 of 2020 governs audiovisual work, but in Law concerning Copyrights, this matter is not elaborated in detail. This research, thus, mainly aims to study the protection of audiovisual creation and the protection of the economic right of the TikTok Copyright holder over the violation of rights committed by a tv station from the perspective of Law concerning Copyrights and Beijing Treaty 2012. With a statutory and comparative approach, this research reveals that Beijing Treaty specifically regulates audiovisual creation, while Law concerning Copyrights is only restricted to cinematography. Copyright Transfer, however, requires agreement between the two parties on a written contract, and TikTok terms of services and in Article 9 paragraph (2) of Law concerning Copyrights govern this agreement, implying that every individual with his/her economic right must have the consent of the creator or Copyright holder. Paragraph (3) further governs this provision banning any acts of copying and/or commercializing the creation.   Keywords: TikTok Video, commercial, violation of economic right

Coleman Anita - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Self-archiving and the Copyright Transfer Agreements of ISI-ranked library and information science journals
    SJSU ScholarWorks, 2007
    Co-Authors: Coleman Anita
    Abstract:

    A study of Thomson-Scientific ISI ranked Library and Information Science (LIS) journals (n = 52) is reported. The study examined the stances of publishers as expressed in the Copyright Transfer Agreements (CTAs) of the journals toward self-archiving, the practice of depositing digital copies of one\u27s works in an Open Archives Initiative (OAI)-compliant open access repository. Sixty-two percent (32) do not make their CTAs available on the open Web; 38% (20) do. Of the 38% that do make CTAs available, two are open access journals. Of the 62% that do not have a publicly available CTA, 40% are silent about self-archiving. Even among the 20 journal CTAs publicly available there is a high level of ambiguity. Closer examination augmented by publisher policy documents on Copyright, self-archiving, and instructions to authors reveals that only five, 10% of the ISI-ranked LIS journals in the study, actually prohibit self-archiving by publisher rule. Copyright is a moving target, but publishers appear to be acknowledging that Copyright and open access can co-exist in scholarly journal publishing. The ambivalence of LIS journal publishers provides unique opportunities to members of the community. Authors can self-archive in open access archives. A society-led, global scholarly communication consortium can engage in the strategic building of the LIS information commons. Aggregating OAI-compliant archives and developing disciplinary-specific library services for an LIS commons has the potential to increase the field\u27s research impact and visibility. It may also ameliorate its own scholarly communication and publishing systems and serve as a model for others