The Experts below are selected from a list of 129 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Yuji Inagki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Palpitomonas bilix represents a basal cryptist lineage: insight into the character evolution in Cryptista.
Scientific reports, 2014Co-Authors: Akinori Yabuki, Ryoma Kamikawa, Sohta A. Ishikawa, Martin Kolisko, Eunsoo Kim, Akifumi S. Tanabe, Keitaro Kume, Ken-ichiro Ishida, Yuji InagkiAbstract:Palpitomonas bilix represents a basal cryptist lineage: insight into the character evolution in Cryptista
-
Palpitomonas bilix represents a basal cryptist lineage: insight into the character evolution in Cryptista
Scientific Reports, 2014Co-Authors: Akinori Yabuki, Ryoma Kamikawa, Sohta A. Ishikawa, Martin Kolisko, Eunsoo Kim, Akifumi S. Tanabe, Keitaro Kume, Ken-ichiro Ishida, Yuji InagkiAbstract:Phylogenetic position of the marine biflagellate Palpitomonas bilix is intriguing, since several ultrastructural characteristics implied its evolutionary connection to Archaeplastida or Hacrobia. The origin and early evolution of these two eukaryotic assemblages have yet to be fully elucidated and P. bilix may be a key lineage in tracing those groups' early evolution. In the present study, we analyzed a ‘phylogenomic’ alignment of 157 genes to clarify the position of P. bilix in eukaryotic phylogeny. In the 157-gene phylogeny, P. bilix was found to be basal to a clade of cryptophytes, goniomonads and kathablepharids, collectively known as Cryptista, which is proposed to be a part of the larger taxonomic assemblage Hacrobia. We here discuss the taxonomic assignment of P. bilix and character evolution in Cryptista.
Bernard Henrissat - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
nuclear genome sequence of the plastid lacking cryptomonad goniomonas avonlea provides insights into the evolution of secondary plastids
BMC Biology, 2018Co-Authors: Ugo Cenci, Ryoma Kamikawa, Laura Eme, Shannon J Sibbald, Bruce A Curtis, Daniel Moog, Bernard HenrissatAbstract:The evolution of photosynthesis has been a major driver in eukaryotic diversification. Eukaryotes have acquired plastids (chloroplasts) either directly via the engulfment and integration of a photosynthetic cyanobacterium (primary endosymbiosis) or indirectly by engulfing a photosynthetic eukaryote (secondary or tertiary endosymbiosis). The timing and frequency of secondary endosymbiosis during eukaryotic evolution is currently unclear but may be resolved in part by studying cryptomonads, a group of single-celled eukaryotes comprised of both photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic species. While cryptomonads such as Guillardia theta harbor a red algal-derived plastid of secondary endosymbiotic origin, members of the sister group Goniomonadea lack plastids. Here, we present the genome of Goniomonas avonlea—the first for any goniomonad—to address whether Goniomonadea are ancestrally non-photosynthetic or whether they lost a plastid secondarily. We sequenced the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of Goniomonas avonlea and carried out a comparative analysis of Go. avonlea, Gu. theta, and other cryptomonads. The Go. avonlea genome assembly is ~ 92 Mbp in size, with 33,470 predicted protein-coding genes. Interestingly, some metabolic pathways (e.g., fatty acid biosynthesis) predicted to occur in the plastid and periplastidal compartment of Gu. theta appear to operate in the cytoplasm of Go. avonlea, suggesting that metabolic redundancies were generated during the course of secondary plastid integration. Other cytosolic pathways found in Go. avonlea are not found in Gu. theta, suggesting secondary loss in Gu. theta and other plastid-bearing cryptomonads. Phylogenetic analyses revealed no evidence for algal endosymbiont-derived genes in the Go. avonlea genome. Phylogenomic analyses point to a specific relationship between Cryptista (to which cryptomonads belong) and Archaeplastida. We found no convincing genomic or phylogenomic evidence that Go. avonlea evolved from a secondary red algal plastid-bearing ancestor, consistent with goniomonads being ancestrally non-photosynthetic eukaryotes. The Go. avonlea genome sheds light on the physiology of heterotrophic cryptomonads and serves as an important reference point for studying the metabolic “rewiring” that took place during secondary plastid integration in the ancestor of modern-day Cryptophyceae.
Ryoma Kamikawa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
nuclear genome sequence of the plastid lacking cryptomonad goniomonas avonlea provides insights into the evolution of secondary plastids
BMC Biology, 2018Co-Authors: Ugo Cenci, Ryoma Kamikawa, Laura Eme, Shannon J Sibbald, Bruce A Curtis, Daniel Moog, Bernard HenrissatAbstract:The evolution of photosynthesis has been a major driver in eukaryotic diversification. Eukaryotes have acquired plastids (chloroplasts) either directly via the engulfment and integration of a photosynthetic cyanobacterium (primary endosymbiosis) or indirectly by engulfing a photosynthetic eukaryote (secondary or tertiary endosymbiosis). The timing and frequency of secondary endosymbiosis during eukaryotic evolution is currently unclear but may be resolved in part by studying cryptomonads, a group of single-celled eukaryotes comprised of both photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic species. While cryptomonads such as Guillardia theta harbor a red algal-derived plastid of secondary endosymbiotic origin, members of the sister group Goniomonadea lack plastids. Here, we present the genome of Goniomonas avonlea—the first for any goniomonad—to address whether Goniomonadea are ancestrally non-photosynthetic or whether they lost a plastid secondarily. We sequenced the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of Goniomonas avonlea and carried out a comparative analysis of Go. avonlea, Gu. theta, and other cryptomonads. The Go. avonlea genome assembly is ~ 92 Mbp in size, with 33,470 predicted protein-coding genes. Interestingly, some metabolic pathways (e.g., fatty acid biosynthesis) predicted to occur in the plastid and periplastidal compartment of Gu. theta appear to operate in the cytoplasm of Go. avonlea, suggesting that metabolic redundancies were generated during the course of secondary plastid integration. Other cytosolic pathways found in Go. avonlea are not found in Gu. theta, suggesting secondary loss in Gu. theta and other plastid-bearing cryptomonads. Phylogenetic analyses revealed no evidence for algal endosymbiont-derived genes in the Go. avonlea genome. Phylogenomic analyses point to a specific relationship between Cryptista (to which cryptomonads belong) and Archaeplastida. We found no convincing genomic or phylogenomic evidence that Go. avonlea evolved from a secondary red algal plastid-bearing ancestor, consistent with goniomonads being ancestrally non-photosynthetic eukaryotes. The Go. avonlea genome sheds light on the physiology of heterotrophic cryptomonads and serves as an important reference point for studying the metabolic “rewiring” that took place during secondary plastid integration in the ancestor of modern-day Cryptophyceae.
-
Palpitomonas bilix represents a basal cryptist lineage: insight into the character evolution in Cryptista.
Scientific reports, 2014Co-Authors: Akinori Yabuki, Ryoma Kamikawa, Sohta A. Ishikawa, Martin Kolisko, Eunsoo Kim, Akifumi S. Tanabe, Keitaro Kume, Ken-ichiro Ishida, Yuji InagkiAbstract:Palpitomonas bilix represents a basal cryptist lineage: insight into the character evolution in Cryptista
-
Palpitomonas bilix represents a basal cryptist lineage: insight into the character evolution in Cryptista
Scientific Reports, 2014Co-Authors: Akinori Yabuki, Ryoma Kamikawa, Sohta A. Ishikawa, Martin Kolisko, Eunsoo Kim, Akifumi S. Tanabe, Keitaro Kume, Ken-ichiro Ishida, Yuji InagkiAbstract:Phylogenetic position of the marine biflagellate Palpitomonas bilix is intriguing, since several ultrastructural characteristics implied its evolutionary connection to Archaeplastida or Hacrobia. The origin and early evolution of these two eukaryotic assemblages have yet to be fully elucidated and P. bilix may be a key lineage in tracing those groups' early evolution. In the present study, we analyzed a ‘phylogenomic’ alignment of 157 genes to clarify the position of P. bilix in eukaryotic phylogeny. In the 157-gene phylogeny, P. bilix was found to be basal to a clade of cryptophytes, goniomonads and kathablepharids, collectively known as Cryptista, which is proposed to be a part of the larger taxonomic assemblage Hacrobia. We here discuss the taxonomic assignment of P. bilix and character evolution in Cryptista.
Thomas Cavaliersmith - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
multiple origins of heliozoa from flagellate ancestors new cryptist subphylum corbihelia superclass corbistoma and monophyly of haptista Cryptista hacrobia and chromista
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2015Co-Authors: Thomas Cavaliersmith, Ema E. Chao, Rhodri LewisAbstract:Abstract Heliozoan protists have radiating cell projections (axopodia) supported by microtubular axonemes nucleated by the centrosome and bearing granule-like extrusomes for catching prey. To clarify previously confused heliozoan phylogeny we sequenced partial transcriptomes of two tiny naked heliozoa, the endohelean Microheliella maris and centrohelid Oxnerella marina, and the cercozoan pseudoheliozoan Minimassisteria diva. Phylogenetic analysis of 187 genes confirms that all are chromists; but centrohelids (microtubules arranged as hexagons and triangles) are not sisters to Endohelea having axonemes in transnuclear cytoplasmic channels (triangular or square microtubular arrays). Centrohelids are strongly sister to haptophytes (together phylum Haptista); we explain the common origins of their axopodia and haptonema. Microheliella is sister to new superclass Corbistoma (zooflagellate Telonemea and Picomonadea, with asymmetric microfilamentous pharyngeal basket), showing that these axopodial protists evolved independently from zooflagellate ancestors. We group Corbistoma and Endohelea as new cryptist subphylum Corbihelia with dense fibrillar interorganellar connections; endohelean axopodia and Telonema cortex are ultrastructurally related. Differently sampled trees clarify why corticate multigene eukaryote phylogeny is problematic: long-branch artefacts probably distort deep multigene phylogeny of corticates (Plantae, Chromista); basal radiations may be contradictorily reconstructed because of their extreme closeness and the Bayesian star-tree paradox. Haptista and Hacrobia are holophyletic, and Chromista probably are.
-
protist phylogeny and the high level classification of protozoa
European Journal of Protistology, 2003Co-Authors: Thomas CavaliersmithAbstract:Protist large-scale phylogeny is briefly reviewed and a revised higher classification of the kingdom Protozoa into 11 phyla presented. Complementary gene fusions reveal a fundamental bifurcation among eukaryotes between two major clades: the ancestrally uniciliate (often unicentriolar) unikonts and the ancestrally biciliate bikonts, which undergo ciliary transformation by converting a younger anterior cilium into a dissimilar older posterior cilium. Unikonts comprise the ancestrally unikont protozoan phylum Amoebozoa and the opisthokonts (kingdom Animalia, phylum Choanozoa, their sisters or ancestors; and kingdom Fungi). They share a derived triple-gene fusion, absent from bikonts. Bikonts contrastingly share a derived gene fusion between dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase and include plants and all other protists, comprising the protozoan infrakingdoms Rhizaria [phyla Cercozoa and Retaria (Radiozoa, Foraminifera)] and Excavata (phyla Loukozoa, Metamonada, Euglenozoa, Percolozoa), plus the kingdom Plantae [Viridaeplantae, Rhodophyta (sisters); Glaucophyta], the chromalveolate clade, and the protozoan phylum Apusozoa (Thecomonadea, Diphylleida). Chromalveolates comprise kingdom Chromista (Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta) and the protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata [phyla Ciliophora and Miozoa (= Protalveolata, Dinozoa, Apicomplexa)], which diverged from a common ancestor that enslaved a red alga and evolved novel plastid protein-targeting machinery via the host rough ER and the enslaved algal plasma membrane (periplastid membrane). The branching order of the five bikont groups is uncertain: Plantae may be sisters of or ancestral to chromalveolates (jointly designated corticates as they share cortical alveoli); Rhizaria and Excavata (jointly cabozoa) are probably sisters if the formerly green algal plastid of euglenoids and chlorarachneans (Cercozoa) was enslaved in a single event in their common ancestor. Apusozoa may be sisters of Excavata and centrohelid heliozoa may be sisters to Haptophyta.
-
kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla
Microbiological Research, 1993Co-Authors: Thomas CavaliersmithAbstract:The demarcation of protist kingdoms is reviewed, a complete revised classification down to the level of subclass is provided for the kingdoms Protozoa, Archezoa, and Chromista, and the phylogenetic basis of the revised classification is outlined. Removal of Archezoa because of their ancestral absence of mitochondria, peroxisomes, and Golgi dictyosomes makes the kingdom Protozoa much more homogeneous: they all either have mitochondria and peroxisomes or have secondarily lost them. Predominantly phagotrophic, Protozoa are distinguished from the mainly photosynthetic kingdom Chromista (Chlorarachniophyta, Cryptista, Heterokonta, and Haptophyta) by the absence of epiciliary retronemes (rigid thrust-reversing tubular ciliary hairs) and by the lack of two additional membranes outside their chloroplast envelopes. The kingdom Protozoa has two subkingdoms: Adictyozoa, without Golgi dictyosomes, containing only the phylum Percolozoa (flagellates and amoeboflagellates); and Dictyozoa, made up of 17 phyla with Golgi dictyosomes. Dictyozoa are divided into two branches: (i) Parabasalia, a single phylum with hydrogenosomes and 70S ribosomes but no mitochondria, Golgi dictyosomes associated with striated roots, and a kinetid of four or five cilia; and (ii) Bikonta (16 unicellular or plasmodial phyla with mitochondria and bikinetids and in which Golgi dictyosomes are not associated with striated ciliary roots), which are divided into two infrakingdoms: Euglenozoa (flagellates with discoid mitochondrial cristae and trans-splicing of miniexons for all nuclear genes) and Neozoa (15 phyla of more advanced protozoa with tubular or flat [usually nondiscoid] mitochondrial cristae and cis-spliced spliceosomal introns). Neozoa are divided into seven parvkingdoms: (i) Ciliomyxa (three predominantly ciliated phyla with tubular mitochondrial cristae but no cortical alveoli, i.e., Opalozoa [flagellates with tubular cristae], Mycetozoa [slime molds], and Choanozoa [choanoflagellates, with flattened cristae]); (ii) Alveolata (three phyla with cortical alveoli and tubular mitochondrial cristae, i.e., Dinozoa [Dinoflagellata and Protalveolata], Apicomplexa, and Ciliophora); (iii) Neosarcodina (phyla Rhizopoda [lobose and filose amoebae] and Reticulosa [foraminifera; reticulopodial amoebae], usually with tubular cristae); (iv) Actinopoda (two phyla with axopodia: Heliozoa and Radiozoa [Radiolaria, Acantharia]); (v) Entamoebia (a single phylum of amoebae with no mitochondria, peroxisomes, hydrogenosomes, or cilia and with transient intranuclear centrosomes); (vi) Myxozoa (three endoparasitic phyla with multicellular spores, mitochondria, and no cilia: Myxosporidia, Haplosporidia, and Paramyxia); and (vii) Mesozoa (multicells with tubular mitochondrial cristae, included in Protozoa because, unlike animals, they lack collagenous connective tissue).
Akinori Yabuki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Palpitomonas bilix represents a basal cryptist lineage: insight into the character evolution in Cryptista.
Scientific reports, 2014Co-Authors: Akinori Yabuki, Ryoma Kamikawa, Sohta A. Ishikawa, Martin Kolisko, Eunsoo Kim, Akifumi S. Tanabe, Keitaro Kume, Ken-ichiro Ishida, Yuji InagkiAbstract:Palpitomonas bilix represents a basal cryptist lineage: insight into the character evolution in Cryptista
-
Palpitomonas bilix represents a basal cryptist lineage: insight into the character evolution in Cryptista
Scientific Reports, 2014Co-Authors: Akinori Yabuki, Ryoma Kamikawa, Sohta A. Ishikawa, Martin Kolisko, Eunsoo Kim, Akifumi S. Tanabe, Keitaro Kume, Ken-ichiro Ishida, Yuji InagkiAbstract:Phylogenetic position of the marine biflagellate Palpitomonas bilix is intriguing, since several ultrastructural characteristics implied its evolutionary connection to Archaeplastida or Hacrobia. The origin and early evolution of these two eukaryotic assemblages have yet to be fully elucidated and P. bilix may be a key lineage in tracing those groups' early evolution. In the present study, we analyzed a ‘phylogenomic’ alignment of 157 genes to clarify the position of P. bilix in eukaryotic phylogeny. In the 157-gene phylogeny, P. bilix was found to be basal to a clade of cryptophytes, goniomonads and kathablepharids, collectively known as Cryptista, which is proposed to be a part of the larger taxonomic assemblage Hacrobia. We here discuss the taxonomic assignment of P. bilix and character evolution in Cryptista.