The Experts below are selected from a list of 30 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Mike Mariano - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
5 Key Steps to Developing a Solid Data Retention Policy | I.S. Partners
2018Co-Authors: Mike MarianoAbstract:What Is a Data Retention Policy and Why Do You Need One? A Data Retention Policy is a key step in managing and protecting an organizations important ...
-
5 key steps to developing a solid Data Retention Policy i s partners
2018Co-Authors: Mike MarianoAbstract:What Is a Data Retention Policy and Why Do You Need One? A Data Retention Policy is a key step in managing and protecting an organizations important ...
Patricia L. Bellia - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Memory Gap in Surveillance Law
University of Chicago Law Review, 2008Co-Authors: Patricia L. BelliaAbstract:In March 2007, Google announced a change in its Data Retention Policy: that it would “anonymize” search Data in its server logs after eighteen to twenty-four months. 1 For many observers, the Policy change was more significant for the past practice it confirmed than for the future practice it heralded. The Policy change underscored that since it first launched its search service, Google had stored its users’ search queries, along with the search results on which the users clicked, indefinitely, and had done so in such a way that this Data could be tied to the particular computers from which the queries were made. 2
Tony Fielder - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Data Retention Policy
2007Co-Authors: Tony FielderAbstract:Our Data Retention Policy covers the 'lifespan' of records and information that we hold, from creation through to destruction or Retention for historical or research purposes.
Ian Hosein - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Policy discourse and Data Retention: The technology politics of surveillance in the United Kingdom
Telecommunications Policy, 2005Co-Authors: Edgar A. Whitley, Ian HoseinAbstract:This article presents an analysis of UK legislation on the Retention of communications Data that was introduced in the aftermath of the attacks of September 11, 2001. It presents a review of the discourses surrounding this legislation in parliament, in the wider international Policy arena, in business and in terms of technology. The review of these discourses demonstrates that, in understanding policies involving a significant technological component such as communications Data Retention, Policy alternatives may be evaluated only with an appreciation of technological characteristics alongside the traditional concerns of legislators, civil society and the business community. While academia has developed many forms of analysis for political, international, and regulatory discourses, the same must be undertaken for technological discourse, i.e. the interactions between the policies in question, the actors, and the technologies. Developing forms of analysis for technological discourses will likely lead to further understanding of both the Policy problem and the actors’ interests. The paper also shows how current institutions are slowly developing the necessary skills to incorporate the technological aspects of Policy into political debate, and calls for a similar development for the law.
Edgar A. Whitley - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Policy discourse and Data Retention: The technology politics of surveillance in the United Kingdom
Telecommunications Policy, 2005Co-Authors: Edgar A. Whitley, Ian HoseinAbstract:This article presents an analysis of UK legislation on the Retention of communications Data that was introduced in the aftermath of the attacks of September 11, 2001. It presents a review of the discourses surrounding this legislation in parliament, in the wider international Policy arena, in business and in terms of technology. The review of these discourses demonstrates that, in understanding policies involving a significant technological component such as communications Data Retention, Policy alternatives may be evaluated only with an appreciation of technological characteristics alongside the traditional concerns of legislators, civil society and the business community. While academia has developed many forms of analysis for political, international, and regulatory discourses, the same must be undertaken for technological discourse, i.e. the interactions between the policies in question, the actors, and the technologies. Developing forms of analysis for technological discourses will likely lead to further understanding of both the Policy problem and the actors’ interests. The paper also shows how current institutions are slowly developing the necessary skills to incorporate the technological aspects of Policy into political debate, and calls for a similar development for the law.
