Defense Policy

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 360 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Gerald Schneider - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • eliciting substance from hot air financial market responses to eu summit decisions on european Defense
    International Organization, 2010
    Co-Authors: Michael M Bechtel, Gerald Schneider
    Abstract:

    The results of deliberations in multilateral fora are often considered as ineffective. Decision making in the European Union (EU) and in particular its key intergovernmental body, the European Council, poses no exception. Especially in the domain of EU foreign and security affairs the unanimity requirement governing this institution allegedly allows nationalist governments to torpedo any attempt to build up a credible European Defense force and a unified foreign Policy stance. In this paper, we take issue with the claim that multilateral summits merely result in "hot air" by looking at whether and how decisions made during EU summit meetings affect the European Defense industry. We argue that investors react positively to a successful strengthening of Europe's military component - a vital part of the intensified cooperation within the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) - since such decisions increase the demand for military products and raise the expected profits in the European Defense industry. Our findings lend empirical support to the view that financial markets indeed evaluate the substance of European Council meetings and react positively to those summit decisions which consolidated EU military capabilities and the ESDP. Each of these substantial Council decisions increased the value of the European Defense sector by about 4 billion Euros on average. This shows that multilateral decisions can have considerable economic and financial repercussions.

  • eliciting substance from hot air financial market responses to eu summit decisions on european Defense
    2009
    Co-Authors: Michael M Bechtel, Gerald Schneider
    Abstract:

    The results of deliberations in multilateral fora are often considered as ineffective. Decision making in the European Union (EU) and in particular its key intergovernmental body, the European Council, poses no exception. Especially in the domain of EU foreign and security affairs the unanimity requirement governing this institution allegedly allows nationalist governments to torpedo any attempt to build up a credible European Defense force and a unified foreign Policy stance. In this paper, we take issue with the claim that multilateral summits merely result in "hot air" by looking at whether and how decisions made during EU summit meetings affect the European Defense industry. We argue that investors react positively to a successful strengthening of Europe's military component - a vital part of the intensified cooperation within the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) - since such decisions increase the demand for military products and raise the expected profits in the European Defense industry. Our findings lend empirical support to the view that financial markets indeed evaluate the substance of European Council meetings and only react to those summit decisions which consolidated EU military capabilities and the ESDP. Each of these substantial Council decisions increased the value of the European Defense sector by about 4 billion Euros on average. This shows that multilateral decisions can have considerable economic and financial repercussions.

Zhu Han - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • "Borrowing Arrows with Thatched Boats": The Art of Defeating Reactive Jammers in IoT Networks.
    arXiv: Signal Processing, 2019
    Co-Authors: Dinh Thai Hoang, Mohammad Abu Alsheikh, Shimin Gong, Diep N. Nguyen, Eryk Dutkiewicz, Dusit Niyato, Zhu Han
    Abstract:

    In this article, we introduce a novel deception strategy which is inspired by the "Borrowing Arrows with Thatched Boats", one of the most famous military tactics in the history, in order to defeat reactive jamming attacks for low-power IoT networks. Our proposed strategy allows resource-constrained IoT devices to be able to defeat powerful reactive jammers by leveraging their own jamming signals. More specifically, by stimulating the jammer to attack the channel through transmitting fake transmissions, the IoT system can not only undermine the jammer's power, but also harvest energy or utilize jamming signals as a communication means to transmit data through using RF energy harvesting and ambient backscatter techniques, respectively. Furthermore, we develop a low-cost deep reinforcement learning framework that enables the hardware-constrained IoT device to quickly obtain an optimal Defense Policy without requiring any information about the jammer in advance. Simulation results reveal that our proposed framework can not only be very effective in defeating reactive jamming attacks, but also leverage jammer's power to enhance system performance for the IoT network.

Robert E Hunter - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the european security and Defense Policy nato s companion or competitor
    Foreign Affairs, 2002
    Co-Authors: Robert E Hunter
    Abstract:

    Background -- Introduction -- The grand bargain of Berlin and Brussels -- Beyond Berlin: devil in the details (I) -- St. Malo and beyond -- The three Ds, and a fourth -- Defense capabilities and the Defense capabilities initiative -- From Washington to Cologne -- Congress responds -- The Helsinki watershed -- After Helsinki: getting the NATO-EU relationship right -- Practical arrangements: devil in the details (II) -- Parallel tracks -- U.S. concerns crystallize -- Nice and beyond -- The New U.S. administration -- Sorting it out -- Striking the balance: a U.S. view -- Practical steps: building a transatlantic bridge, not a barrier -- Looking to the future.

  • the european security and Defense Policy nato s companion or competitor
    Foreign Affairs, 2002
    Co-Authors: Philip H Gordon, Robert E Hunter, Simon Duke
    Abstract:

    The European Union's new European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) is a major step toward full European integration, in parallel with progress toward a Common Foreign and Security Policy. The United States supports ESDP - but on the basis that it is created within NATO, separable but not separate from the Alliance, and drawing mainly on NATO's military assets. This book tells the story of ESDP's relationship to NATO - and what must be done to ensure that the storehouse of European security is increased and transatlantic cohesion is preserved.

Michael M Bechtel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • eliciting substance from hot air financial market responses to eu summit decisions on european Defense
    International Organization, 2010
    Co-Authors: Michael M Bechtel, Gerald Schneider
    Abstract:

    The results of deliberations in multilateral fora are often considered as ineffective. Decision making in the European Union (EU) and in particular its key intergovernmental body, the European Council, poses no exception. Especially in the domain of EU foreign and security affairs the unanimity requirement governing this institution allegedly allows nationalist governments to torpedo any attempt to build up a credible European Defense force and a unified foreign Policy stance. In this paper, we take issue with the claim that multilateral summits merely result in "hot air" by looking at whether and how decisions made during EU summit meetings affect the European Defense industry. We argue that investors react positively to a successful strengthening of Europe's military component - a vital part of the intensified cooperation within the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) - since such decisions increase the demand for military products and raise the expected profits in the European Defense industry. Our findings lend empirical support to the view that financial markets indeed evaluate the substance of European Council meetings and react positively to those summit decisions which consolidated EU military capabilities and the ESDP. Each of these substantial Council decisions increased the value of the European Defense sector by about 4 billion Euros on average. This shows that multilateral decisions can have considerable economic and financial repercussions.

  • eliciting substance from hot air financial market responses to eu summit decisions on european Defense
    2009
    Co-Authors: Michael M Bechtel, Gerald Schneider
    Abstract:

    The results of deliberations in multilateral fora are often considered as ineffective. Decision making in the European Union (EU) and in particular its key intergovernmental body, the European Council, poses no exception. Especially in the domain of EU foreign and security affairs the unanimity requirement governing this institution allegedly allows nationalist governments to torpedo any attempt to build up a credible European Defense force and a unified foreign Policy stance. In this paper, we take issue with the claim that multilateral summits merely result in "hot air" by looking at whether and how decisions made during EU summit meetings affect the European Defense industry. We argue that investors react positively to a successful strengthening of Europe's military component - a vital part of the intensified cooperation within the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) - since such decisions increase the demand for military products and raise the expected profits in the European Defense industry. Our findings lend empirical support to the view that financial markets indeed evaluate the substance of European Council meetings and only react to those summit decisions which consolidated EU military capabilities and the ESDP. Each of these substantial Council decisions increased the value of the European Defense sector by about 4 billion Euros on average. This shows that multilateral decisions can have considerable economic and financial repercussions.

Simon Duke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the european security and Defense Policy nato s companion or competitor
    Foreign Affairs, 2002
    Co-Authors: Philip H Gordon, Robert E Hunter, Simon Duke
    Abstract:

    The European Union's new European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) is a major step toward full European integration, in parallel with progress toward a Common Foreign and Security Policy. The United States supports ESDP - but on the basis that it is created within NATO, separable but not separate from the Alliance, and drawing mainly on NATO's military assets. This book tells the story of ESDP's relationship to NATO - and what must be done to ensure that the storehouse of European security is increased and transatlantic cohesion is preserved.