The Experts below are selected from a list of 4200 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Chris Sampson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Is routine Dental Prophylaxis effective
Evidence-based Dentistry, 2010Co-Authors: Chris SampsonAbstract:Searches were made for relevant papers using Medline, CINHAL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Embase, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, HealthSTAR, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and ACP (American College of Physicians) Journal Club. Further articles were identified by reviewing the references and bibliographies of the retrieved articles. Articles were limited to original human studies assessing rubber cup Dental Prophylaxis. All other studies, including in vitro studies, reviews and case series, were excluded. Only studies in English with Prophylaxis given at a recall appointment at intervals of 4 months were included. The quality of articles was assessed independently and evidence levels rated. A qualitative synthesis is presented. Four articles relating to Dental Prophylaxis and caries prevention and two articles relating to Dental Prophylaxis and gingivitis prevention were included. Four studies found that a Dental Prophylaxis was not warranted before professionally applied topical fluoride (PATF) for caries prevention in children. A generalisation about Dental Prophylaxis before PATF cannot be applied to adolescents and adults. Available evidence from two other studies fails to demonstrate any benefit in the prevention of gingivitis from further Dental Prophylaxis at the interval used here for recall examinations. To prevent caries in children, Dental Prophylaxis need not be provided either at a recall visit or before PATF. Dental Prophylaxis at intervals of 4 months or more is not justified for the prevention of gingivitis in the general population.
-
Is routine Dental Prophylaxis effective?
Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2010Co-Authors: Chris SampsonAbstract:Data Sources Searches were made for relevant papers using Medline, CINHAL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Embase, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, HealthSTAR, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and ACP (American College of Physicians) Journal Club. Further articles were identified by reviewing the references and bibliographies of the retrieved articles. Study selection Articles were limited to original human studies assessing rubber cup Dental Prophylaxis. All other studies, including in vitro studies, reviews and case series, were excluded. Only studies in English with Prophylaxis given at a recall appointment at intervals of 4 months were included. Data extraction and synthesis The quality of articles was assessed independently and evidence levels rated. A qualitative synthesis is presented. Results Four articles relating to Dental Prophylaxis and caries prevention and two articles relating to Dental Prophylaxis and gingivitis prevention were included. Four studies found that a Dental Prophylaxis was not warranted before professionally applied topical fluoride (PATF) for caries prevention in children. A generalisation about Dental Prophylaxis before PATF cannot be applied to adolescents and adults. Available evidence from two other studies fails to demonstrate any benefit in the prevention of gingivitis from further Dental Prophylaxis at the interval used here for recall examinations. Conclusions To prevent caries in children, Dental Prophylaxis need not be provided either at a recall visit or before PATF. Dental Prophylaxis at intervals of 4 months or more is not justified for the prevention of gingivitis in the general population.
Toshiyuki Takahashi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). MATERIAL AND METHODS After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. CONCLUSIONS Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of cad cam restorative materials
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). MATERIAL AND METHODS After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. CONCLUSIONS Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles
Toshiko Sugiyama - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). MATERIAL AND METHODS After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. CONCLUSIONS Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of cad cam restorative materials
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). MATERIAL AND METHODS After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. CONCLUSIONS Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles
Tomoka Enokuchi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). MATERIAL AND METHODS After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. CONCLUSIONS Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of cad cam restorative materials
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). MATERIAL AND METHODS After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. CONCLUSIONS Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles
Atsushi Kameyama - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). MATERIAL AND METHODS After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. CONCLUSIONS Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of cad cam restorative materials
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). MATERIAL AND METHODS After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. CONCLUSIONS Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles. Key words:CAD/CAM, professional Dental Prophylaxis, prophylactic paste, surface gloss, surface roughness.
-
Effect of professional Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2017Co-Authors: Toshiko Sugiyama, Atsushi Kameyama, Tomoka Enokuchi, Akiko Haruyama, Aoi Chiba, Setsuko Sugiyama, Makoto Hosaka, Toshiyuki TakahashiAbstract:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Dental Prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of different indirect restorative materials for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM): two types of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks (Shofu Block HC and Estelite Block) and two types of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (IPS Empress CAD and Celtra DUO). After polishing the CAD/CAM blocks and applying Prophylaxis pastes, professional Dental Prophylaxis was performed using four different experimental protocols (n = 5 each): mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s four times (Group 1); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 10 s (Group 2); four cycles of mechanical cleaning with Merssage Regular for 10 s and Merssage Fine for 30 s (Group 3); and mechanical cleaning with Merssage Fine for 10 s four times (Group 4). A glossmeter was used to measure surface gloss before and after mechanical cleaning, and a contact stylus profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra). Polishing with prophylactic paste led to a significant reduction in surface gloss and increase in surface roughness among resin composite blocks, whereas the polishing-related change in surface gloss or roughness was smaller in Celtra DUO, a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate block. Changes in surface gloss and roughness due to polishing with a prophylactic paste containing large particles were not improved by subsequent polishing with a prophylactic paste containing fine particles