The Experts below are selected from a list of 303 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Jane A. Weintraub - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • updated competencies for the Dental Public Health specialist using the past and present to frame the future
    Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jane A. Weintraub, Gary R Rozier
    Abstract:

    Objective A new set of competencies for entry-level specialists in Dental Public Health (DPH) developed in 2016 updates the 1998 version. Our objective is to provide some context and perspective on this update. Methods We discuss the evolution of this Dental specialty, how it differs from other Dental specialties, and its importance for the Public's oral Health. Some societal trends that provide the rationale for this update are summarized. The ways in which this set of competencies differs from the last version are described. Results The first set of behavioral objectives was established in 1974 and updated at workshops in 1988 and 1997. Advanced population-based knowledge and Public Health perspectives beyond that obtained in predoctoral Dental education continue to be essential for the nation's oral Health. Since 1998, the impact of the digital age, advances in science and technology, changes in population demographics, Health status and increasing inequalities, treatment needs, prevention and treatment modalities, Healthcare delivery systems, financing, personnel, legislation, and regulations have all influenced DPH practice. The updated competencies include guiding principles for the specialty, a new focus on social determinants of Health, and more flexibility to address the increasing complexity and interdisciplinary nature of Public Health problems and the expanding knowledge and skills needed to address them. The rapid expansion of Public Health education might serve as an important pipeline for future DPH specialists. Conclusion The updated competencies can guide the educational preparation of DPH specialists and are aligned with the rapidly changing environment.

  • Updated competencies for the Dental Public Health specialist: using the past and present to frame the future.
    Journal of public health dentistry, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jane A. Weintraub, R G Rozier
    Abstract:

    A new set of competencies for entry-level specialists in Dental Public Health (DPH) developed in 2016 updates the 1998 version. Our objective is to provide some context and perspective on this update. We discuss the evolution of this Dental specialty, how it differs from other Dental specialties, and its importance for the Public's oral Health. Some societal trends that provide the rationale for this update are summarized. The ways in which this set of competencies differs from the last version are described. The first set of behavioral objectives was established in 1974 and updated at workshops in 1988 and 1997. Advanced population-based knowledge and Public Health perspectives beyond that obtained in predoctoral Dental education continue to be essential for the nation's oral Health. Since 1998, the impact of the digital age, advances in science and technology, changes in population demographics, Health status and increasing inequalities, treatment needs, prevention and treatment modalities, Healthcare delivery systems, financing, personnel, legislation, and regulations have all influenced DPH practice. The updated competencies include guiding principles for the specialty, a new focus on social determinants of Health, and more flexibility to address the increasing complexity and interdisciplinary nature of Public Health problems and the expanding knowledge and skills needed to address them. The rapid expansion of Public Health education might serve as an important pipeline for future DPH specialists. The updated competencies can guide the educational preparation of DPH specialists and are aligned with the rapidly changing environment. © 2016 American Association of Public Health Dentistry and American Board of Dental Public Health.

  • Dental Public Health research in action: population and community-based research.
    Journal of the California Dental Association, 2005
    Co-Authors: Jane A. Weintraub
    Abstract:

    Dental Public Health investigators conduct research from a population and societal perspective. Population-based epidemiologic studies are at the heart of Dental Public Health research, as well as many other types of clinical and translational studies that aim to benefit Dental practice, influence oral Health policies, and improve the oral Health and Health of the Public. This article gives examples of Dental Public Health research in action, including many ongoing or recently completed studies conducted in California.

  • Training status and interest in certification of nondiplomate faculty teaching predoctoral Dental Public Health.
    Journal of public health dentistry, 2001
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Kaste, Zara E. Sadler, Sena Narendran, Linda C. Niessen, Jane A. Weintraub, Kathy L. Hayes
    Abstract:

    Objectives: A survey was conducted to better understand the training needs of faculty members without Dental Public Health (DPH) specialty board certification who teach DPH to Dental students. Methods: An 11-item questionnaire was sent to 193 non-DPH diplomate faculty members at US Dental schools who were dentists and at least one of the following: a member of the American Association of Dental Schools Community and Preventive Dentistry Section, a referral from an academic American Board of Dental Public Health diplomate, a DPH faculty listed on the school's Web pages, a DPH contact from the AADS Institutional Directory, or the school's dean if no other contact. Results: A 70 percent response rate was obtained. Seventy-nine percent of the respondents taught at least one national board-related DPH topic. Among these faculty members, 67 percent have or are in training for the master of Public Health, 26 percent have completed or are in a DPH residency, and 63 percent desire training in one or more of the DPH topics. The majority (64%) does not plan to take the specialty exam, while 28 percent plan to take the exam within five years. About half reported no personal incentives to take the exam and 39 percent perceived no institutional incentives. Conclusions: These nondiplomate teachers of predoctoral DPH desire training, but appear to have barriers and perceive few benefits to achieving DPH board certification.

  • Academic Dental Public Health diplomates: their distribution and recommendations concerning the predoctoral Dental Public Health faculty.
    Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 1998
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Kaste, Zara E. Sadler, Kathy L. Hayes, Sena Narendran, Linda C. Niessen, Jane A. Weintraub
    Abstract:

    Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the representation of academically based diplomates of the American Board of Dental Public Health (ABDPH) and to identify their perceptions on the training of Dental Public Health predoctoral faculty. Methods: Data were collected by a mailed, self-administered, 13-item questionnaire. The population was the 48 diplomates of the ABDPH as of March 1997 associated with academic institutions. Results: Twenty of the 55 US Dental schools had a diplomate of the ABDPH with a mean of 1.8 diplomates per school with a diplomate. An average of 4.5 full-time faculty members per school were associated with teaching Dental Public Health. A master's degree in Public Health (MPH) was the most frequently suggested educational requirement for Dental Public Health faculty. Continuing education courses were training needs perceived for Dental Public Health faculty. The lack of time, money, and incentives, along with perceived rigidity of requirements for board certification, were reported as major barriers for faculty becoming Dental Public Health board certified. Conclusion: Numerous challenges confront the development of a strong Dental Public Health presence in US Dental schools. These challenges include, among others, insufficient numbers of academic Dental Public Health specialists and insufficient motivations to encourage promising candidates to pursue specialty status.

Sasha Scambler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The contributions of qualitative research towards Dental Public Health practice
    Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2007
    Co-Authors: E J Bower, Sasha Scambler
    Abstract:

    Dental Public Health (DPH) researchers have traditionally relied on quantitative methods for scientific enquiry. This paper argues that qualitative methodology can make a significant contribution to DPH knowledge and practice because it allows researchers to answer important questions of relevance to procedure and policy that are difficult to answer satisfactorily using quantitative methods alone. Qualitative research can also challenge the norms and assumptions of DPH practice. There are tensions in the relationship between qualitative research and the prevailing paradigm of evidence-based practice (EBP) which potentially influence the utility of DPH-related qualitative research. However, the relevance of qualitative research is increasing as the scope of EBP enquiry extends beyond questions of effectiveness, and methods are developed for incorporating qualitative research into systematic reviews.

Olubunmi Adekugbe - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The Practice and Infrastructure of Dental Public Health in the United States
    Dental clinics of North America, 2008
    Co-Authors: Myron Allukian, Olubunmi Adekugbe
    Abstract:

    Dental Public Health is a unique and challenging American Dental Association-recognized specialty because the patient is the entire community or population, such as a school, neighborhood, city, state, or the nation, with a focus on vulnerable populations. Limited resources are maximized through prevention, policies, programs, and organized community efforts to respond to great unmet needs. Although Dental Public Health professionals are few in number, millions of people every day have better oral Health because of these professionals, who work on the local, state, and national level.

John G. Rogers - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Building the links between surveillance, research, and policy and practice - Dental Public Health experiences in Australia
    Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2012
    Co-Authors: John G. Rogers
    Abstract:

    Objectives To identify how to translate Dental Public Health surveillance and broader research into policy and practice. Methods Via a literature review to identify both the potential uses of surveillance data and key elements in the policy making process. Then through a consideration of Australian Dental Public Health examples to identify ways to build links between this research and policy making. Results The development of Dental Public Health policy can be complex. Different notions of evidence are held by researchers and policy makers. A cultural gap divides these two groups. Translation of research into policy is more likely if an issue is moved up the policy agenda through judicial articluation of the problem with an associated policy proposal and where polictical factors are positive. If these elements exist, a policy outccome is more possible when a 'policy window' opens. Five ways to build the links between surveillance, research and policy and practice are to communicate across the cultural gap; be prepared for chance opportunities to transfer knowledge; undertake policy relevant research; don't abuse research evidence by making exaggerated claims; and provide timely dissemination of surveillance and research findings. Structural barriers to academics having greater engagement with policy agencies also need to be addressed. Conclusion Translating surveillance and broader research evidence into policy requires active management rather than expecting passive diffusion. Researchers need to understand and act on the external factors that are likely to affect the uptake of their research if they want their research to influence policy and practice.

John Rogers - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Building the links between surveillance, research, and policy and practice--Dental Public Health experiences in Australia.
    Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2012
    Co-Authors: John Rogers
    Abstract:

    To identify how to translate Dental Public Health surveillance and broader research into policy and practice. Via a literature review to identify both the potential uses of surveillance data and key elements in the policy making process. Then through a consideration of Australian Dental Public Health examples to identify ways to build links between this research and policy making. The development of Dental Public Health policy can be complex. Different notions of evidence are held by researchers and policy makers. A cultural gap divides these two groups. Translation of research into policy is more likely if an issue is moved up the policy agenda through judicial articulation of the problem with an associated policy proposal and where political factors are positive. If these elements exist, a policy outcome is more possible when a 'policy window' opens. Five ways to build the links between surveillance, research and policy and practice are to communicate across the cultural gap; be prepared for chance opportunities to transfer knowledge; undertake policy relevant research; don't abuse research evidence by making exaggerated claims; and provide timely dissemination of surveillance and research findings. Structural barriers to academics having greater engagement with policy agencies also need to be addressed. Translating surveillance and broader research evidence into policy requires active management rather than expecting passive diffusion. Researchers need to understand and act on the external factors that are likely to affect the uptake of their research if they want their research to influence policy and practice. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.