The Experts below are selected from a list of 32877 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Robert Harrison - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • hospital Employee assault rates before and after enactment of the california hospital safety and security act
    Annals of Epidemiology, 2009
    Co-Authors: Carri H Casteel, Corinne Peekasa, Maryalice Nocera, Jamie B Smith, James D Blando, Suzi Goldmacher, Emily Ohagan, David Valiante, Robert Harrison
    Abstract:

    PURPOSE: This study examines changes in violent event rates to hospital Employees before and after enactment of the California Hospital Safety and Security Act in 1995. METHODS: We compared pre- and post-initiative Employee assault rates in California (n = 116) emergency Departments and psychiatric units with those in New Jersey (n = 50), where statewide workplace violence initiatives do not exist. Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations was used to compare assault rates between a 3-year pre-enactment period (1993-1995) and a 6-year post-enactment period (1996-2001) using New Jersey hospitals as a temporal control. RESULTS: Assault rates among emergency Department Employees decreased 48% in California post-enactment, compared with emergency Department Employee assault rates in New Jersey (rate ratio [RR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.90). Emergency Department Employee assault rates decreased in smaller facilities (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.96) and for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.79) post-enactment. Among psychiatric units, for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.85) and hospitals located in smaller communities (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.92) experienced decreased assault rates post-enactment. CONCLUSION: Policy may be an effective method to increase safety to health care workers. Language: en

Carri H Casteel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • hospital Employee assault rates before and after enactment of the california hospital safety and security act
    Annals of Epidemiology, 2009
    Co-Authors: Carri H Casteel, Corinne Peekasa, Maryalice Nocera, Jamie B Smith, James D Blando, Suzi Goldmacher, Emily Ohagan, David Valiante, Robert Harrison
    Abstract:

    PURPOSE: This study examines changes in violent event rates to hospital Employees before and after enactment of the California Hospital Safety and Security Act in 1995. METHODS: We compared pre- and post-initiative Employee assault rates in California (n = 116) emergency Departments and psychiatric units with those in New Jersey (n = 50), where statewide workplace violence initiatives do not exist. Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations was used to compare assault rates between a 3-year pre-enactment period (1993-1995) and a 6-year post-enactment period (1996-2001) using New Jersey hospitals as a temporal control. RESULTS: Assault rates among emergency Department Employees decreased 48% in California post-enactment, compared with emergency Department Employee assault rates in New Jersey (rate ratio [RR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.90). Emergency Department Employee assault rates decreased in smaller facilities (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.96) and for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.79) post-enactment. Among psychiatric units, for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.85) and hospitals located in smaller communities (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.92) experienced decreased assault rates post-enactment. CONCLUSION: Policy may be an effective method to increase safety to health care workers. Language: en

Jamie B Smith - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • hospital Employee assault rates before and after enactment of the california hospital safety and security act
    Annals of Epidemiology, 2009
    Co-Authors: Carri H Casteel, Corinne Peekasa, Maryalice Nocera, Jamie B Smith, James D Blando, Suzi Goldmacher, Emily Ohagan, David Valiante, Robert Harrison
    Abstract:

    PURPOSE: This study examines changes in violent event rates to hospital Employees before and after enactment of the California Hospital Safety and Security Act in 1995. METHODS: We compared pre- and post-initiative Employee assault rates in California (n = 116) emergency Departments and psychiatric units with those in New Jersey (n = 50), where statewide workplace violence initiatives do not exist. Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations was used to compare assault rates between a 3-year pre-enactment period (1993-1995) and a 6-year post-enactment period (1996-2001) using New Jersey hospitals as a temporal control. RESULTS: Assault rates among emergency Department Employees decreased 48% in California post-enactment, compared with emergency Department Employee assault rates in New Jersey (rate ratio [RR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.90). Emergency Department Employee assault rates decreased in smaller facilities (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.96) and for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.79) post-enactment. Among psychiatric units, for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.85) and hospitals located in smaller communities (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.92) experienced decreased assault rates post-enactment. CONCLUSION: Policy may be an effective method to increase safety to health care workers. Language: en

James D Blando - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • hospital Employee assault rates before and after enactment of the california hospital safety and security act
    Annals of Epidemiology, 2009
    Co-Authors: Carri H Casteel, Corinne Peekasa, Maryalice Nocera, Jamie B Smith, James D Blando, Suzi Goldmacher, Emily Ohagan, David Valiante, Robert Harrison
    Abstract:

    PURPOSE: This study examines changes in violent event rates to hospital Employees before and after enactment of the California Hospital Safety and Security Act in 1995. METHODS: We compared pre- and post-initiative Employee assault rates in California (n = 116) emergency Departments and psychiatric units with those in New Jersey (n = 50), where statewide workplace violence initiatives do not exist. Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations was used to compare assault rates between a 3-year pre-enactment period (1993-1995) and a 6-year post-enactment period (1996-2001) using New Jersey hospitals as a temporal control. RESULTS: Assault rates among emergency Department Employees decreased 48% in California post-enactment, compared with emergency Department Employee assault rates in New Jersey (rate ratio [RR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.90). Emergency Department Employee assault rates decreased in smaller facilities (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.96) and for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.79) post-enactment. Among psychiatric units, for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.85) and hospitals located in smaller communities (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.92) experienced decreased assault rates post-enactment. CONCLUSION: Policy may be an effective method to increase safety to health care workers. Language: en

David Valiante - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • hospital Employee assault rates before and after enactment of the california hospital safety and security act
    Annals of Epidemiology, 2009
    Co-Authors: Carri H Casteel, Corinne Peekasa, Maryalice Nocera, Jamie B Smith, James D Blando, Suzi Goldmacher, Emily Ohagan, David Valiante, Robert Harrison
    Abstract:

    PURPOSE: This study examines changes in violent event rates to hospital Employees before and after enactment of the California Hospital Safety and Security Act in 1995. METHODS: We compared pre- and post-initiative Employee assault rates in California (n = 116) emergency Departments and psychiatric units with those in New Jersey (n = 50), where statewide workplace violence initiatives do not exist. Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations was used to compare assault rates between a 3-year pre-enactment period (1993-1995) and a 6-year post-enactment period (1996-2001) using New Jersey hospitals as a temporal control. RESULTS: Assault rates among emergency Department Employees decreased 48% in California post-enactment, compared with emergency Department Employee assault rates in New Jersey (rate ratio [RR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.90). Emergency Department Employee assault rates decreased in smaller facilities (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.96) and for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.79) post-enactment. Among psychiatric units, for-profit-controlled hospitals (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.85) and hospitals located in smaller communities (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.92) experienced decreased assault rates post-enactment. CONCLUSION: Policy may be an effective method to increase safety to health care workers. Language: en