The Experts below are selected from a list of 174954 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Katsuro Inoue - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
an experimental comparison of checklist based reading and perspective based reading for uml Design Document inspection
International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2002Co-Authors: Giedre Sabaliauskaite, Fumikazu Matsukawa, Shinji Kusumoto, Katsuro InoueAbstract:This paper describes an experimental comparison of two reading techniques, namely Checklist-based reading (CBR) and Perspective-based reading (PBR) for Object-Oriented (OO) Design inspection. Software inspection is an effective approach to detect defects in the early stages of the software development process. However inspections are usually applied for defect detection in software requirement Documents or software code modules, and there is a significant lack of information how inspections should be applied to OO Design Documents. The comparison was performed in a controlled experiment with 59 subject students. The results of individual data analysis indicate that (a) defect detection effectiveness using both inspection techniques is similar (PBR: 69%, CBR: 70%); (b) reviewers who use PBR spend less time on inspection than reviewers who use CBR; (c) cost per defect of reviewers who use CBR is smaller. The results of 3-person virtual team analysis show that CBR technique is more effective than PBR technique.
-
ISESE - An experimental comparison of checklist-based reading and perspective-based reading for UML Design Document inspection
Proceedings International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 1Co-Authors: Giedre Sabaliauskaite, Fumikazu Matsukawa, Shinji Kusumoto, Katsuro InoueAbstract:This paper describes an experimental comparison of two reading techniques, namely Checklist-based reading (CBR) and Perspective-based reading (PBR) for Object-Oriented (OO) Design inspection. Software inspection is an effective approach to detect defects in the early stages of the software development process. However inspections are usually applied for defect detection in software requirement Documents or software code modules, and there is a significant lack of information how inspections should be applied to OO Design Documents. The comparison was performed in a controlled experiment with 59 subject students. The results of individual data analysis indicate that (a) defect detection effectiveness using both inspection techniques is similar (PBR: 69%, CBR: 70%); (b) reviewers who use PBR spend less time on inspection than reviewers who use CBR; (c) cost per defect of reviewers who use CBR is smaller. The results of 3-person virtual team analysis show that CBR technique is more effective than PBR technique.
Giedre Sabaliauskaite - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
an experimental comparison of checklist based reading and perspective based reading for uml Design Document inspection
International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2002Co-Authors: Giedre Sabaliauskaite, Fumikazu Matsukawa, Shinji Kusumoto, Katsuro InoueAbstract:This paper describes an experimental comparison of two reading techniques, namely Checklist-based reading (CBR) and Perspective-based reading (PBR) for Object-Oriented (OO) Design inspection. Software inspection is an effective approach to detect defects in the early stages of the software development process. However inspections are usually applied for defect detection in software requirement Documents or software code modules, and there is a significant lack of information how inspections should be applied to OO Design Documents. The comparison was performed in a controlled experiment with 59 subject students. The results of individual data analysis indicate that (a) defect detection effectiveness using both inspection techniques is similar (PBR: 69%, CBR: 70%); (b) reviewers who use PBR spend less time on inspection than reviewers who use CBR; (c) cost per defect of reviewers who use CBR is smaller. The results of 3-person virtual team analysis show that CBR technique is more effective than PBR technique.
-
ISESE - An experimental comparison of checklist-based reading and perspective-based reading for UML Design Document inspection
Proceedings International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 1Co-Authors: Giedre Sabaliauskaite, Fumikazu Matsukawa, Shinji Kusumoto, Katsuro InoueAbstract:This paper describes an experimental comparison of two reading techniques, namely Checklist-based reading (CBR) and Perspective-based reading (PBR) for Object-Oriented (OO) Design inspection. Software inspection is an effective approach to detect defects in the early stages of the software development process. However inspections are usually applied for defect detection in software requirement Documents or software code modules, and there is a significant lack of information how inspections should be applied to OO Design Documents. The comparison was performed in a controlled experiment with 59 subject students. The results of individual data analysis indicate that (a) defect detection effectiveness using both inspection techniques is similar (PBR: 69%, CBR: 70%); (b) reviewers who use PBR spend less time on inspection than reviewers who use CBR; (c) cost per defect of reviewers who use CBR is smaller. The results of 3-person virtual team analysis show that CBR technique is more effective than PBR technique.
Fumikazu Matsukawa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
an experimental comparison of checklist based reading and perspective based reading for uml Design Document inspection
International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2002Co-Authors: Giedre Sabaliauskaite, Fumikazu Matsukawa, Shinji Kusumoto, Katsuro InoueAbstract:This paper describes an experimental comparison of two reading techniques, namely Checklist-based reading (CBR) and Perspective-based reading (PBR) for Object-Oriented (OO) Design inspection. Software inspection is an effective approach to detect defects in the early stages of the software development process. However inspections are usually applied for defect detection in software requirement Documents or software code modules, and there is a significant lack of information how inspections should be applied to OO Design Documents. The comparison was performed in a controlled experiment with 59 subject students. The results of individual data analysis indicate that (a) defect detection effectiveness using both inspection techniques is similar (PBR: 69%, CBR: 70%); (b) reviewers who use PBR spend less time on inspection than reviewers who use CBR; (c) cost per defect of reviewers who use CBR is smaller. The results of 3-person virtual team analysis show that CBR technique is more effective than PBR technique.
-
ISESE - An experimental comparison of checklist-based reading and perspective-based reading for UML Design Document inspection
Proceedings International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 1Co-Authors: Giedre Sabaliauskaite, Fumikazu Matsukawa, Shinji Kusumoto, Katsuro InoueAbstract:This paper describes an experimental comparison of two reading techniques, namely Checklist-based reading (CBR) and Perspective-based reading (PBR) for Object-Oriented (OO) Design inspection. Software inspection is an effective approach to detect defects in the early stages of the software development process. However inspections are usually applied for defect detection in software requirement Documents or software code modules, and there is a significant lack of information how inspections should be applied to OO Design Documents. The comparison was performed in a controlled experiment with 59 subject students. The results of individual data analysis indicate that (a) defect detection effectiveness using both inspection techniques is similar (PBR: 69%, CBR: 70%); (b) reviewers who use PBR spend less time on inspection than reviewers who use CBR; (c) cost per defect of reviewers who use CBR is smaller. The results of 3-person virtual team analysis show that CBR technique is more effective than PBR technique.
Shinji Kusumoto - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
an experimental comparison of checklist based reading and perspective based reading for uml Design Document inspection
International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2002Co-Authors: Giedre Sabaliauskaite, Fumikazu Matsukawa, Shinji Kusumoto, Katsuro InoueAbstract:This paper describes an experimental comparison of two reading techniques, namely Checklist-based reading (CBR) and Perspective-based reading (PBR) for Object-Oriented (OO) Design inspection. Software inspection is an effective approach to detect defects in the early stages of the software development process. However inspections are usually applied for defect detection in software requirement Documents or software code modules, and there is a significant lack of information how inspections should be applied to OO Design Documents. The comparison was performed in a controlled experiment with 59 subject students. The results of individual data analysis indicate that (a) defect detection effectiveness using both inspection techniques is similar (PBR: 69%, CBR: 70%); (b) reviewers who use PBR spend less time on inspection than reviewers who use CBR; (c) cost per defect of reviewers who use CBR is smaller. The results of 3-person virtual team analysis show that CBR technique is more effective than PBR technique.
-
ISESE - An experimental comparison of checklist-based reading and perspective-based reading for UML Design Document inspection
Proceedings International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 1Co-Authors: Giedre Sabaliauskaite, Fumikazu Matsukawa, Shinji Kusumoto, Katsuro InoueAbstract:This paper describes an experimental comparison of two reading techniques, namely Checklist-based reading (CBR) and Perspective-based reading (PBR) for Object-Oriented (OO) Design inspection. Software inspection is an effective approach to detect defects in the early stages of the software development process. However inspections are usually applied for defect detection in software requirement Documents or software code modules, and there is a significant lack of information how inspections should be applied to OO Design Documents. The comparison was performed in a controlled experiment with 59 subject students. The results of individual data analysis indicate that (a) defect detection effectiveness using both inspection techniques is similar (PBR: 69%, CBR: 70%); (b) reviewers who use PBR spend less time on inspection than reviewers who use CBR; (c) cost per defect of reviewers who use CBR is smaller. The results of 3-person virtual team analysis show that CBR technique is more effective than PBR technique.
Anita Goel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
FRAMEWORK FOR TAGGING SOFTWARE IN WEB APPLICATION
Computer Science & Information Technology ( CS & IT ), 2013Co-Authors: Karan Gupta, Anita GoelAbstract:Tagging is included in web application to ease maintenance of large amount of information stored in a web application. With no mention of requirement specification or Design Document for tagging software, academically or otherwise, integrating tagging software in a web application is a tedious task. In this paper, a framework is presented for integrating tagging software into a web application. The framework is for use during different stages of software development life cycle. The requirement component of framework presents a weighted requirement checklist that aids the user in deciding requirement for the tagging software in a web application, from among mandatory and optional requirements. The Design component facilitates the developer in understanding the Design of existing tagging software, modifying it or developing a new one. Also, the framework helps in verification and validation of tagging software integrated in a web application.
-
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR TAGGING SOFTWARE
International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 2013Co-Authors: K C Gupta, Anita GoelAbstract:Tagging is integrated into web application to ease maintenance of large amount of information stored in a web application. With no mention of requirement specification or Design Document for tagging software, academically or otherwise, integrating tagging software in a web application is a tedious task. In this paper, a framework has been created for integration oftagging software in a web application. The framework follows the software development life cycle paradigms and is to be used during it different stages. The requirement component of framework presents a weighted requirement checklist that aids the user in deciding requirement for the tagging software in a web application, from among popular ones. The Design component facilitates the developer in understanding the Design of existing tagging software, modifying it or developing a new one. Also, the framework helps in verification and validation of tagging software integrated in a web application.