The Experts below are selected from a list of 207 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
David Sundaram - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
PACIS - Design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems: A Framework for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant Users
2014Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, Michael D Myers, David SundaramAbstract:This paper focuses on the design and implementation of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant users. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). A multi-methodological approach was used to explore the design requirements for Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design as compared with Traditional Information Systems design. The findings suggest that Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems are part of a large organisational Digital ecosystem, and hence a design and implementation framework for these systems needs to reflect this. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for the Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design process.
-
design of organisational ubiquitous information systems a framework for Digital native and Digital Immigrant users
Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 2014Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, Michael D Myers, David SundaramAbstract:This paper focuses on the design and implementation of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant users. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). A multi-methodological approach was used to explore the design requirements for Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design as compared with Traditional Information Systems design. The findings suggest that Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems are part of a large organisational Digital ecosystem, and hence a design and implementation framework for these systems needs to reflect this. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for the Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design process.
-
PACIS - Design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems: Digital Native and Digital Immigrant Perspectives
2013Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, David Sundaram, Michael D MyersAbstract:Abstract Digital natives are those who have grown up in a Digital world where the use of information and communications technologies is pervasive and ubiquitous. Digital Immigrants are those who learnt to use computers at some stage during their adult life. This paper discusses the design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital natives and Digital Immigrants. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems (oUIS) refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). Based on interviews with Digital natives and Digital Immigrants in one of the leading software companies in the world, our findings suggest that Digital natives and Immigrants have different perspectives and priorities when it comes to the design of oUIS. This paper discusses these differences and the implications for the design of oUIS. Keywords: Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems, Ubiquitous Information Systems, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
-
design of organisational ubiquitous information systems Digital native and Digital Immigrant perspectives
Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 2013Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, David Sundaram, Michael D MyersAbstract:Abstract Digital natives are those who have grown up in a Digital world where the use of information and communications technologies is pervasive and ubiquitous. Digital Immigrants are those who learnt to use computers at some stage during their adult life. This paper discusses the design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital natives and Digital Immigrants. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems (oUIS) refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). Based on interviews with Digital natives and Digital Immigrants in one of the leading software companies in the world, our findings suggest that Digital natives and Immigrants have different perspectives and priorities when it comes to the design of oUIS. This paper discusses these differences and the implications for the design of oUIS. Keywords: Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems, Ubiquitous Information Systems, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
Michael D Myers - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
PACIS - Design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems: A Framework for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant Users
2014Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, Michael D Myers, David SundaramAbstract:This paper focuses on the design and implementation of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant users. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). A multi-methodological approach was used to explore the design requirements for Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design as compared with Traditional Information Systems design. The findings suggest that Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems are part of a large organisational Digital ecosystem, and hence a design and implementation framework for these systems needs to reflect this. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for the Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design process.
-
design of organisational ubiquitous information systems a framework for Digital native and Digital Immigrant users
Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 2014Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, Michael D Myers, David SundaramAbstract:This paper focuses on the design and implementation of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant users. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). A multi-methodological approach was used to explore the design requirements for Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design as compared with Traditional Information Systems design. The findings suggest that Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems are part of a large organisational Digital ecosystem, and hence a design and implementation framework for these systems needs to reflect this. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for the Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design process.
-
PACIS - Design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems: Digital Native and Digital Immigrant Perspectives
2013Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, David Sundaram, Michael D MyersAbstract:Abstract Digital natives are those who have grown up in a Digital world where the use of information and communications technologies is pervasive and ubiquitous. Digital Immigrants are those who learnt to use computers at some stage during their adult life. This paper discusses the design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital natives and Digital Immigrants. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems (oUIS) refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). Based on interviews with Digital natives and Digital Immigrants in one of the leading software companies in the world, our findings suggest that Digital natives and Immigrants have different perspectives and priorities when it comes to the design of oUIS. This paper discusses these differences and the implications for the design of oUIS. Keywords: Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems, Ubiquitous Information Systems, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
-
design of organisational ubiquitous information systems Digital native and Digital Immigrant perspectives
Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 2013Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, David Sundaram, Michael D MyersAbstract:Abstract Digital natives are those who have grown up in a Digital world where the use of information and communications technologies is pervasive and ubiquitous. Digital Immigrants are those who learnt to use computers at some stage during their adult life. This paper discusses the design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital natives and Digital Immigrants. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems (oUIS) refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). Based on interviews with Digital natives and Digital Immigrants in one of the leading software companies in the world, our findings suggest that Digital natives and Immigrants have different perspectives and priorities when it comes to the design of oUIS. This paper discusses these differences and the implications for the design of oUIS. Keywords: Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems, Ubiquitous Information Systems, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
Khushbu Tilvawala - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
PACIS - Design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems: A Framework for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant Users
2014Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, Michael D Myers, David SundaramAbstract:This paper focuses on the design and implementation of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant users. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). A multi-methodological approach was used to explore the design requirements for Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design as compared with Traditional Information Systems design. The findings suggest that Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems are part of a large organisational Digital ecosystem, and hence a design and implementation framework for these systems needs to reflect this. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for the Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design process.
-
design of organisational ubiquitous information systems a framework for Digital native and Digital Immigrant users
Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 2014Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, Michael D Myers, David SundaramAbstract:This paper focuses on the design and implementation of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant users. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). A multi-methodological approach was used to explore the design requirements for Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design as compared with Traditional Information Systems design. The findings suggest that Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems are part of a large organisational Digital ecosystem, and hence a design and implementation framework for these systems needs to reflect this. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for the Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems design process.
-
PACIS - Design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems: Digital Native and Digital Immigrant Perspectives
2013Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, David Sundaram, Michael D MyersAbstract:Abstract Digital natives are those who have grown up in a Digital world where the use of information and communications technologies is pervasive and ubiquitous. Digital Immigrants are those who learnt to use computers at some stage during their adult life. This paper discusses the design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital natives and Digital Immigrants. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems (oUIS) refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). Based on interviews with Digital natives and Digital Immigrants in one of the leading software companies in the world, our findings suggest that Digital natives and Immigrants have different perspectives and priorities when it comes to the design of oUIS. This paper discusses these differences and the implications for the design of oUIS. Keywords: Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems, Ubiquitous Information Systems, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
-
design of organisational ubiquitous information systems Digital native and Digital Immigrant perspectives
Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 2013Co-Authors: Khushbu Tilvawala, David Sundaram, Michael D MyersAbstract:Abstract Digital natives are those who have grown up in a Digital world where the use of information and communications technologies is pervasive and ubiquitous. Digital Immigrants are those who learnt to use computers at some stage during their adult life. This paper discusses the design of Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems for Digital natives and Digital Immigrants. Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems (oUIS) refer to information systems available through many devices such as smart phones that are used by employees of an organisation anytime and anywhere to achieve specific work related goal(s). Based on interviews with Digital natives and Digital Immigrants in one of the leading software companies in the world, our findings suggest that Digital natives and Immigrants have different perspectives and priorities when it comes to the design of oUIS. This paper discusses these differences and the implications for the design of oUIS. Keywords: Organisational Ubiquitous Information Systems, Ubiquitous Information Systems, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
John Palfrey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Youth , Privacy and Reputation Literature Review Youth , Privacy and Reputation Literature Review
Social Science Research, 2010Co-Authors: Alice E. Marwick, Diego Murgia-diaz, John PalfreyAbstract:S worry about children and teenagers online privacy, predominantly due to a perception that youth put themselves at risk for harassment and solicitation by revealing personal information, usually to marketers or on social networking sites (Aidman 2000; Giffen 2008; Read 2006). First, commercial websites and advertising networks are said to manipulate children into providing personal data which is bought, sold, and used for monetary gain (Cai & Gantz 2000; Montgomery & Pasnik 1996; Moscardelli & Liston-Heyes 2004; Youn 2009). Second, recent privacy worries are centered around secrecy, access, and the risks that public living on sites like Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube poses from educational institutions, future employers, pedophiles, and child pornographers (Palfrey et al. 2008; Lenhart & Madden 2007; Youn 2009). These concerns can translate to blaming youth for their carelessness, with the frequently-cited maxim that youth dont care about privacy (Kornblum 2007; Nussbaum 2007; Moscardelli & Liston-Heyes 2004). At the same time that youth are castigated for their openness, children and teenagers are under increasing surveillance at home and school, facilitated by Internet filters, mobile phones, and other monitoring technologies (Berson & Berson, 2006; Hope, 2005).Often, young people are viewed on one side of a generational divide (Herring 2008). Millennials or Digital natives are portrayed as more comfortable with Digital technologies and as having significantly different behaviors than their Digital Immigrant parents (Palfrey & Gasser 2008; Solove 2008; N. Howe & Strauss 2000). There is a risk of this discourse exoticizing the experience of young people from an adult perspective, given the fact that adults perform most of the research on young people, create the technologies that young people use, and produce media commentary on children and teenagers (Herring 2008). Much of the popular medias commentary on young people lumps children and teenagers together using a generational rhetoric that flattens the diverse experiences of young people in different contexts, countries, class positions and traditions.For many of todays young people, peer socialization, flirting, gossiping, relationship-building, and hanging out takes place online (boyd 2008; Ito et al. 2008; Herring 2008). Young people primarily use online technologies to talk with people they already know. Sharing information through social network sites or instant messenger reinforces bonds of trust within peer groups.The idea of two distinct spheres, of the public and the private, is in many ways an outdated concept to todays young people. Much of the studies of privacy online focus on risk, rather than understanding the necessity of private spaces for young people where they can socialize away from the watching eyes of parents or teachers. These seeming contradictions demonstrate how understandings of risk, public space, private information, and the role of the Internet in day-today life differ between children, teenagers, parents, teachers, journalists, and scholars.The scope of this literature review is to map out what is currently understood about the intersections of youth, reputation, and privacy online, focusing on youth attitudes and practices. We summarize both key empirical studies from quantitative and qualitative perspectives and the legal issues involved in regulating privacy and reputation. This project includes studies of children, teenagers, and younger college students. For the purposes of this document, we use teenagers or adolescents to refer to young people ages 13-19; children are considered to be 0-12 years old. However, due to a lack of large-scale empirical research on this topic, and the prevalence of empirical studies on college students, we selectively included studies that discussed age or included age as a variable. Due to language issues, the majority of this literature covers the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Canada.
-
Youth, privacy and reputation (literature review)
Available at SSRN, 2010Co-Authors: Alice E. Marwick, Diego Murgia-diaz, John PalfreyAbstract:S worry about children and teenagers online privacy, predominantly due to a perception that youth put themselves at risk for harassment and solicitation by revealing personal information, usually to marketers or on social networking sites (Aidman 2000; Giffen 2008; Read 2006). First, commercial websites and advertising networks are said to manipulate children into providing personal data which is bought, sold, and used for monetary gain (Cai & Gantz 2000; Montgomery & Pasnik 1996; Moscardelli & Liston-Heyes 2004; Youn 2009). Second, recent privacy worries are centered around secrecy, access, and the risks that public living on sites like Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube poses from educational institutions, future employers, pedophiles, and child pornographers (Palfrey et al. 2008; Lenhart & Madden 2007; Youn 2009). These concerns can translate to blaming youth for their carelessness, with the frequently-cited maxim that youth dont care about privacy (Kornblum 2007; Nussbaum 2007; Moscardelli & Liston-Heyes 2004). At the same time that youth are castigated for their openness, children and teenagers are under increasing surveillance at home and school, facilitated by Internet filters, mobile phones, and other monitoring technologies (Berson & Berson, 2006; Hope, 2005). Often, young people are viewed on one side of a generational divide (Herring 2008). Millennials or Digital natives are portrayed as more comfortable with Digital technologies and as having significantly different behaviors than their Digital Immigrant parents (Palfrey & Gasser 2008; Solove 2008; N. Howe & Strauss 2000). There is a risk of this discourse exoticizing the experience of young people from an adult perspective, given the fact that adults perform most of the research on young people, create the technologies that young people use, and produce media commentary on children and teenagers (Herring 2008). Much of the popular medias commentary on young people lumps children and teenagers together using a generational rhetoric that flattens the diverse experiences of young people in different contexts, countries, class positions and traditions. For many of todays young people, peer socialization, flirting, gossiping, relationship-building, and hanging out takes place online (boyd 2008; Ito et al. 2008; Herring 2008). Young people primarily use online technologies to talk with people they already know. Sharing information through social network sites or instant messenger reinforces bonds of trust within peer groups. The idea of two distinct spheres, of the public and the private, is in many ways an outdated concept to todays young people. Much of the studies of privacy online focus on risk, rather than understanding the necessity of private spaces for young people where they can socialize away from the watching eyes of parents or teachers. These seeming contradictions demonstrate how understandings of risk, public space, private information, and the role of the Internet in day-today life differ between children, teenagers, parents, teachers, journalists, and scholars. The scope of this literature review is to map out what is currently understood about the intersections of youth, reputation, and privacy online, focusing on youth attitudes and practices. We summarize both key empirical studies from quantitative and qualitative perspectives and the legal issues involved in regulating privacy and reputation. This project includes studies of children, teenagers, and younger college students. For the purposes of this document, we use teenagers or adolescents to refer to young people ages 13-19; children are considered to be 0-12 years old. However, due to a lack of large-scale empirical research on this topic, and the prevalence of empirical studies on college students, we selectively included studies that discussed age or included age as a variable. Due to language issues, the majority of this literature covers the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Canada.
Alice E. Marwick - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Youth , Privacy and Reputation Literature Review Youth , Privacy and Reputation Literature Review
Social Science Research, 2010Co-Authors: Alice E. Marwick, Diego Murgia-diaz, John PalfreyAbstract:S worry about children and teenagers online privacy, predominantly due to a perception that youth put themselves at risk for harassment and solicitation by revealing personal information, usually to marketers or on social networking sites (Aidman 2000; Giffen 2008; Read 2006). First, commercial websites and advertising networks are said to manipulate children into providing personal data which is bought, sold, and used for monetary gain (Cai & Gantz 2000; Montgomery & Pasnik 1996; Moscardelli & Liston-Heyes 2004; Youn 2009). Second, recent privacy worries are centered around secrecy, access, and the risks that public living on sites like Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube poses from educational institutions, future employers, pedophiles, and child pornographers (Palfrey et al. 2008; Lenhart & Madden 2007; Youn 2009). These concerns can translate to blaming youth for their carelessness, with the frequently-cited maxim that youth dont care about privacy (Kornblum 2007; Nussbaum 2007; Moscardelli & Liston-Heyes 2004). At the same time that youth are castigated for their openness, children and teenagers are under increasing surveillance at home and school, facilitated by Internet filters, mobile phones, and other monitoring technologies (Berson & Berson, 2006; Hope, 2005).Often, young people are viewed on one side of a generational divide (Herring 2008). Millennials or Digital natives are portrayed as more comfortable with Digital technologies and as having significantly different behaviors than their Digital Immigrant parents (Palfrey & Gasser 2008; Solove 2008; N. Howe & Strauss 2000). There is a risk of this discourse exoticizing the experience of young people from an adult perspective, given the fact that adults perform most of the research on young people, create the technologies that young people use, and produce media commentary on children and teenagers (Herring 2008). Much of the popular medias commentary on young people lumps children and teenagers together using a generational rhetoric that flattens the diverse experiences of young people in different contexts, countries, class positions and traditions.For many of todays young people, peer socialization, flirting, gossiping, relationship-building, and hanging out takes place online (boyd 2008; Ito et al. 2008; Herring 2008). Young people primarily use online technologies to talk with people they already know. Sharing information through social network sites or instant messenger reinforces bonds of trust within peer groups.The idea of two distinct spheres, of the public and the private, is in many ways an outdated concept to todays young people. Much of the studies of privacy online focus on risk, rather than understanding the necessity of private spaces for young people where they can socialize away from the watching eyes of parents or teachers. These seeming contradictions demonstrate how understandings of risk, public space, private information, and the role of the Internet in day-today life differ between children, teenagers, parents, teachers, journalists, and scholars.The scope of this literature review is to map out what is currently understood about the intersections of youth, reputation, and privacy online, focusing on youth attitudes and practices. We summarize both key empirical studies from quantitative and qualitative perspectives and the legal issues involved in regulating privacy and reputation. This project includes studies of children, teenagers, and younger college students. For the purposes of this document, we use teenagers or adolescents to refer to young people ages 13-19; children are considered to be 0-12 years old. However, due to a lack of large-scale empirical research on this topic, and the prevalence of empirical studies on college students, we selectively included studies that discussed age or included age as a variable. Due to language issues, the majority of this literature covers the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Canada.
-
Youth, privacy and reputation (literature review)
Available at SSRN, 2010Co-Authors: Alice E. Marwick, Diego Murgia-diaz, John PalfreyAbstract:S worry about children and teenagers online privacy, predominantly due to a perception that youth put themselves at risk for harassment and solicitation by revealing personal information, usually to marketers or on social networking sites (Aidman 2000; Giffen 2008; Read 2006). First, commercial websites and advertising networks are said to manipulate children into providing personal data which is bought, sold, and used for monetary gain (Cai & Gantz 2000; Montgomery & Pasnik 1996; Moscardelli & Liston-Heyes 2004; Youn 2009). Second, recent privacy worries are centered around secrecy, access, and the risks that public living on sites like Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube poses from educational institutions, future employers, pedophiles, and child pornographers (Palfrey et al. 2008; Lenhart & Madden 2007; Youn 2009). These concerns can translate to blaming youth for their carelessness, with the frequently-cited maxim that youth dont care about privacy (Kornblum 2007; Nussbaum 2007; Moscardelli & Liston-Heyes 2004). At the same time that youth are castigated for their openness, children and teenagers are under increasing surveillance at home and school, facilitated by Internet filters, mobile phones, and other monitoring technologies (Berson & Berson, 2006; Hope, 2005). Often, young people are viewed on one side of a generational divide (Herring 2008). Millennials or Digital natives are portrayed as more comfortable with Digital technologies and as having significantly different behaviors than their Digital Immigrant parents (Palfrey & Gasser 2008; Solove 2008; N. Howe & Strauss 2000). There is a risk of this discourse exoticizing the experience of young people from an adult perspective, given the fact that adults perform most of the research on young people, create the technologies that young people use, and produce media commentary on children and teenagers (Herring 2008). Much of the popular medias commentary on young people lumps children and teenagers together using a generational rhetoric that flattens the diverse experiences of young people in different contexts, countries, class positions and traditions. For many of todays young people, peer socialization, flirting, gossiping, relationship-building, and hanging out takes place online (boyd 2008; Ito et al. 2008; Herring 2008). Young people primarily use online technologies to talk with people they already know. Sharing information through social network sites or instant messenger reinforces bonds of trust within peer groups. The idea of two distinct spheres, of the public and the private, is in many ways an outdated concept to todays young people. Much of the studies of privacy online focus on risk, rather than understanding the necessity of private spaces for young people where they can socialize away from the watching eyes of parents or teachers. These seeming contradictions demonstrate how understandings of risk, public space, private information, and the role of the Internet in day-today life differ between children, teenagers, parents, teachers, journalists, and scholars. The scope of this literature review is to map out what is currently understood about the intersections of youth, reputation, and privacy online, focusing on youth attitudes and practices. We summarize both key empirical studies from quantitative and qualitative perspectives and the legal issues involved in regulating privacy and reputation. This project includes studies of children, teenagers, and younger college students. For the purposes of this document, we use teenagers or adolescents to refer to young people ages 13-19; children are considered to be 0-12 years old. However, due to a lack of large-scale empirical research on this topic, and the prevalence of empirical studies on college students, we selectively included studies that discussed age or included age as a variable. Due to language issues, the majority of this literature covers the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Canada.