The Experts below are selected from a list of 13605 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Tanetha J. Grosland - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Maria Schubert - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Discursive Practice - lean thinking, nurses’ responsibilities and the cost to care
    Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2018
    Co-Authors: Christophe Baret, Clare B. Harvey, Christian M Rochefort, Alannah Meyer, Dietmar Ausserhofer, Ruta Ciutene, Maria Schubert
    Abstract:

    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the literature regarding work intensification that is being experienced by nurses, to examine the effects this is having on their capacity to complete care. The authors contend that nurses’ inability to provide all the care patients require, has negative implications on their professional responsibility. Design/methodology/approach – The authors used institutional ethnography to review the discourse in the literature. This approach supports inquiry through the review of text in order to uncover activities that remain institutionally accepted but unquestioned and hidden. Findings – What the authors found was that the quality and risk management forms an important part of lean thinking, with the organisational culture influencing outcomes; however, the professional cost to nurses has not been fully explored. Research limitations/implications – The text uncovered inconsistency between what organisations accepted as successful cost savings, and what nurses were experiencing in their attempts to achieve the care in the face of reduced time and human resources. Nurses’ attempts at completing care were done at the risk of their own professional accountability. Practical implications – Nurses are working in lean and stressful environments and are struggling to complete care within reduced resource allocations. This leads to care rationing, which negatively impacts on nurses’ professional Practice, and quality of care provision.

  • Discursive Practice lean thinking nurses responsibilities and the cost to care
    Journal of Health Organisation and Management, 2018
    Co-Authors: Clare B. Harvey, Christophe Baret, Christian M Rochefort, Alannah Meyer, Dietmar Ausserhofer, Ruta Ciutene, Maria Schubert
    Abstract:

    The purpose of this paper is to explore the literature regarding work intensification that is being experienced by nurses, to examine the effects this is having on their capacity to complete care. The authors contend that nurses’ inability to provide all the care patients require, has negative implications on their professional responsibility.,The authors used institutional ethnography to review the discourse in the literature. This approach supports inquiry through the review of text in order to uncover activities that remain institutionally accepted but unquestioned and hidden.,What the authors found was that the quality and risk management forms an important part of lean thinking, with the organisational culture influencing outcomes; however, the professional cost to nurses has not been fully explored.,The text uncovered inconsistency between what organisations accepted as successful cost savings, and what nurses were experiencing in their attempts to achieve the care in the face of reduced time and human resources. Nurses’ attempts at completing care were done at the risk of their own professional accountability.,Nurses are working in lean and stressful environments and are struggling to complete care within reduced resource allocations. This leads to care rationing, which negatively impacts on nurses’ professional Practice, and quality of care provision.,This approach is a departure from the standard qualitative review because the focus is on the textual relationships between what is being advocated by organisations directing cost reduction and what is actioned by the nurses working at the coalface. The discordant standpoints between these two juxtapositions are identified.

Paul Benjamin Lowry - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the process of information systems theorizing as a Discursive Practice
    Journal of Information Technology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Nik Rushdi Hassan, Lars Mathiassen, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Although there has been a growing understanding of theory in the information systems field in recent years, the process of theorizing is rarely addressed with contributions originating from other d...

  • The Process of Information Systems Theorizing as a Discursive Practice
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019
    Co-Authors: Nik Rushdi Hassan, Lars Mathiassen, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Although there has been a growing understanding of theory in the Information Systems (IS) field in recent years, the process of theorizing is rarely addressed with contributions originating from other disciplines and little effort to coherently synthesize them. Moreover, the field’s view of theorizing has traditionally focused on the context of justification with an emphasis on collection and analysis of data in response to a research question with theory often added as an afterthought. To fill this void, we foreground the context of discovery that emphasizes the creative and often serendipitous articulation of theory by emphasizing this important stage of theorizing as a reflective and highly iterative Practice. Specifically, we suggest that IS researchers engage in foundational theorizing Practices to form the discourse, problematize the phenomenon of interest and leverage paradigms, and deploy generative theorizing Practices through analogies, metaphors, myths, and models to develop the IS discourse. To illustrate the detailed workings of these Discursive Practices, we draw on key examples from IS theorizing.

Sharon I. Radd - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Clare B. Harvey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Discursive Practice - lean thinking, nurses’ responsibilities and the cost to care
    Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2018
    Co-Authors: Christophe Baret, Clare B. Harvey, Christian M Rochefort, Alannah Meyer, Dietmar Ausserhofer, Ruta Ciutene, Maria Schubert
    Abstract:

    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the literature regarding work intensification that is being experienced by nurses, to examine the effects this is having on their capacity to complete care. The authors contend that nurses’ inability to provide all the care patients require, has negative implications on their professional responsibility. Design/methodology/approach – The authors used institutional ethnography to review the discourse in the literature. This approach supports inquiry through the review of text in order to uncover activities that remain institutionally accepted but unquestioned and hidden. Findings – What the authors found was that the quality and risk management forms an important part of lean thinking, with the organisational culture influencing outcomes; however, the professional cost to nurses has not been fully explored. Research limitations/implications – The text uncovered inconsistency between what organisations accepted as successful cost savings, and what nurses were experiencing in their attempts to achieve the care in the face of reduced time and human resources. Nurses’ attempts at completing care were done at the risk of their own professional accountability. Practical implications – Nurses are working in lean and stressful environments and are struggling to complete care within reduced resource allocations. This leads to care rationing, which negatively impacts on nurses’ professional Practice, and quality of care provision.

  • Discursive Practice lean thinking nurses responsibilities and the cost to care
    Journal of Health Organisation and Management, 2018
    Co-Authors: Clare B. Harvey, Christophe Baret, Christian M Rochefort, Alannah Meyer, Dietmar Ausserhofer, Ruta Ciutene, Maria Schubert
    Abstract:

    The purpose of this paper is to explore the literature regarding work intensification that is being experienced by nurses, to examine the effects this is having on their capacity to complete care. The authors contend that nurses’ inability to provide all the care patients require, has negative implications on their professional responsibility.,The authors used institutional ethnography to review the discourse in the literature. This approach supports inquiry through the review of text in order to uncover activities that remain institutionally accepted but unquestioned and hidden.,What the authors found was that the quality and risk management forms an important part of lean thinking, with the organisational culture influencing outcomes; however, the professional cost to nurses has not been fully explored.,The text uncovered inconsistency between what organisations accepted as successful cost savings, and what nurses were experiencing in their attempts to achieve the care in the face of reduced time and human resources. Nurses’ attempts at completing care were done at the risk of their own professional accountability.,Nurses are working in lean and stressful environments and are struggling to complete care within reduced resource allocations. This leads to care rationing, which negatively impacts on nurses’ professional Practice, and quality of care provision.,This approach is a departure from the standard qualitative review because the focus is on the textual relationships between what is being advocated by organisations directing cost reduction and what is actioned by the nurses working at the coalface. The discordant standpoints between these two juxtapositions are identified.