The Experts below are selected from a list of 333 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Andy Adamson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Requirements for NFSv4 Multi-Domain Namespace Deployment
2016Co-Authors: Nicolas Williams, Andy AdamsonAbstract:This document presents requirements for the deployment of the NFSv4 protocols for the construction of an NFSv4 file Namespace in environments with multiple NFSv4 Domains. To participate in an NFSv4 multi-Domain file Namespace, the server must offer a multi-Domain- capable file system and support RPCSEC_GSS for user authentication. In most instances, the server must also support identity-mapping services.
-
multiple nfsv4 Domain Namespace deployment requirements
2016Co-Authors: Andy AdamsonAbstract:This document presents requirements on the deployment of the NFSv4 protocols for the construction of an NFSv4 file name space in environments with multiple NFSv4 Domains. To participate in an NFSv4 multi-Domain file name space, the server must offer a multi-Domain capable file system and support RPCSEC_GSS for user authentication. In most instances, the server must also support identity mapping services.
-
multiple nfsv4 Domain Namespace deployment guidelines
2016Co-Authors: Andy AdamsonAbstract:This document provides guidance on the deployment of the NFSv4 protocols for the construction of an NFSv4 file name space in environments with multiple NFSv4 Domains. To participate in an NFSv4 mulit-Domain file name space, the server must offer a mulit-Domain capable file system and support RPCSEC_GSS for user authentication. In most instances, the server must also support identity mapping services.
Pras Aiko - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Measuring the Adoption of DDoS Protection Services
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2016Co-Authors: Jonker Mattijs, Sperotto Anna, Van Rijswijk, Roland M., Sadre R., Pras AikoAbstract:Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks have steadily gained in popularity over the last decade, their intensity ranging from mere nuisance to severe. The increased number of attacks, combined with the loss of revenue for the targets, has given rise to a market for DDoS Protection Service (DPS) providers, to whom victims can outsource the cleansing of their traffic by using traffic diversion. In this paper, we investigate the adoption of cloud-based DPSs worldwide. We focus on nine leading providers. Our outlook on adoption is made on the basis of active DNS measurements. We introduce a methodology that allows us, for a given Domain name, to determine if traffic diversion to a DPS is in effect. It also allows us to distinguish various methods of traffic diversion and protection. For our analysis we use a long-term, large-scale data set that covers well over 50% of all names in the global Domain Namespace, in daily snapshots, over a period of 1.5 years. Our results show that DPS adoption has grown by 1.24x during our measurement period, a prominent trend compared to the overall expansion of the Namespace. Our study also reveals that adoption is often lead by big players such as large Web hosters, which activate or deactivate DDoS protection for millions of Domain names at once
Aiko Pras - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Internet Measurement Conference - Measuring the Adoption of DDoS Protection Services
Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference - IMC '16, 2016Co-Authors: M. Jonker, Anna Sperotto, Roland Van Rijswijk-deij, Ramin Sadre, Aiko PrasAbstract:Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks have steadily gained in popularity over the last decade, their intensity ranging from mere nuisance to severe. The increased number of attacks, combined with the loss of revenue for the targets, has given rise to a market for DDoS Protection Service (DPS) providers, to whom victims can outsource the cleansing of their traffic by using traffic diversion. In this paper, we investigate the adoption of cloud-based DPSs worldwide. We focus on nine leading providers. Our outlook on adoption is made on the basis of active DNS measurements. We introduce a methodology that allows us, for a given Domain name, to determine if traffic diversion to a DPS is in effect. It also allows us to distinguish various methods of traffic diversion and protection. For our analysis we use a long-term, large-scale data set that covers well over 50\% of all names in the global Domain Namespace, in daily snapshots, over a period of 1.5 years. Our results show that DPS adoption has grown by 1.24x in our measurement period, a prominent trend compared to the overall expansion of the Namespace. Our study also reveals that adoption is often lead by big players such as large Web hosters, which activate or deactivate DDoS protection for millions of Domain names at once.
Jonker Mattijs - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Measuring the Adoption of DDoS Protection Services
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2016Co-Authors: Jonker Mattijs, Sperotto Anna, Van Rijswijk, Roland M., Sadre R., Pras AikoAbstract:Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks have steadily gained in popularity over the last decade, their intensity ranging from mere nuisance to severe. The increased number of attacks, combined with the loss of revenue for the targets, has given rise to a market for DDoS Protection Service (DPS) providers, to whom victims can outsource the cleansing of their traffic by using traffic diversion. In this paper, we investigate the adoption of cloud-based DPSs worldwide. We focus on nine leading providers. Our outlook on adoption is made on the basis of active DNS measurements. We introduce a methodology that allows us, for a given Domain name, to determine if traffic diversion to a DPS is in effect. It also allows us to distinguish various methods of traffic diversion and protection. For our analysis we use a long-term, large-scale data set that covers well over 50% of all names in the global Domain Namespace, in daily snapshots, over a period of 1.5 years. Our results show that DPS adoption has grown by 1.24x during our measurement period, a prominent trend compared to the overall expansion of the Namespace. Our study also reveals that adoption is often lead by big players such as large Web hosters, which activate or deactivate DDoS protection for millions of Domain names at once
M. Jonker - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Internet Measurement Conference - Measuring the Adoption of DDoS Protection Services
Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference - IMC '16, 2016Co-Authors: M. Jonker, Anna Sperotto, Roland Van Rijswijk-deij, Ramin Sadre, Aiko PrasAbstract:Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks have steadily gained in popularity over the last decade, their intensity ranging from mere nuisance to severe. The increased number of attacks, combined with the loss of revenue for the targets, has given rise to a market for DDoS Protection Service (DPS) providers, to whom victims can outsource the cleansing of their traffic by using traffic diversion. In this paper, we investigate the adoption of cloud-based DPSs worldwide. We focus on nine leading providers. Our outlook on adoption is made on the basis of active DNS measurements. We introduce a methodology that allows us, for a given Domain name, to determine if traffic diversion to a DPS is in effect. It also allows us to distinguish various methods of traffic diversion and protection. For our analysis we use a long-term, large-scale data set that covers well over 50\% of all names in the global Domain Namespace, in daily snapshots, over a period of 1.5 years. Our results show that DPS adoption has grown by 1.24x in our measurement period, a prominent trend compared to the overall expansion of the Namespace. Our study also reveals that adoption is often lead by big players such as large Web hosters, which activate or deactivate DDoS protection for millions of Domain names at once.