The Experts below are selected from a list of 267 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Tsuyoshi Hamada - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Double Guidewire Technique Using an Uneven Double Lumen Catheter for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Interventions
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2020Co-Authors: Yousuke Nakai, Hiroki Oyama, Sachiko Kanai, Kensaku Noguchi, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Saito, Tatsuya Sato, Tsuyoshi HamadaAbstract:Background Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of Double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven Double Lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. Results A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. Conclusions DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.
-
Double guidewire technique using an uneven Double Lumen Catheter for endoscopic ultrasound guided interventions
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2020Co-Authors: Yousuke Nakai, Hiroki Oyama, Sachiko Kanai, Kensaku Noguchi, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Saito, Tatsuya Sato, Tsuyoshi HamadaAbstract:Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of Double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven Double Lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.
Yousuke Nakai - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Double Guidewire Technique Using an Uneven Double Lumen Catheter for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Interventions
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2020Co-Authors: Yousuke Nakai, Hiroki Oyama, Sachiko Kanai, Kensaku Noguchi, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Saito, Tatsuya Sato, Tsuyoshi HamadaAbstract:Background Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of Double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven Double Lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. Results A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. Conclusions DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.
-
Double guidewire technique using an uneven Double Lumen Catheter for endoscopic ultrasound guided interventions
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2020Co-Authors: Yousuke Nakai, Hiroki Oyama, Sachiko Kanai, Kensaku Noguchi, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Saito, Tatsuya Sato, Tsuyoshi HamadaAbstract:Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of Double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven Double Lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.
Kangmo Ahn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
veno venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with a Double Lumen Catheter for pediatric pulmonary support
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2010Co-Authors: Min Suk Choi, Jihyuk Yang, Taegook Jun, Young Tak Lee, Kangmo AhnAbstract:The number of cases of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has rapidly increased all over Korea since the introduction of peripheral cannulation Catheters. However, the application of ECMO to children has been limited due to the shortage of pediatric equipment and difficulty in maintaining an ECMO system with peripheral cannulation. For this reason, there have been only few reports of pediatric ECMO in Korea, and most of them pertained to the veno-arterial type ECMO for supporting the cardiac system in postcardiotomy patients. We report here on the successfully performing veno-venous ECMO, with using a Double Lumen percutaneous Catheter, in a child with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Tomotaka Saito - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Double Guidewire Technique Using an Uneven Double Lumen Catheter for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Interventions
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2020Co-Authors: Yousuke Nakai, Hiroki Oyama, Sachiko Kanai, Kensaku Noguchi, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Saito, Tatsuya Sato, Tsuyoshi HamadaAbstract:Background Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of Double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven Double Lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. Results A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. Conclusions DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.
-
Double guidewire technique using an uneven Double Lumen Catheter for endoscopic ultrasound guided interventions
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2020Co-Authors: Yousuke Nakai, Hiroki Oyama, Sachiko Kanai, Kensaku Noguchi, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Saito, Tatsuya Sato, Tsuyoshi HamadaAbstract:Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of Double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven Double Lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.
Hiroki Oyama - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Double Guidewire Technique Using an Uneven Double Lumen Catheter for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Interventions
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2020Co-Authors: Yousuke Nakai, Hiroki Oyama, Sachiko Kanai, Kensaku Noguchi, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Saito, Tatsuya Sato, Tsuyoshi HamadaAbstract:Background Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of Double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven Double Lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. Results A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. Conclusions DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.
-
Double guidewire technique using an uneven Double Lumen Catheter for endoscopic ultrasound guided interventions
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2020Co-Authors: Yousuke Nakai, Hiroki Oyama, Sachiko Kanai, Kensaku Noguchi, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Saito, Tatsuya Sato, Tsuyoshi HamadaAbstract:Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of Double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven Double Lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.