The Experts below are selected from a list of 93 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
V. G. Fainshtein - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Determining the full halo coronal mass ejection characteristics
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 2008Co-Authors: V. G. FainshteinAbstract:AbstractIn this paper we determined the parameters of 45 full halo coronal mass ejections (HCMEs) for various modifications of their cone forms (“ice cream cone models”). We show that the CME determined characteristics depend significantly on the CME chosen form. We show that, regardless of the CME chosen form, the trajectory of practically all the considered HCMEs deviate from the radial direction to the Sun-to-Earth Axis at the initial stage of their movement.
-
Method for determining the parameters of full halo coronal mass ejections
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2006Co-Authors: V. G. FainshteinAbstract:A method for determining the parameters of halo-type coronal mass ejections (full halo CMEs)—direction of motion, angular size, CME velocity along the Sun-Earth Axis, etc.—has been proposed and tested. The method is based on the found empirical dependence between the angular sizes of CMEs located near the sky plane and angular sizes of associated eruptive prominences or post-eruptive arcades as well as on the relationships between the halo CME parameters derived in a simple geometrical CME model. Using this method and the SOHO/LASCO C3 and SOHO/EIT data, the parameters of 33 full halo CMEs have been determined. It is concluded that (1) the trajectories of all considered full halo CMEs deviate with recession of the CME front to R _ F > (2–5) R _0 toward the Sun-Earth Axis; (2) the majority of full halo CMEs recorded by LASCO C3 coronagraphs have relatively large angular sizes, 2α > 60°.
E. O. Flückiger - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A model of the steady state magnetic field in the magnetosheath
Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994Co-Authors: E. Kobel, E. O. FlückigerAbstract:The authors present a potential field model of the average static field in the magnetosheath. The model has five parameters, the standoff distance to the bow shock, the stand off distance to the magnetopause, and the components of the interplanetary magnetic field. The magnetosheath is modeled as a paraboloid of rotation about the sun-Earth Axis. This model provides analytic solutions of use in studying particle dynamics in the magnetosheath.
E. Kobel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A model of the steady state magnetic field in the magnetosheath
Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994Co-Authors: E. Kobel, E. O. FlückigerAbstract:The authors present a potential field model of the average static field in the magnetosheath. The model has five parameters, the standoff distance to the bow shock, the stand off distance to the magnetopause, and the components of the interplanetary magnetic field. The magnetosheath is modeled as a paraboloid of rotation about the sun-Earth Axis. This model provides analytic solutions of use in studying particle dynamics in the magnetosheath.
L. G. Bell - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A 30,000 yr precession-related cycle affecting climate
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2003Co-Authors: L. G. BellAbstract:¶Evidence is presented for a previously unknown climate cycle of 30,000 yr period. The cycle is deemed to be related to the gyroscopic precession, or wobble of the Earth Axis. Since it inhibits glaciation, the 30,000 yr cycle is called the summer cycle while its counterpart, the 22,000 yr “precession” cycle, is the winter cycle. Because of the aspect presented to the Sun, summer is effectively longer than winter. This is used to explain the difference between summer and winter cycle periods and that of the wobble. Some of the problems encountered in interpreting oxygen ratio glaciation data are resolved by knowledge of the existence of the summer cycle and a means is devised for determining the relative volume of glacial ice. An argument is made that essentially eliminates the 100,000 yr-orbit cycle, by itself or in combination with other attitude cycles, as a possible cause of the glacial/interglacial cycles.
Imad A. Al-qasem - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
DOES Earth REBALANCE ITSELF
2017Co-Authors: A. R. Touqan, Imad A. Al-qasemAbstract:Sumatra Earthquake (2004) and Japan Earthquake (2011) shifted Earth’s Axis by (7cm) and (17cm) respectively. [1] Al-Qasem and Touqan suggested different solutions to the problem in their paper titled “ Importance of Returning Earth Axis to Its Original Direction”. Their solution was enlightened from the holy Quran. S urprisingly their first solution proposed to be done at 11/3/2013 occurred naturally without human interference one year later at 1/4/2014 almost exactly at at their suggested location . This raises a question: Does Earth rebalance itself if human is behind doing his role? Almost one fourth to one fifth of the population of the Earth believes that Quran is a universal reference. After the above scientific proof derived from both scientific data and the understanding of the authors, this paper tries to provide an understanding derived from the Quran the answer of the question in head. Dealing with global issues and developing international references is for sure a matter of admiration for scientific area. If the claim of muslins is right, having a universal reference that helps human understandings in less developed countries to be able to forecast universal issues is an image to human possibilities for developed countries of the horizon that can be opened to scientists in various fields.
-
Importance of returning Earth Axis to its original direction
International journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2013Co-Authors: Imad A. Al-qasem, A. R. TouqanAbstract:Sumatra Earthquake (2004) and Japan Earthquake (2011) shifted Earth’s Axis by (7cm) and (17cm) respectively (CNN, 2011) see Figure (1). This shift led to push the northern part of the Earth – the part where most worlds' population lives- to the south. The northern part thus enters to the more vulnerable area in respect to the sun. Some of the measured results expected from such shift are the rise in temperature in northern areas, melting parts of the Arctic, the appearance of heat waves in Europe, increased drought in the Middle East and reducing the rainfall level in the head waters of the Nile. Since most of the Earth's populations are threatened by such changes, trying to return the Earth Axis to its original position should be a matter of concern and one of the important ways to solve such a problem. This paper presents a theory of reason of occurrence of Sumatra and Japan Earthquakes and different methodologies trying to solve such a problem. Adopting any methodology is a matter of concern for many countries in the world and thus needs a global cooperation. Three global plans to solve such a problem will be presented. Thus a need exists for a global law to be enforced on all countries based on the Earth needs.
