The Experts below are selected from a list of 45324 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Alan H. Decherney - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:Objective: To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy, Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy
-
Comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy.
Obstetrics and gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:OBJECTIVE To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy. RESULTS Sixteen of 103 women (15.5%) undergoing laparoscopic salpingostomy were treated for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy, in contrast to one of 54 women (1.8%) who had salpingostomy by laparotomy. The adjusted odds ratio for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for an intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy was 8.4, with 95% confidence interval 1.1-62 (P < .02). Stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that a laparoscopic approach to salpingostomy (P < .05), smaller Ectopic size (P < .01), and fewer days of amenorrhea (P < .05) predicted persistent Ectopic Pregnancy. CONCLUSION Persistent Ectopic Pregnancy is more likely after laparoscopic salpingostomy than after salpingostomy at laparotomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy.
David B. Seifer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:Objective: To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy, Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy
-
Comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy.
Obstetrics and gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:OBJECTIVE To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy. RESULTS Sixteen of 103 women (15.5%) undergoing laparoscopic salpingostomy were treated for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy, in contrast to one of 54 women (1.8%) who had salpingostomy by laparotomy. The adjusted odds ratio for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for an intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy was 8.4, with 95% confidence interval 1.1-62 (P < .02). Stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that a laparoscopic approach to salpingostomy (P < .05), smaller Ectopic size (P < .01), and fewer days of amenorrhea (P < .05) predicted persistent Ectopic Pregnancy. CONCLUSION Persistent Ectopic Pregnancy is more likely after laparoscopic salpingostomy than after salpingostomy at laparotomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy.
Jacqueline N Gutmann - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:Objective: To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy, Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy
-
Comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy.
Obstetrics and gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:OBJECTIVE To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy. RESULTS Sixteen of 103 women (15.5%) undergoing laparoscopic salpingostomy were treated for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy, in contrast to one of 54 women (1.8%) who had salpingostomy by laparotomy. The adjusted odds ratio for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for an intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy was 8.4, with 95% confidence interval 1.1-62 (P < .02). Stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that a laparoscopic approach to salpingostomy (P < .05), smaller Ectopic size (P < .01), and fewer days of amenorrhea (P < .05) predicted persistent Ectopic Pregnancy. CONCLUSION Persistent Ectopic Pregnancy is more likely after laparoscopic salpingostomy than after salpingostomy at laparotomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy.
Celia A Kamps - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:Objective: To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy, Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy
-
Comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy.
Obstetrics and gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:OBJECTIVE To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy. RESULTS Sixteen of 103 women (15.5%) undergoing laparoscopic salpingostomy were treated for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy, in contrast to one of 54 women (1.8%) who had salpingostomy by laparotomy. The adjusted odds ratio for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for an intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy was 8.4, with 95% confidence interval 1.1-62 (P < .02). Stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that a laparoscopic approach to salpingostomy (P < .05), smaller Ectopic size (P < .01), and fewer days of amenorrhea (P < .05) predicted persistent Ectopic Pregnancy. CONCLUSION Persistent Ectopic Pregnancy is more likely after laparoscopic salpingostomy than after salpingostomy at laparotomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy.
William D. Grant - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:Objective: To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy, Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy
-
Comparison of persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy.
Obstetrics and gynecology, 1993Co-Authors: David B. Seifer, Jacqueline N Gutmann, Celia A Kamps, William D. Grant, Alan H. DecherneyAbstract:OBJECTIVE To compare persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for the treatment of intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 157 patients who had undergone salpingostomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy at Yale-New Haven Hospital between September 1, 1986 and August 31, 1991. One hundred three women had laparoscopic salpingostomy and 54 had salpingostomy at laparotomy. RESULTS Sixteen of 103 women (15.5%) undergoing laparoscopic salpingostomy were treated for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy, in contrast to one of 54 women (1.8%) who had salpingostomy by laparotomy. The adjusted odds ratio for persistent Ectopic Pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for an intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy was 8.4, with 95% confidence interval 1.1-62 (P < .02). Stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that a laparoscopic approach to salpingostomy (P < .05), smaller Ectopic size (P < .01), and fewer days of amenorrhea (P < .05) predicted persistent Ectopic Pregnancy. CONCLUSION Persistent Ectopic Pregnancy is more likely after laparoscopic salpingostomy than after salpingostomy at laparotomy for intact ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy.
