The Experts below are selected from a list of 192915 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Jae Yong Shin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive annual bonus contracts
The Accounting Review, 2015Co-Authors: Clara Xiaoling Chen, Ella Mae Matsumura, Jae Yong ShinAbstract:ABSTRACT: This paper empirically examines the interactive Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives' annual bonus contracts. Specifically, we predict a stronger association between Competition intensity in an industry and the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives' annual bonus contracts when the Competition is non-price-based than when the Competition is price-based. Using hand-collected data from Standard & Poor's (S&P) 1500 firms' disclosures of the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts in 2006 and 2010 proxy statements, we find results consistent with our prediction. Our results are robust to alternative measures of Competition type and Competition intensity. We also find similar results when we use the weight on customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts as the dependent variable. Our study extends the literature on the Effect of Competition on the design of managerial ince...
-
the Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive annual bonus contracts
Social Science Research Network, 2014Co-Authors: Clara Xiaoling Chen, Ella Mae Matsumura, Jae Yong ShinAbstract:This paper empirically examines the interactive Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives’ annual bonus contracts. Specifically, we predict a stronger association between Competition intensity in an industry and the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives’ annual bonus contracts when the Competition is non-price-based than when the Competition is price-based. Using hand-collected data from S&P 1500 firms’ disclosures of the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts in 2006 and 2010 proxy statements, we find results consistent with our prediction. Our results are robust to alternative measures of Competition type and Competition intensity. We also find similar results when we use the weight on customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts as the dependent variable. Our study extends the literature on the Effect of Competition on the design of managerial incentives by distinguishing between Competition intensity and Competition type and providing the first large-sample empirical evidence on the joint Effect of these two dimensions of Competition on the incentive use of an important nonfinancial performance measure.
Clara Xiaoling Chen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive annual bonus contracts
The Accounting Review, 2015Co-Authors: Clara Xiaoling Chen, Ella Mae Matsumura, Jae Yong ShinAbstract:ABSTRACT: This paper empirically examines the interactive Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives' annual bonus contracts. Specifically, we predict a stronger association between Competition intensity in an industry and the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives' annual bonus contracts when the Competition is non-price-based than when the Competition is price-based. Using hand-collected data from Standard & Poor's (S&P) 1500 firms' disclosures of the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts in 2006 and 2010 proxy statements, we find results consistent with our prediction. Our results are robust to alternative measures of Competition type and Competition intensity. We also find similar results when we use the weight on customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts as the dependent variable. Our study extends the literature on the Effect of Competition on the design of managerial ince...
-
the Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive annual bonus contracts
Social Science Research Network, 2014Co-Authors: Clara Xiaoling Chen, Ella Mae Matsumura, Jae Yong ShinAbstract:This paper empirically examines the interactive Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives’ annual bonus contracts. Specifically, we predict a stronger association between Competition intensity in an industry and the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives’ annual bonus contracts when the Competition is non-price-based than when the Competition is price-based. Using hand-collected data from S&P 1500 firms’ disclosures of the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts in 2006 and 2010 proxy statements, we find results consistent with our prediction. Our results are robust to alternative measures of Competition type and Competition intensity. We also find similar results when we use the weight on customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts as the dependent variable. Our study extends the literature on the Effect of Competition on the design of managerial incentives by distinguishing between Competition intensity and Competition type and providing the first large-sample empirical evidence on the joint Effect of these two dimensions of Competition on the incentive use of an important nonfinancial performance measure.
Ella Mae Matsumura - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive annual bonus contracts
The Accounting Review, 2015Co-Authors: Clara Xiaoling Chen, Ella Mae Matsumura, Jae Yong ShinAbstract:ABSTRACT: This paper empirically examines the interactive Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives' annual bonus contracts. Specifically, we predict a stronger association between Competition intensity in an industry and the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives' annual bonus contracts when the Competition is non-price-based than when the Competition is price-based. Using hand-collected data from Standard & Poor's (S&P) 1500 firms' disclosures of the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts in 2006 and 2010 proxy statements, we find results consistent with our prediction. Our results are robust to alternative measures of Competition type and Competition intensity. We also find similar results when we use the weight on customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts as the dependent variable. Our study extends the literature on the Effect of Competition on the design of managerial ince...
-
the Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive annual bonus contracts
Social Science Research Network, 2014Co-Authors: Clara Xiaoling Chen, Ella Mae Matsumura, Jae Yong ShinAbstract:This paper empirically examines the interactive Effect of Competition intensity and Competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives’ annual bonus contracts. Specifically, we predict a stronger association between Competition intensity in an industry and the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives’ annual bonus contracts when the Competition is non-price-based than when the Competition is price-based. Using hand-collected data from S&P 1500 firms’ disclosures of the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts in 2006 and 2010 proxy statements, we find results consistent with our prediction. Our results are robust to alternative measures of Competition type and Competition intensity. We also find similar results when we use the weight on customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts as the dependent variable. Our study extends the literature on the Effect of Competition on the design of managerial incentives by distinguishing between Competition intensity and Competition type and providing the first large-sample empirical evidence on the joint Effect of these two dimensions of Competition on the incentive use of an important nonfinancial performance measure.
Konstantinos Serfes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
is the Effect of Competition on price dispersion nonmonotonic evidence from the u s airline industry
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2014Co-Authors: Mian Dai, Qihong Liu, Konstantinos SerfesAbstract:We investigate the Effect of Competition on price dispersion in the airline industry. Using panel data from 1993 to 2008, we find a nonmonotonic Effect of Competition on price dispersion. An increase in Competition is associated with greater price dispersion in concentrated markets but with less price dispersion in competitive markets—an inverse-U relationship. Our empirical findings are consistent with an oligopolistic second-degree price discrimination model and encompass contradictory findings in the literature.
-
is the Effect of Competition on price dispersion non monotonic evidence from the u s airline industry
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2014Co-Authors: Mian Dai, Qihong Liu, Konstantinos SerfesAbstract:We investigate the Effect of Competition on price dispersion in the airline industry. Using panel data from 1993 to 2008, we find a nonmonotonic Effect of Competition on price dispersion. An increase in Competition is associated with greater price dispersion in concentrated markets but with less price dispersion in competitive markets—an inverse-U relationship. Our empirical findings are consistent with an oligopolistic second-degree price discrimination model and encompass contradictory findings in the literature. © 2014 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
D Swoboda - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
theoretical models of planetary system formation mass vs semi major axis
Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2013Co-Authors: Yann Alibert, F Carron, Andrea Fortier, Samuel Moses Pfyffer, W Benz, Christoph Mordasini, D SwobodaAbstract:Context. Planet formation models have been developed during the past years to try to reproduce what has been observed of both the solar system and the extrasolar planets. Some of these models have partially succeeded, but they focus on massive planets and, for the sake of simplicity, exclude planets belonging to planetary systems. However, more and more planets are now found in planetary systems. This tendency, which is a result of radial velocity, transit, and direct imaging surveys, seems to be even more pronounced for low-mass planets. These new observations require improving planet formation models, including new physics, and considering the formation of systems. Aims: In a recent series of papers, we have presented some improvements in the physics of our models, focussing in particular on the internal structure of forming planets, and on the computation of the excitation state of planetesimals and their resulting accretion rate. In this paper, we focus on the concurrent Effect of the formation of more than one planet in the same protoplanetary disc and show the Effect, in terms of architecture and composition of this multiplicity. Methods: We used an N-body calculation including collision detection to compute the orbital evolution of a planetary system. Moreover, we describe the Effect of Competition for accretion of gas and solids, as well as the Effect of gravitational interactions between planets. Results: We show that the masses and semi-major axes of planets are modified by both the Effect of Competition and gravitational interactions. We also present the Effect of the assumed number of forming planets in the same system (a free parameter of the model), as well as the Effect of the inclination and eccentricity damping. We find that the fraction of ejected planets increases from nearly 0 to 8% as we change the number of embryos we seed the system with from 2 to 20 planetary embryos. Moreover, our calculations show that, when considering planets more massive than ~5 M⊕, simulations with 10 or 20 planetary embryos statistically give the same results in terms of mass function and period distribution.
-
theoretical models of planetary system formation mass vs semi major axis
arXiv: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, 2013Co-Authors: Yann Alibert, F Carron, Andrea Fortier, Samuel Moses Pfyffer, W Benz, Christoph Mordasini, D SwobodaAbstract:Planet formation models have been developed during the last years in order to try to reproduce the observations of both the solar system, and the extrasolar planets. Some of these models have partially succeeded, focussing however on massive planets, and for the sake of simplicity excluding planets belonging to planetary systems. However, more and more planets are now found in planetary systems. This tendency, which is a result of both radial velocity, transit and direct imaging surveys, seems to be even more pronounced for low mass planets. These new observations require the improvement of planet formation models, including new physics, and considering the formation of systems. In a recent series of papers, we have presented some improvements in the physics of our models, focussing in particular on the internal structure of forming planets, and on the computation of the excitation state of planetesimals, and their resulting accretion rate. In this paper, we focus on the concurrent Effect of the formation of more than one planet in the same protoplanetary disc, and show the Effect, in terms of global architecture and composition of this multiplicity. We use a N-body calculation including collision detection to compute the orbital evolution of a planetary system. Moreover, we describe the Effect of Competition for accretion of gas and solids, as well as the Effect of gravitational interactions between planets. We show that the masses and semi-major axis of planets are modified by both the Effect of Competition and gravitational interactions. We also present the Effect of the assumed number of forming planets in the same system (a free parameter of the model), as well as the Effect of the inclination and eccentricity damping.