The Experts below are selected from a list of 300 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Daniel A Newman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Equity sensitivity versus Egoism: A reconceptualization and new measure of individual differences in justice perceptions
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2016Co-Authors: Gahyun Jeon, Daniel A NewmanAbstract:Abstract Traditional research on equity sensitivity has defined the construct as a dispositional preference for increased work rewards and/or a preference for reduced work inputs. We note this classic definition is more consistent with the notion of Egoism , and bears little conceptual relationship to equity sensitivity per se. In contrast, we here offer a redefinition of equity sensitivity as a dispositional tendency to perceive stimuli as fair versus unfair. In Study 1, a content validity analysis of the dominant equity sensitivity measure reveals that most items assess input/reward preferences (i.e., Egoism), rather than a dispositional tendency to perceive things fairly. In Study 2, we develop a Neutral Objects Fairness Orientation (NOFO) questionnaire, which exhibits discriminant validity from the classic Egoism-based equity sensitivity measure. Study 3 further validates the NOFO by demonstrating 3-month retest reliability and incremental validity over the traditional Egoism-based measure in predicting justice perceptions. In addition, we show that the NOFO moderates/magnifies the relationship between frequency of evaluative work events and justice perceptions. Study 4 replicates results from previous studies and shows that equity sensitivity and Egoism both predict employees' perceived behavioral contributions—but only equity sensitivity does so through a mechanism of justice perceptions.
-
equity sensitivity versus Egoism new conceptualizations and implications for justice perceptions
75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management AOM 2015, 2015Co-Authors: Gahyun Jeon, Daniel A NewmanAbstract:Traditional research on equity sensitivity has defined the construct as a preference for increased work rewards and/or a preference for reduced work inputs. We note this classic definition is more consistent with the notion of Egoism, and bears little conceptual relationship to equity sensitivity per se. In contrast, we here offer a redefinition of equity sensitivity as a dispositional tendency to perceive stimuli as fair versus unfair. In Study 1, a content validity analysis of the dominant equity sensitivity measure reveals that most items assess input/reward preferences (i.e., Egoism), rather than a dispositional tendency to perceive things fairly. In Study 2, we develop a Neutral Objects Fairness Orientation (NOFO), which exhibits discriminant validity from the classic Egoism-based equity sensitivity measure. Study 3 further validates the NOFO by demonstrating 3-month retest reliability and incremental validity over the traditional Egoism-based measure in predicting justice perceptions, both cross-sec...
Gahyun Jeon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Equity sensitivity versus Egoism: A reconceptualization and new measure of individual differences in justice perceptions
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2016Co-Authors: Gahyun Jeon, Daniel A NewmanAbstract:Abstract Traditional research on equity sensitivity has defined the construct as a dispositional preference for increased work rewards and/or a preference for reduced work inputs. We note this classic definition is more consistent with the notion of Egoism , and bears little conceptual relationship to equity sensitivity per se. In contrast, we here offer a redefinition of equity sensitivity as a dispositional tendency to perceive stimuli as fair versus unfair. In Study 1, a content validity analysis of the dominant equity sensitivity measure reveals that most items assess input/reward preferences (i.e., Egoism), rather than a dispositional tendency to perceive things fairly. In Study 2, we develop a Neutral Objects Fairness Orientation (NOFO) questionnaire, which exhibits discriminant validity from the classic Egoism-based equity sensitivity measure. Study 3 further validates the NOFO by demonstrating 3-month retest reliability and incremental validity over the traditional Egoism-based measure in predicting justice perceptions. In addition, we show that the NOFO moderates/magnifies the relationship between frequency of evaluative work events and justice perceptions. Study 4 replicates results from previous studies and shows that equity sensitivity and Egoism both predict employees' perceived behavioral contributions—but only equity sensitivity does so through a mechanism of justice perceptions.
-
equity sensitivity versus Egoism new conceptualizations and implications for justice perceptions
75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management AOM 2015, 2015Co-Authors: Gahyun Jeon, Daniel A NewmanAbstract:Traditional research on equity sensitivity has defined the construct as a preference for increased work rewards and/or a preference for reduced work inputs. We note this classic definition is more consistent with the notion of Egoism, and bears little conceptual relationship to equity sensitivity per se. In contrast, we here offer a redefinition of equity sensitivity as a dispositional tendency to perceive stimuli as fair versus unfair. In Study 1, a content validity analysis of the dominant equity sensitivity measure reveals that most items assess input/reward preferences (i.e., Egoism), rather than a dispositional tendency to perceive things fairly. In Study 2, we develop a Neutral Objects Fairness Orientation (NOFO), which exhibits discriminant validity from the classic Egoism-based equity sensitivity measure. Study 3 further validates the NOFO by demonstrating 3-month retest reliability and incremental validity over the traditional Egoism-based measure in predicting justice perceptions, both cross-sec...
Max H. Bazerman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
When perspective taking increases taking: reactive Egoism in social interaction.
Journal of personality and social psychology, 2006Co-Authors: Nicholas Epley, Eugene M. Caruso, Max H. BazermanAbstract:Group members often reason egocentrically, believing that they deserve more than their fair share of group resources. Leading people to consider other members’ thoughts and perspectives can reduce these egocentric (self-centered) judgments such that people claim that it is fair for them to take less; however, the consideration of others’ thoughts and perspectives actually increases egoistic (selfish) behavior such that people actually take more of available resources. A series of experiments demonstrates this pattern in competitive contexts in which considering others’ perspectives activates egoistic theories of their likely behavior, leading people to counter by behaving more egoistically themselves. This reactive Egoism is attenuated in cooperative contexts. Discussion focuses on the implications of reactive Egoism in social interaction and on strategies for alleviating its potentially deleterious effects.
-
When Perspective Taking Increases Taking: Reactive Egoism in Social Interaction
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2005Co-Authors: Nicholas Epley, Eugene M. Caruso, Max H. BazermanAbstract:Group members often reason egocentrically, believing that they deserve more than their fair share of group resources. Leading people to consider others members' perspectives can reduce these egocentric (self-centered) judgments, such that people claim that it is fair for them to take less, but it actually increases egoistic (selfish) behavior, such that people actually take more of available resources. Four experiments demonstrate this pattern in competitive contexts where considering others' perspectives activates egoistic theories of their likely behavior, leading people to counter by behaving more egoistically themselves. This reactive Egoism is attenuated in cooperative contexts. Discussion focuses on the implications of reactive Egoism in social interaction, and on strategies for alleviating its potentially deleterious effects.
Nicholas Epley - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
When perspective taking increases taking: reactive Egoism in social interaction.
Journal of personality and social psychology, 2006Co-Authors: Nicholas Epley, Eugene M. Caruso, Max H. BazermanAbstract:Group members often reason egocentrically, believing that they deserve more than their fair share of group resources. Leading people to consider other members’ thoughts and perspectives can reduce these egocentric (self-centered) judgments such that people claim that it is fair for them to take less; however, the consideration of others’ thoughts and perspectives actually increases egoistic (selfish) behavior such that people actually take more of available resources. A series of experiments demonstrates this pattern in competitive contexts in which considering others’ perspectives activates egoistic theories of their likely behavior, leading people to counter by behaving more egoistically themselves. This reactive Egoism is attenuated in cooperative contexts. Discussion focuses on the implications of reactive Egoism in social interaction and on strategies for alleviating its potentially deleterious effects.
-
When Perspective Taking Increases Taking: Reactive Egoism in Social Interaction
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2005Co-Authors: Nicholas Epley, Eugene M. Caruso, Max H. BazermanAbstract:Group members often reason egocentrically, believing that they deserve more than their fair share of group resources. Leading people to consider others members' perspectives can reduce these egocentric (self-centered) judgments, such that people claim that it is fair for them to take less, but it actually increases egoistic (selfish) behavior, such that people actually take more of available resources. Four experiments demonstrate this pattern in competitive contexts where considering others' perspectives activates egoistic theories of their likely behavior, leading people to counter by behaving more egoistically themselves. This reactive Egoism is attenuated in cooperative contexts. Discussion focuses on the implications of reactive Egoism in social interaction, and on strategies for alleviating its potentially deleterious effects.
Robert B Cialdini - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
altruism or Egoism that is still the question
Psychological Inquiry, 1991Co-Authors: Robert B CialdiniAbstract:(1991). Altruism or Egoism? That Is (Still) the Question. Psychological Inquiry: Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 124-126.
