The Experts below are selected from a list of 297 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Takahiko Kobayashi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • trans tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P < 0.0001), shorter postoperative catheterization time (2.8 ± 3.8 vs 5.4 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6.5 ± 3.6 vs 8.8 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.0001) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. CONCLUSIONS Trans-tract Electrocoagulation in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery is a safe and efficient procedure that decreases the need for nephrostomy tube placement after surgery.

  • Trans-tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery.
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P 

Masashi Takeda - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • trans tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P < 0.0001), shorter postoperative catheterization time (2.8 ± 3.8 vs 5.4 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6.5 ± 3.6 vs 8.8 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.0001) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. CONCLUSIONS Trans-tract Electrocoagulation in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery is a safe and efficient procedure that decreases the need for nephrostomy tube placement after surgery.

  • Trans-tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery.
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P 

Shunsuke Sato - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • trans tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P < 0.0001), shorter postoperative catheterization time (2.8 ± 3.8 vs 5.4 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6.5 ± 3.6 vs 8.8 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.0001) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. CONCLUSIONS Trans-tract Electrocoagulation in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery is a safe and efficient procedure that decreases the need for nephrostomy tube placement after surgery.

  • Trans-tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery.
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P 

Takahiro Shitamura - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • trans tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P < 0.0001), shorter postoperative catheterization time (2.8 ± 3.8 vs 5.4 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6.5 ± 3.6 vs 8.8 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.0001) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. CONCLUSIONS Trans-tract Electrocoagulation in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery is a safe and efficient procedure that decreases the need for nephrostomy tube placement after surgery.

  • Trans-tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery.
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P 

Masahiro Inoue - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • trans tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P < 0.0001), shorter postoperative catheterization time (2.8 ± 3.8 vs 5.4 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6.5 ± 3.6 vs 8.8 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.0001) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. CONCLUSIONS Trans-tract Electrocoagulation in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery is a safe and efficient procedure that decreases the need for nephrostomy tube placement after surgery.

  • Trans-tract Electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery.
    International Journal of Urology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Masashi Takeda, Hideyasu Iwamoto, Nao Miyake, Kaoru Ito, Masahiro Inoue, Shunsuke Sato, Takahiro Shitamura, Toshio Kamimura, Naoki Terada, Takahiko Kobayashi
    Abstract:

    AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract Electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract Electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract Electrocoagulation. RESULTS Between the trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract Electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract Electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P